Cargando…

Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) applications, such as innovative electronic forms on smartphones, could potentially improve the performance of health care workers and health systems in developing countries. However, contextual evidence on health workers’ barriers and motivating factors that may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medhanyie, Araya Abrha, Little, Alex, Yebyo, Henock, Spigt, Mark, Tadesse, Kidane, Blanco, Roman, Dinant, Geert-Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25588973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-2
_version_ 1782356872996585472
author Medhanyie, Araya Abrha
Little, Alex
Yebyo, Henock
Spigt, Mark
Tadesse, Kidane
Blanco, Roman
Dinant, Geert-Jan
author_facet Medhanyie, Araya Abrha
Little, Alex
Yebyo, Henock
Spigt, Mark
Tadesse, Kidane
Blanco, Roman
Dinant, Geert-Jan
author_sort Medhanyie, Araya Abrha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) applications, such as innovative electronic forms on smartphones, could potentially improve the performance of health care workers and health systems in developing countries. However, contextual evidence on health workers’ barriers and motivating factors that may influence large-scale implementation of such interfaces for health care delivery is scarce. METHODS: A pretested semistructured questionnaire was used to assess health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences, and motivating factors in using mobile health forms on smartphones in the context of maternal health care in Ethiopia. Twenty-five health extension workers (HEWs) and midwives, working in 13 primary health care facilities in Tigray region, Ethiopia, participated in this study. RESULTS: Over a 6-month period, a total of 2,893 electronic health records of 1,122 women were submitted to a central computer through the Internet. Sixteen (69.6%) workers believed the forms were good reminders on what to do and what questions needed to be asked. Twelve (52.2%) workers said electronic forms were comprehensive and 9 (39.1%) workers saw electronic forms as learning tools. All workers preferred unrestricted use of the smartphones and believed it helped them adapt to the smartphones and electronic forms for work purposes. With regards to language preference, 18 (78.3%) preferred using the local language (Tigrinya) version of the forms to English. Indentified barriers for not using electronic forms consistently include challenges related to electronic forms (for example, problem with username and password setting as reported by 5 (21.7%), smartphones (for example, smartphone froze or locked up as reported by 9 (39.1%) and health system (for example, frequent movement of health workers as reported by 19 (82.6%)). CONCLUSIONS: Both HEWs and midwives found the electronic forms on smartphones useful for their day-to-day maternal health care services delivery. However, sustainable use and implementation of such work tools at scale would be daunting without providing technical support to health workers, securing mobile network airtime and improving key functions of the larger health system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4491-13-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4325949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43259492015-02-13 Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia Medhanyie, Araya Abrha Little, Alex Yebyo, Henock Spigt, Mark Tadesse, Kidane Blanco, Roman Dinant, Geert-Jan Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) applications, such as innovative electronic forms on smartphones, could potentially improve the performance of health care workers and health systems in developing countries. However, contextual evidence on health workers’ barriers and motivating factors that may influence large-scale implementation of such interfaces for health care delivery is scarce. METHODS: A pretested semistructured questionnaire was used to assess health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences, and motivating factors in using mobile health forms on smartphones in the context of maternal health care in Ethiopia. Twenty-five health extension workers (HEWs) and midwives, working in 13 primary health care facilities in Tigray region, Ethiopia, participated in this study. RESULTS: Over a 6-month period, a total of 2,893 electronic health records of 1,122 women were submitted to a central computer through the Internet. Sixteen (69.6%) workers believed the forms were good reminders on what to do and what questions needed to be asked. Twelve (52.2%) workers said electronic forms were comprehensive and 9 (39.1%) workers saw electronic forms as learning tools. All workers preferred unrestricted use of the smartphones and believed it helped them adapt to the smartphones and electronic forms for work purposes. With regards to language preference, 18 (78.3%) preferred using the local language (Tigrinya) version of the forms to English. Indentified barriers for not using electronic forms consistently include challenges related to electronic forms (for example, problem with username and password setting as reported by 5 (21.7%), smartphones (for example, smartphone froze or locked up as reported by 9 (39.1%) and health system (for example, frequent movement of health workers as reported by 19 (82.6%)). CONCLUSIONS: Both HEWs and midwives found the electronic forms on smartphones useful for their day-to-day maternal health care services delivery. However, sustainable use and implementation of such work tools at scale would be daunting without providing technical support to health workers, securing mobile network airtime and improving key functions of the larger health system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4491-13-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4325949/ /pubmed/25588973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-2 Text en © Medhanyie et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Medhanyie, Araya Abrha
Little, Alex
Yebyo, Henock
Spigt, Mark
Tadesse, Kidane
Blanco, Roman
Dinant, Geert-Jan
Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia
title Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia
title_full Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia
title_short Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia
title_sort health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mhealth forms in ethiopia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4325949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25588973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-2
work_keys_str_mv AT medhanyiearayaabrha healthworkersexperiencesbarrierspreferencesandmotivatingfactorsinusingmhealthformsinethiopia
AT littlealex healthworkersexperiencesbarrierspreferencesandmotivatingfactorsinusingmhealthformsinethiopia
AT yebyohenock healthworkersexperiencesbarrierspreferencesandmotivatingfactorsinusingmhealthformsinethiopia
AT spigtmark healthworkersexperiencesbarrierspreferencesandmotivatingfactorsinusingmhealthformsinethiopia
AT tadessekidane healthworkersexperiencesbarrierspreferencesandmotivatingfactorsinusingmhealthformsinethiopia
AT blancoroman healthworkersexperiencesbarrierspreferencesandmotivatingfactorsinusingmhealthformsinethiopia
AT dinantgeertjan healthworkersexperiencesbarrierspreferencesandmotivatingfactorsinusingmhealthformsinethiopia