Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System

BACKGROUND: Early interspinous process fixation constructs utilize rigid fixation plates with immobile spikes which increase the difficulty of device implantation when anatomic variations are encountered. Second generation systems have been designed with polyaxial properties with the goal of accommo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sclafani, Joseph A., Liang, Kevin, Ohnmeiss, Donna D., Gordon, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694912
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/1035
_version_ 1782356809921593344
author Sclafani, Joseph A.
Liang, Kevin
Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
Gordon, Charles
author_facet Sclafani, Joseph A.
Liang, Kevin
Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
Gordon, Charles
author_sort Sclafani, Joseph A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early interspinous process fixation constructs utilize rigid fixation plates with immobile spikes which increase the difficulty of device implantation when anatomic variations are encountered. Second generation systems have been designed with polyaxial properties with the goal of accommodating natural osseous anatomic variations to achieve optimal implant placement and fixation integrity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with this device to supplement the biomechanical data from previous studies. METHODS: A retrospective, non-randomized, single-center chart review at or beyond the one year postoperative time point was conducted to collect preoperative and perioperative data on patients treated with a polyaxial intraspinous fixation system. A postoperative numerical pain rating scale and modified MacNab classification score were obtained from each patient in the cohort via phone survey. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included in the study. Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-7 days). There were no reported perioperative blood transfusions or cases of radiographic fracture/migration of the device at the 6 week post-operative time point. There was a significant improvement in pain index score in the overall patient study group and a satisfactory (excellent or good) MacNab result was obtained in 48% of all patients. Patients with preoperative pain scores greater than 8/10 reported more pain improvement than patients with preoperative pain scores less than 5 (0 points, p = 0.96, n = 8). Patients with a BMI less than 30 had significantly better MacNab outcome classifications than patients with a BMI greater than 30. CONCLUSIONS: The polyaxial interspinous fusion system produces significant clinical improvement when employed to treat patients with stenosis, herniated disc, or low grade spondylolisthesis. This device can be implanted with a low complication rate and short postoperative hospital admission time. Patients with high pre-operative pain score and BMI under 30 can be predictors of better clinical outcome and should be considered prior to implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4325480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43254802015-02-18 Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System Sclafani, Joseph A. Liang, Kevin Ohnmeiss, Donna D. Gordon, Charles Int J Spine Surg Article BACKGROUND: Early interspinous process fixation constructs utilize rigid fixation plates with immobile spikes which increase the difficulty of device implantation when anatomic variations are encountered. Second generation systems have been designed with polyaxial properties with the goal of accommodating natural osseous anatomic variations to achieve optimal implant placement and fixation integrity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with this device to supplement the biomechanical data from previous studies. METHODS: A retrospective, non-randomized, single-center chart review at or beyond the one year postoperative time point was conducted to collect preoperative and perioperative data on patients treated with a polyaxial intraspinous fixation system. A postoperative numerical pain rating scale and modified MacNab classification score were obtained from each patient in the cohort via phone survey. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included in the study. Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-7 days). There were no reported perioperative blood transfusions or cases of radiographic fracture/migration of the device at the 6 week post-operative time point. There was a significant improvement in pain index score in the overall patient study group and a satisfactory (excellent or good) MacNab result was obtained in 48% of all patients. Patients with preoperative pain scores greater than 8/10 reported more pain improvement than patients with preoperative pain scores less than 5 (0 points, p = 0.96, n = 8). Patients with a BMI less than 30 had significantly better MacNab outcome classifications than patients with a BMI greater than 30. CONCLUSIONS: The polyaxial interspinous fusion system produces significant clinical improvement when employed to treat patients with stenosis, herniated disc, or low grade spondylolisthesis. This device can be implanted with a low complication rate and short postoperative hospital admission time. Patients with high pre-operative pain score and BMI under 30 can be predictors of better clinical outcome and should be considered prior to implantation. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4325480/ /pubmed/25694912 http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/1035 Text en Copyright © 2014 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Sclafani, Joseph A.
Liang, Kevin
Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
Gordon, Charles
Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System
title Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System
title_full Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System
title_short Clinical Outcomes of a Polyaxial Interspinous Fusion System
title_sort clinical outcomes of a polyaxial interspinous fusion system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694912
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/1035
work_keys_str_mv AT sclafanijosepha clinicaloutcomesofapolyaxialinterspinousfusionsystem
AT liangkevin clinicaloutcomesofapolyaxialinterspinousfusionsystem
AT ohnmeissdonnad clinicaloutcomesofapolyaxialinterspinousfusionsystem
AT gordoncharles clinicaloutcomesofapolyaxialinterspinousfusionsystem