Cargando…
Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of open or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) after rectum, sigmoid, or colon surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 46-73 years) who underwent RP after previous pelvic surgery were included....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.131 |
_version_ | 1782356772723359744 |
---|---|
author | Mustafa, Mahmoud Pettaway, Curtis A. Davis, John W. Pisters, Louis |
author_facet | Mustafa, Mahmoud Pettaway, Curtis A. Davis, John W. Pisters, Louis |
author_sort | Mustafa, Mahmoud |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of open or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) after rectum, sigmoid, or colon surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 46-73 years) who underwent RP after previous pelvic surgery were included. Twenty-four patients (38%) underwent robotic RP and 40 patients (62%) underwent open RP. Bilateral lymph node dissection and nerve preservation were performed in 50 patients (78%) and 35 patients (55%), respectively. Variables evaluated included demographic characteristics, perioperative complications, and functional and oncological outcomes. The median hospitalization and follow-up periods were 2 days (range, 1-12 days) and 21 months (range, 1-108 months), respectively. RESULTS: No conversions from robotic to open surgery were performed and there were no intraoperative complications. Surgical margins were positive in 13 patients (20%), seminal vesicle involvement was detected in 6 patients (9%), and lymph node involvement was found in 2 patients (3%). Postoperative complications included lymphocele in 1 patient, urethral stricture in 1 patient, and bowel obstruction and persistent bladder leakage in 2 patients. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were continent at 7 months and 80% of patients were able to achieve erection with or without medical aid. CONCLUSIONS: Open or robotic RP can be done safely and effectively in patients who have previously undergone pelvic surgery. Although prior pelvic surgery of the large intestine was associated with increased morbidity, it should not be considered a contraindication for robotic or open RP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4325117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43251172015-02-15 Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region Mustafa, Mahmoud Pettaway, Curtis A. Davis, John W. Pisters, Louis Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of open or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) after rectum, sigmoid, or colon surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 46-73 years) who underwent RP after previous pelvic surgery were included. Twenty-four patients (38%) underwent robotic RP and 40 patients (62%) underwent open RP. Bilateral lymph node dissection and nerve preservation were performed in 50 patients (78%) and 35 patients (55%), respectively. Variables evaluated included demographic characteristics, perioperative complications, and functional and oncological outcomes. The median hospitalization and follow-up periods were 2 days (range, 1-12 days) and 21 months (range, 1-108 months), respectively. RESULTS: No conversions from robotic to open surgery were performed and there were no intraoperative complications. Surgical margins were positive in 13 patients (20%), seminal vesicle involvement was detected in 6 patients (9%), and lymph node involvement was found in 2 patients (3%). Postoperative complications included lymphocele in 1 patient, urethral stricture in 1 patient, and bowel obstruction and persistent bladder leakage in 2 patients. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were continent at 7 months and 80% of patients were able to achieve erection with or without medical aid. CONCLUSIONS: Open or robotic RP can be done safely and effectively in patients who have previously undergone pelvic surgery. Although prior pelvic surgery of the large intestine was associated with increased morbidity, it should not be considered a contraindication for robotic or open RP. The Korean Urological Association 2015-02 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4325117/ /pubmed/25685300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.131 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mustafa, Mahmoud Pettaway, Curtis A. Davis, John W. Pisters, Louis Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region |
title | Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region |
title_full | Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region |
title_fullStr | Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region |
title_short | Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region |
title_sort | robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25685300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafamahmoud roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion AT pettawaycurtisa roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion AT davisjohnw roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion AT pisterslouis roboticoropenradicalprostatectomyafterpreviousopensurgeryinthepelvicregion |