Cargando…

Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study

Cases of ectopic pregnancy (EP) following levonorgestrel emergency contraception (LNG-EC) failure have been reported continuously, but whether there is an association between EP risk and LNG-EC is unclear. We concluded a case-control study to explore this association by recruiting 2,411 EP patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jian, Li, Cheng, Zhao, Wei-Hong, Xi, Xiaowei, Cao, Shu-Jun, Ping, Hua, Qin, Guo-Juan, Cheng, Linan, Huang, He-Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep08487
_version_ 1782356826753335296
author Zhang, Jian
Li, Cheng
Zhao, Wei-Hong
Xi, Xiaowei
Cao, Shu-Jun
Ping, Hua
Qin, Guo-Juan
Cheng, Linan
Huang, He-Feng
author_facet Zhang, Jian
Li, Cheng
Zhao, Wei-Hong
Xi, Xiaowei
Cao, Shu-Jun
Ping, Hua
Qin, Guo-Juan
Cheng, Linan
Huang, He-Feng
author_sort Zhang, Jian
collection PubMed
description Cases of ectopic pregnancy (EP) following levonorgestrel emergency contraception (LNG-EC) failure have been reported continuously, but whether there is an association between EP risk and LNG-EC is unclear. We concluded a case-control study to explore this association by recruiting 2,411 EP patients as case group, and 2,416 women with intrauterine pregnancy and 2,419 non-pregnant women as control groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated and adjusted for potential confounding factors. Previous use of LNG-EC was not correlated with the EP. Compared to women who did not use contraceptives, current use of LNG-EC reduced the risk for intrauterine pregnancy (Adjusted OR [AOR] = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.14–0.27), but did not increase the risk for EP (AOR(2) = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.76–1.42). Furthermore, compared to women who did not have further act of intercourse, women with unprotected further act of intercourse were at a higher risk of EP (AOR(1) = 2.35, 95%CI: 1.17–4.71), and women with repeated use of LNG-EC for further intercourse during the same cycle was also associated with a higher risk for EP (AOR(1) = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.09–8.71; AOR(2) = 2.49, 95%CI: 1.00–6.19). A better understanding of the risk of EP following LNG-EC failure can optimize LNG-EC use and thus reduce the risk of EP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4325579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43255792015-02-20 Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study Zhang, Jian Li, Cheng Zhao, Wei-Hong Xi, Xiaowei Cao, Shu-Jun Ping, Hua Qin, Guo-Juan Cheng, Linan Huang, He-Feng Sci Rep Article Cases of ectopic pregnancy (EP) following levonorgestrel emergency contraception (LNG-EC) failure have been reported continuously, but whether there is an association between EP risk and LNG-EC is unclear. We concluded a case-control study to explore this association by recruiting 2,411 EP patients as case group, and 2,416 women with intrauterine pregnancy and 2,419 non-pregnant women as control groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated and adjusted for potential confounding factors. Previous use of LNG-EC was not correlated with the EP. Compared to women who did not use contraceptives, current use of LNG-EC reduced the risk for intrauterine pregnancy (Adjusted OR [AOR] = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.14–0.27), but did not increase the risk for EP (AOR(2) = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.76–1.42). Furthermore, compared to women who did not have further act of intercourse, women with unprotected further act of intercourse were at a higher risk of EP (AOR(1) = 2.35, 95%CI: 1.17–4.71), and women with repeated use of LNG-EC for further intercourse during the same cycle was also associated with a higher risk for EP (AOR(1) = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.09–8.71; AOR(2) = 2.49, 95%CI: 1.00–6.19). A better understanding of the risk of EP following LNG-EC failure can optimize LNG-EC use and thus reduce the risk of EP. Nature Publishing Group 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4325579/ /pubmed/25674909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep08487 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Jian
Li, Cheng
Zhao, Wei-Hong
Xi, Xiaowei
Cao, Shu-Jun
Ping, Hua
Qin, Guo-Juan
Cheng, Linan
Huang, He-Feng
Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study
title Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study
title_full Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study
title_fullStr Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study
title_short Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study
title_sort association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep08487
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjian associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT licheng associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT zhaoweihong associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT xixiaowei associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT caoshujun associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT pinghua associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT qinguojuan associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT chenglinan associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy
AT huanghefeng associationbetweenlevonorgestrelemergencycontraceptionandtheriskofectopicpregnancyamulticentercasecontrolstudy