Cargando…
Monkeys Are More Patient in a Foraging Task than in a Standard Intertemporal Choice Task
Studies of animal impulsivity generally find steep subjective devaluation, or discounting, of delayed rewards – often on the order of a 50% reduction in value in a few seconds. Because such steep discounting is highly disfavored in evolutionary models of time preference, we hypothesize that discount...
Autores principales: | Blanchard, Tommy C., Hayden, Benjamin Y. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117057 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task
por: Carter, Evan C., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks
por: Kane, Gary A, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Sunk costs account for rats’ decisions on an intertemporal foraging task
por: Wikenheiser, Andrew M, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The delay-reward heuristic: What do people expect in intertemporal
choice tasks?
por: Skylark, William J., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Percent framing attenuates the magnitude effect in a preference-matching task of intertemporal choice
por: Anvari, Farid, et al.
Publicado: (2022)