Cargando…

Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance

[Image: see text] The Ewald, Particle Mesh Ewald (PME), and Fast Fourier–Poisson (FFP) methods are developed for systems composed of spherical multipole moment expansions. A unified set of equations is derived that takes advantage of a spherical tensor gradient operator formalism in both real space...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giese, Timothy J., Panteva, Maria T., Chen, Haoyuan, York, Darrin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5007983
_version_ 1782356829310812160
author Giese, Timothy J.
Panteva, Maria T.
Chen, Haoyuan
York, Darrin M.
author_facet Giese, Timothy J.
Panteva, Maria T.
Chen, Haoyuan
York, Darrin M.
author_sort Giese, Timothy J.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The Ewald, Particle Mesh Ewald (PME), and Fast Fourier–Poisson (FFP) methods are developed for systems composed of spherical multipole moment expansions. A unified set of equations is derived that takes advantage of a spherical tensor gradient operator formalism in both real space and reciprocal space to allow extension to arbitrary multipole order. The implementation of these methods into a novel linear-scaling modified “divide-and-conquer” (mDC) quantum mechanical force field is discussed. The evaluation times and relative force errors are compared between the three methods, as a function of multipole expansion order. Timings and errors are also compared within the context of the quantum mechanical force field, which encounters primary errors related to the quality of reproducing electrostatic forces for a given density matrix and secondary errors resulting from the propagation of the approximate electrostatics into the self-consistent field procedure, which yields a converged, variational, but nonetheless approximate density matrix. Condensed-phase simulations of an mDC water model are performed with the multipolar PME method and compared to an electrostatic cutoff method, which is shown to artificially increase the density of water and heat of vaporization relative to full electrostatic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4325605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43256052015-12-27 Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance Giese, Timothy J. Panteva, Maria T. Chen, Haoyuan York, Darrin M. J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The Ewald, Particle Mesh Ewald (PME), and Fast Fourier–Poisson (FFP) methods are developed for systems composed of spherical multipole moment expansions. A unified set of equations is derived that takes advantage of a spherical tensor gradient operator formalism in both real space and reciprocal space to allow extension to arbitrary multipole order. The implementation of these methods into a novel linear-scaling modified “divide-and-conquer” (mDC) quantum mechanical force field is discussed. The evaluation times and relative force errors are compared between the three methods, as a function of multipole expansion order. Timings and errors are also compared within the context of the quantum mechanical force field, which encounters primary errors related to the quality of reproducing electrostatic forces for a given density matrix and secondary errors resulting from the propagation of the approximate electrostatics into the self-consistent field procedure, which yields a converged, variational, but nonetheless approximate density matrix. Condensed-phase simulations of an mDC water model are performed with the multipolar PME method and compared to an electrostatic cutoff method, which is shown to artificially increase the density of water and heat of vaporization relative to full electrostatic treatment. American Chemical Society 2014-12-27 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4325605/ /pubmed/25691829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5007983 Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Giese, Timothy J.
Panteva, Maria T.
Chen, Haoyuan
York, Darrin M.
Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance
title Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance
title_full Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance
title_fullStr Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance
title_full_unstemmed Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance
title_short Multipolar Ewald Methods, 1: Theory, Accuracy, and Performance
title_sort multipolar ewald methods, 1: theory, accuracy, and performance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5007983
work_keys_str_mv AT giesetimothyj multipolarewaldmethods1theoryaccuracyandperformance
AT pantevamariat multipolarewaldmethods1theoryaccuracyandperformance
AT chenhaoyuan multipolarewaldmethods1theoryaccuracyandperformance
AT yorkdarrinm multipolarewaldmethods1theoryaccuracyandperformance