Cargando…
Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatments for precancerous cervical lesions were associated with lower pregnancy rates compared to rates in unexposed women and women who had a diagnostic cervical biopsy or colposcopy. DESIGN: Matched, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northwest...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117525 |
_version_ | 1782356764872671232 |
---|---|
author | Naleway, Allison L. Weinmann, Sheila Krishnarajah, Girishanthy Arondekar, Bhakti Fernandez, Jovelle Swamy, Geeta Myers, Evan |
author_facet | Naleway, Allison L. Weinmann, Sheila Krishnarajah, Girishanthy Arondekar, Bhakti Fernandez, Jovelle Swamy, Geeta Myers, Evan |
author_sort | Naleway, Allison L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatments for precancerous cervical lesions were associated with lower pregnancy rates compared to rates in unexposed women and women who had a diagnostic cervical biopsy or colposcopy. DESIGN: Matched, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), an integrated healthcare delivery system in Oregon and Washington. PATIENTS: Women 14 to 53 years old with KPNW enrollment during the period 1998 through 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pregnancy after exposure or index date. Pregnancy was defined using a validated algorithm and electronic medical records data. RESULTS: We observed 570 pregnancies following cervical treatment in 4,137 women, 1,533 pregnancies following a diagnostic procedure in 13,767 women, and 7,436 pregnancies in a frequency-matched sample of 81,435 women unexposed to treatment or diagnostic procedures. After adjusting for age and contraceptive use, we observed a higher rate of pregnancies in the treatment group compared to unexposed women (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30–1.55), but no difference in pregnancy rates between the treatment and diagnostic procedure groups (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.93–1.13). CONCLUSIONS: No adverse effects of cervical procedures on subsequent rates of pregnancy were observed in this cohort with up to twelve years of follow-up time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4324989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43249892015-02-18 Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort Naleway, Allison L. Weinmann, Sheila Krishnarajah, Girishanthy Arondekar, Bhakti Fernandez, Jovelle Swamy, Geeta Myers, Evan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatments for precancerous cervical lesions were associated with lower pregnancy rates compared to rates in unexposed women and women who had a diagnostic cervical biopsy or colposcopy. DESIGN: Matched, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), an integrated healthcare delivery system in Oregon and Washington. PATIENTS: Women 14 to 53 years old with KPNW enrollment during the period 1998 through 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pregnancy after exposure or index date. Pregnancy was defined using a validated algorithm and electronic medical records data. RESULTS: We observed 570 pregnancies following cervical treatment in 4,137 women, 1,533 pregnancies following a diagnostic procedure in 13,767 women, and 7,436 pregnancies in a frequency-matched sample of 81,435 women unexposed to treatment or diagnostic procedures. After adjusting for age and contraceptive use, we observed a higher rate of pregnancies in the treatment group compared to unexposed women (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30–1.55), but no difference in pregnancy rates between the treatment and diagnostic procedure groups (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.93–1.13). CONCLUSIONS: No adverse effects of cervical procedures on subsequent rates of pregnancy were observed in this cohort with up to twelve years of follow-up time. Public Library of Science 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4324989/ /pubmed/25671561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117525 Text en © 2015 Naleway et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Naleway, Allison L. Weinmann, Sheila Krishnarajah, Girishanthy Arondekar, Bhakti Fernandez, Jovelle Swamy, Geeta Myers, Evan Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort |
title | Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort |
title_full | Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort |
title_short | Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort |
title_sort | pregnancy after treatment for cervical cancer precursor lesions in a retrospective matched cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nalewayallisonl pregnancyaftertreatmentforcervicalcancerprecursorlesionsinaretrospectivematchedcohort AT weinmannsheila pregnancyaftertreatmentforcervicalcancerprecursorlesionsinaretrospectivematchedcohort AT krishnarajahgirishanthy pregnancyaftertreatmentforcervicalcancerprecursorlesionsinaretrospectivematchedcohort AT arondekarbhakti pregnancyaftertreatmentforcervicalcancerprecursorlesionsinaretrospectivematchedcohort AT fernandezjovelle pregnancyaftertreatmentforcervicalcancerprecursorlesionsinaretrospectivematchedcohort AT swamygeeta pregnancyaftertreatmentforcervicalcancerprecursorlesionsinaretrospectivematchedcohort AT myersevan pregnancyaftertreatmentforcervicalcancerprecursorlesionsinaretrospectivematchedcohort |