Cargando…

Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children

BACKGROUND: Refugees are reported to experience high rates of dental disease, although there are limited data on refugee children. The aim of this study was to report on oral health in refugee-background children in Australia, and to assess their follow-up at dental services. METHODS: Cross-sectiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quach, Alicia, Laemmle-Ruff, Ingrid L, Polizzi, Tatiana, Paxton, Georgia A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25608733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-10
_version_ 1782356724451115008
author Quach, Alicia
Laemmle-Ruff, Ingrid L
Polizzi, Tatiana
Paxton, Georgia A
author_facet Quach, Alicia
Laemmle-Ruff, Ingrid L
Polizzi, Tatiana
Paxton, Georgia A
author_sort Quach, Alicia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Refugees are reported to experience high rates of dental disease, although there are limited data on refugee children. The aim of this study was to report on oral health in refugee-background children in Australia, and to assess their follow-up at dental services. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of opportunistic oral health screening and subsequent dental service use in refugee-background children attending a refugee health clinic in Victoria, Australia, between November 2006 – November 2010. RESULTS: 350 patients (0 – 18 years, mean age 8 years 7 months) had oral health screening; 241 (68.9%) were born overseas, (176 Africa, 65 other countries) and 109 (31.1%) were born in Australia to African-background families. Parents were concerned about oral health in 65/341 (19.1%) children, with specific concern about caries in only 9/341 (2.6%). On assessment, 155/336 (46.1%) had visible caries and 178/345 (51.6%) had caries experience (dmft/DMFT > 0). Where parents were concerned about caries, they were likely to be present (positive predictive value = 100%), however absence of parent concern about caries was not reassuring (negative predictive value = 56.1%). Compared to Australian-born children of African background; African-born children were more likely to be referred for further dental care (adjusted PR 1.33, 95% CI [1.02 – 1.73]), although there was no statistically significant difference in caries prevalence. African-born children were less likely to have caries compared to other overseas-born children (adjusted PR 0.73, 95% CI [0.58 – 0.93]). Overall 187/344 (54.4%) children were referred for further dental care; 91/124 (73.4%) attended any dental appointment. Attendance rates were 90% with a phone reminder system for appointments, attendance reduced when this system lapsed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health is an important public health issue in refugee-background children, despite low levels of parent concern and very few parent reported caries. Routine direct oral health assessment is important in refugee-background children and co-ordinated health systems may help improve their attendance at dental services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4324800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43248002015-02-12 Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children Quach, Alicia Laemmle-Ruff, Ingrid L Polizzi, Tatiana Paxton, Georgia A BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Refugees are reported to experience high rates of dental disease, although there are limited data on refugee children. The aim of this study was to report on oral health in refugee-background children in Australia, and to assess their follow-up at dental services. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of opportunistic oral health screening and subsequent dental service use in refugee-background children attending a refugee health clinic in Victoria, Australia, between November 2006 – November 2010. RESULTS: 350 patients (0 – 18 years, mean age 8 years 7 months) had oral health screening; 241 (68.9%) were born overseas, (176 Africa, 65 other countries) and 109 (31.1%) were born in Australia to African-background families. Parents were concerned about oral health in 65/341 (19.1%) children, with specific concern about caries in only 9/341 (2.6%). On assessment, 155/336 (46.1%) had visible caries and 178/345 (51.6%) had caries experience (dmft/DMFT > 0). Where parents were concerned about caries, they were likely to be present (positive predictive value = 100%), however absence of parent concern about caries was not reassuring (negative predictive value = 56.1%). Compared to Australian-born children of African background; African-born children were more likely to be referred for further dental care (adjusted PR 1.33, 95% CI [1.02 – 1.73]), although there was no statistically significant difference in caries prevalence. African-born children were less likely to have caries compared to other overseas-born children (adjusted PR 0.73, 95% CI [0.58 – 0.93]). Overall 187/344 (54.4%) children were referred for further dental care; 91/124 (73.4%) attended any dental appointment. Attendance rates were 90% with a phone reminder system for appointments, attendance reduced when this system lapsed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health is an important public health issue in refugee-background children, despite low levels of parent concern and very few parent reported caries. Routine direct oral health assessment is important in refugee-background children and co-ordinated health systems may help improve their attendance at dental services. BioMed Central 2015-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4324800/ /pubmed/25608733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-10 Text en © Quach et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quach, Alicia
Laemmle-Ruff, Ingrid L
Polizzi, Tatiana
Paxton, Georgia A
Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
title Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
title_full Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
title_fullStr Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
title_full_unstemmed Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
title_short Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
title_sort gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25608733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-10
work_keys_str_mv AT quachalicia gapsinsmilesandservicesacrosssectionalstudyofdentalcariesinrefugeebackgroundchildren
AT laemmleruffingridl gapsinsmilesandservicesacrosssectionalstudyofdentalcariesinrefugeebackgroundchildren
AT polizzitatiana gapsinsmilesandservicesacrosssectionalstudyofdentalcariesinrefugeebackgroundchildren
AT paxtongeorgiaa gapsinsmilesandservicesacrosssectionalstudyofdentalcariesinrefugeebackgroundchildren