Cargando…

Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the In- space (Synthes, Umkirch, Germany) and the correlation between radiographic parameters and clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: Between June 2009 and May 2013, 56 patients with LSS underwent In-space by one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn, Chaichankul, Chaiyos, Limthongkul, Worawat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694917
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/1032
_version_ 1782356811099144192
author Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
Chaichankul, Chaiyos
Limthongkul, Worawat
author_facet Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
Chaichankul, Chaiyos
Limthongkul, Worawat
author_sort Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the In- space (Synthes, Umkirch, Germany) and the correlation between radiographic parameters and clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: Between June 2009 and May 2013, 56 patients with LSS underwent In-space by one senior surgeon. All of the patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographic measurements before the procedure and each visit at the postoperative follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative X-ray imaging was performed before the procedure and at follow-up to assess the correlation with the clinical outcome. Radiological measurements and clinical outcomes were recorded to establish a relationship between the radiographic parameters and clinical outcome of this procedure. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The mean VAS score of back pain decreased significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that percutaneous interspinous devices are a good alternative to treat LSS. The device offers significant decrease in back pain, leg pain and ODI score with 2-year lasting relief from symptoms. The increased intervertebral foramenal space explains the improvement of leg pain, but the mechanism of back pain relief remains unclear. A very weak correlation between the radiographic changes and improvement of pain was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4325485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43254852015-02-18 Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn Chaichankul, Chaiyos Limthongkul, Worawat Int J Spine Surg Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the In- space (Synthes, Umkirch, Germany) and the correlation between radiographic parameters and clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS). METHODS: Between June 2009 and May 2013, 56 patients with LSS underwent In-space by one senior surgeon. All of the patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographic measurements before the procedure and each visit at the postoperative follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative X-ray imaging was performed before the procedure and at follow-up to assess the correlation with the clinical outcome. Radiological measurements and clinical outcomes were recorded to establish a relationship between the radiographic parameters and clinical outcome of this procedure. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The mean VAS score of back pain decreased significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that percutaneous interspinous devices are a good alternative to treat LSS. The device offers significant decrease in back pain, leg pain and ODI score with 2-year lasting relief from symptoms. The increased intervertebral foramenal space explains the improvement of leg pain, but the mechanism of back pain relief remains unclear. A very weak correlation between the radiographic changes and improvement of pain was found. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4325485/ /pubmed/25694917 http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/1032 Text en Copyright © 2014 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
Chaichankul, Chaiyos
Limthongkul, Worawat
Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up
title Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up
title_full Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up
title_fullStr Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up
title_short Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up
title_sort percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694917
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/1032
work_keys_str_mv AT yingsakmongkolwicharn percutaneousinterspinousdistractiondeviceforthetreatmentoflumbarspinalcanalstenosisclinicalandradiographicresultsat2yearfollowup
AT chaichankulchaiyos percutaneousinterspinousdistractiondeviceforthetreatmentoflumbarspinalcanalstenosisclinicalandradiographicresultsat2yearfollowup
AT limthongkulworawat percutaneousinterspinousdistractiondeviceforthetreatmentoflumbarspinalcanalstenosisclinicalandradiographicresultsat2yearfollowup