Cargando…

The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces

In studies of social inference and human mate preference, a wide but inconsistent array of tools for computing facial masculinity has been devised. Several of these approaches implicitly assumed that the individual expression of sexually dimorphic shape features, which we refer to as maleness, resem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitteroecker, Philipp, Windhager, Sonja, Müller, Gerd B., Schaefer, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118374
_version_ 1782356719411658752
author Mitteroecker, Philipp
Windhager, Sonja
Müller, Gerd B.
Schaefer, Katrin
author_facet Mitteroecker, Philipp
Windhager, Sonja
Müller, Gerd B.
Schaefer, Katrin
author_sort Mitteroecker, Philipp
collection PubMed
description In studies of social inference and human mate preference, a wide but inconsistent array of tools for computing facial masculinity has been devised. Several of these approaches implicitly assumed that the individual expression of sexually dimorphic shape features, which we refer to as maleness, resembles facial shape features perceived as masculine. We outline a morphometric strategy for estimating separately the face shape patterns that underlie perceived masculinity and maleness, and for computing individual scores for these shape patterns. We further show how faces with different degrees of masculinity or maleness can be constructed in a geometric morphometric framework. In an application of these methods to a set of human facial photographs, we found that shape features typically perceived as masculine are wide faces with a wide inter-orbital distance, a wide nose, thin lips, and a large and massive lower face. The individual expressions of this combination of shape features—the masculinity shape scores—were the best predictor of rated masculinity among the compared methods (r = 0.5). The shape features perceived as masculine only partly resembled the average face shape difference between males and females (sexual dimorphism). Discriminant functions and Procrustes distances to the female mean shape were poor predictors of perceived masculinity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4324773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43247732015-02-18 The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces Mitteroecker, Philipp Windhager, Sonja Müller, Gerd B. Schaefer, Katrin PLoS One Research Article In studies of social inference and human mate preference, a wide but inconsistent array of tools for computing facial masculinity has been devised. Several of these approaches implicitly assumed that the individual expression of sexually dimorphic shape features, which we refer to as maleness, resembles facial shape features perceived as masculine. We outline a morphometric strategy for estimating separately the face shape patterns that underlie perceived masculinity and maleness, and for computing individual scores for these shape patterns. We further show how faces with different degrees of masculinity or maleness can be constructed in a geometric morphometric framework. In an application of these methods to a set of human facial photographs, we found that shape features typically perceived as masculine are wide faces with a wide inter-orbital distance, a wide nose, thin lips, and a large and massive lower face. The individual expressions of this combination of shape features—the masculinity shape scores—were the best predictor of rated masculinity among the compared methods (r = 0.5). The shape features perceived as masculine only partly resembled the average face shape difference between males and females (sexual dimorphism). Discriminant functions and Procrustes distances to the female mean shape were poor predictors of perceived masculinity. Public Library of Science 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4324773/ /pubmed/25671667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118374 Text en © 2015 Mitteroecker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mitteroecker, Philipp
Windhager, Sonja
Müller, Gerd B.
Schaefer, Katrin
The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces
title The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces
title_full The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces
title_fullStr The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces
title_full_unstemmed The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces
title_short The Morphometrics of “Masculinity” in Human Faces
title_sort morphometrics of “masculinity” in human faces
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118374
work_keys_str_mv AT mitteroeckerphilipp themorphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces
AT windhagersonja themorphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces
AT mullergerdb themorphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces
AT schaeferkatrin themorphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces
AT mitteroeckerphilipp morphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces
AT windhagersonja morphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces
AT mullergerdb morphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces
AT schaeferkatrin morphometricsofmasculinityinhumanfaces