Cargando…

Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of open or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) after rectum, sigmoid, or colon surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 46-73 years) who underwent RP after previous pelvic surgery were included....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mustafa, Mahmoud, Pettaway, Curtis A., Davis, John W., Pisters, Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685300
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.131
_version_ 1782356772723359744
author Mustafa, Mahmoud
Pettaway, Curtis A.
Davis, John W.
Pisters, Louis
author_facet Mustafa, Mahmoud
Pettaway, Curtis A.
Davis, John W.
Pisters, Louis
author_sort Mustafa, Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of open or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) after rectum, sigmoid, or colon surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 46-73 years) who underwent RP after previous pelvic surgery were included. Twenty-four patients (38%) underwent robotic RP and 40 patients (62%) underwent open RP. Bilateral lymph node dissection and nerve preservation were performed in 50 patients (78%) and 35 patients (55%), respectively. Variables evaluated included demographic characteristics, perioperative complications, and functional and oncological outcomes. The median hospitalization and follow-up periods were 2 days (range, 1-12 days) and 21 months (range, 1-108 months), respectively. RESULTS: No conversions from robotic to open surgery were performed and there were no intraoperative complications. Surgical margins were positive in 13 patients (20%), seminal vesicle involvement was detected in 6 patients (9%), and lymph node involvement was found in 2 patients (3%). Postoperative complications included lymphocele in 1 patient, urethral stricture in 1 patient, and bowel obstruction and persistent bladder leakage in 2 patients. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were continent at 7 months and 80% of patients were able to achieve erection with or without medical aid. CONCLUSIONS: Open or robotic RP can be done safely and effectively in patients who have previously undergone pelvic surgery. Although prior pelvic surgery of the large intestine was associated with increased morbidity, it should not be considered a contraindication for robotic or open RP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4325117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43251172015-02-15 Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region Mustafa, Mahmoud Pettaway, Curtis A. Davis, John W. Pisters, Louis Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of open or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) after rectum, sigmoid, or colon surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 46-73 years) who underwent RP after previous pelvic surgery were included. Twenty-four patients (38%) underwent robotic RP and 40 patients (62%) underwent open RP. Bilateral lymph node dissection and nerve preservation were performed in 50 patients (78%) and 35 patients (55%), respectively. Variables evaluated included demographic characteristics, perioperative complications, and functional and oncological outcomes. The median hospitalization and follow-up periods were 2 days (range, 1-12 days) and 21 months (range, 1-108 months), respectively. RESULTS: No conversions from robotic to open surgery were performed and there were no intraoperative complications. Surgical margins were positive in 13 patients (20%), seminal vesicle involvement was detected in 6 patients (9%), and lymph node involvement was found in 2 patients (3%). Postoperative complications included lymphocele in 1 patient, urethral stricture in 1 patient, and bowel obstruction and persistent bladder leakage in 2 patients. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were continent at 7 months and 80% of patients were able to achieve erection with or without medical aid. CONCLUSIONS: Open or robotic RP can be done safely and effectively in patients who have previously undergone pelvic surgery. Although prior pelvic surgery of the large intestine was associated with increased morbidity, it should not be considered a contraindication for robotic or open RP. The Korean Urological Association 2015-02 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4325117/ /pubmed/25685300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.131 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mustafa, Mahmoud
Pettaway, Curtis A.
Davis, John W.
Pisters, Louis
Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
title Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
title_full Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
title_fullStr Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
title_full_unstemmed Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
title_short Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
title_sort robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685300
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.131
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafamahmoud roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion
AT pettawaycurtisa roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion
AT davisjohnw roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion
AT pisterslouis roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion