Cargando…
Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders
Earlier studies have shown that when individuals recall an emotional memory while simultaneously doing a demanding dual-task [e.g., playing Tetris, mental arithmetic, making eye movements (EM)], this reduces self-reported vividness and emotionality of the memory. These effects have been found up to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00016 |
_version_ | 1782356843067080704 |
---|---|
author | van Schie, Kevin Engelhard, Iris M. van den Hout, Marcel A. |
author_facet | van Schie, Kevin Engelhard, Iris M. van den Hout, Marcel A. |
author_sort | van Schie, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Earlier studies have shown that when individuals recall an emotional memory while simultaneously doing a demanding dual-task [e.g., playing Tetris, mental arithmetic, making eye movements (EM)], this reduces self-reported vividness and emotionality of the memory. These effects have been found up to 1 week later, but have largely been confined to self-report ratings. This study examined whether this dual-tasking intervention reduces memory performance (i.e., accessibility of emotional memories). Undergraduates (N = 60) studied word-image pairs and rated the retrieved image on vividness and emotionality when cued with the word. Then they viewed the cues and recalled the images with or without making EM. Finally, they re-rated the images on vividness and emotionality. Additionally, fragments from images from all conditions were presented and participants identified which fragment was paired earlier with which cue. Findings showed no effect of the dual-task manipulation on self-reported ratings and latency responses. Several possible explanations for the lack of effects are discussed, but the cued recall procedure in our experiment seems to explain the absence of effects best. The study demonstrates boundaries to the effects of the “dual-tasking” procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4325664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43256642015-02-27 Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders van Schie, Kevin Engelhard, Iris M. van den Hout, Marcel A. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Earlier studies have shown that when individuals recall an emotional memory while simultaneously doing a demanding dual-task [e.g., playing Tetris, mental arithmetic, making eye movements (EM)], this reduces self-reported vividness and emotionality of the memory. These effects have been found up to 1 week later, but have largely been confined to self-report ratings. This study examined whether this dual-tasking intervention reduces memory performance (i.e., accessibility of emotional memories). Undergraduates (N = 60) studied word-image pairs and rated the retrieved image on vividness and emotionality when cued with the word. Then they viewed the cues and recalled the images with or without making EM. Finally, they re-rated the images on vividness and emotionality. Additionally, fragments from images from all conditions were presented and participants identified which fragment was paired earlier with which cue. Findings showed no effect of the dual-task manipulation on self-reported ratings and latency responses. Several possible explanations for the lack of effects are discussed, but the cued recall procedure in our experiment seems to explain the absence of effects best. The study demonstrates boundaries to the effects of the “dual-tasking” procedure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4325664/ /pubmed/25729370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00016 Text en Copyright © 2015 van Schie, Engelhard and van den Hout. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry van Schie, Kevin Engelhard, Iris M. van den Hout, Marcel A. Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders |
title | Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders |
title_full | Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders |
title_fullStr | Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders |
title_full_unstemmed | Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders |
title_short | Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders |
title_sort | taxing working memory during retrieval of emotional memories does not reduce memory accessibility when cued with reminders |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanschiekevin taxingworkingmemoryduringretrievalofemotionalmemoriesdoesnotreducememoryaccessibilitywhencuedwithreminders AT engelhardirism taxingworkingmemoryduringretrievalofemotionalmemoriesdoesnotreducememoryaccessibilitywhencuedwithreminders AT vandenhoutmarcela taxingworkingmemoryduringretrievalofemotionalmemoriesdoesnotreducememoryaccessibilitywhencuedwithreminders |