Cargando…

Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review

Technological advancements have led to the development of numerous wearable robotic devices for the physical assistance and restoration of human locomotion. While many challenges remain with respect to the mechanical design of such devices, it is at least equally challenging and important to develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tucker, Michael R, Olivier, Jeremy, Pagel, Anna, Bleuler, Hannes, Bouri, Mohamed, Lambercy, Olivier, Millán, José del R, Riener, Robert, Vallery, Heike, Gassert, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25557982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-12-1
_version_ 1782356948483571712
author Tucker, Michael R
Olivier, Jeremy
Pagel, Anna
Bleuler, Hannes
Bouri, Mohamed
Lambercy, Olivier
Millán, José del R
Riener, Robert
Vallery, Heike
Gassert, Roger
author_facet Tucker, Michael R
Olivier, Jeremy
Pagel, Anna
Bleuler, Hannes
Bouri, Mohamed
Lambercy, Olivier
Millán, José del R
Riener, Robert
Vallery, Heike
Gassert, Roger
author_sort Tucker, Michael R
collection PubMed
description Technological advancements have led to the development of numerous wearable robotic devices for the physical assistance and restoration of human locomotion. While many challenges remain with respect to the mechanical design of such devices, it is at least equally challenging and important to develop strategies to control them in concert with the intentions of the user. This work reviews the state-of-the-art techniques for controlling portable active lower limb prosthetic and orthotic (P/O) devices in the context of locomotive activities of daily living (ADL), and considers how these can be interfaced with the user’s sensory-motor control system. This review underscores the practical challenges and opportunities associated with P/O control, which can be used to accelerate future developments in this field. Furthermore, this work provides a classification scheme for the comparison of the various control strategies. As a novel contribution, a general framework for the control of portable gait-assistance devices is proposed. This framework accounts for the physical and informatic interactions between the controller, the user, the environment, and the mechanical device itself. Such a treatment of P/Os – not as independent devices, but as actors within an ecosystem – is suggested to be necessary to structure the next generation of intelligent and multifunctional controllers. Each element of the proposed framework is discussed with respect to the role that it plays in the assistance of locomotion, along with how its states can be sensed as inputs to the controller. The reviewed controllers are shown to fit within different levels of a hierarchical scheme, which loosely resembles the structure and functionality of the nominal human central nervous system (CNS). Active and passive safety mechanisms are considered to be central aspects underlying all of P/O design and control, and are shown to be critical for regulatory approval of such devices for real-world use. The works discussed herein provide evidence that, while we are getting ever closer, significant challenges still exist for the development of controllers for portable powered P/O devices that can seamlessly integrate with the user’s neuromusculoskeletal system and are practical for use in locomotive ADL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4326520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43265202015-02-14 Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review Tucker, Michael R Olivier, Jeremy Pagel, Anna Bleuler, Hannes Bouri, Mohamed Lambercy, Olivier Millán, José del R Riener, Robert Vallery, Heike Gassert, Roger J Neuroeng Rehabil Review Technological advancements have led to the development of numerous wearable robotic devices for the physical assistance and restoration of human locomotion. While many challenges remain with respect to the mechanical design of such devices, it is at least equally challenging and important to develop strategies to control them in concert with the intentions of the user. This work reviews the state-of-the-art techniques for controlling portable active lower limb prosthetic and orthotic (P/O) devices in the context of locomotive activities of daily living (ADL), and considers how these can be interfaced with the user’s sensory-motor control system. This review underscores the practical challenges and opportunities associated with P/O control, which can be used to accelerate future developments in this field. Furthermore, this work provides a classification scheme for the comparison of the various control strategies. As a novel contribution, a general framework for the control of portable gait-assistance devices is proposed. This framework accounts for the physical and informatic interactions between the controller, the user, the environment, and the mechanical device itself. Such a treatment of P/Os – not as independent devices, but as actors within an ecosystem – is suggested to be necessary to structure the next generation of intelligent and multifunctional controllers. Each element of the proposed framework is discussed with respect to the role that it plays in the assistance of locomotion, along with how its states can be sensed as inputs to the controller. The reviewed controllers are shown to fit within different levels of a hierarchical scheme, which loosely resembles the structure and functionality of the nominal human central nervous system (CNS). Active and passive safety mechanisms are considered to be central aspects underlying all of P/O design and control, and are shown to be critical for regulatory approval of such devices for real-world use. The works discussed herein provide evidence that, while we are getting ever closer, significant challenges still exist for the development of controllers for portable powered P/O devices that can seamlessly integrate with the user’s neuromusculoskeletal system and are practical for use in locomotive ADL. BioMed Central 2015-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4326520/ /pubmed/25557982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-12-1 Text en © Tucker et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Tucker, Michael R
Olivier, Jeremy
Pagel, Anna
Bleuler, Hannes
Bouri, Mohamed
Lambercy, Olivier
Millán, José del R
Riener, Robert
Vallery, Heike
Gassert, Roger
Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
title Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
title_full Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
title_fullStr Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
title_full_unstemmed Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
title_short Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
title_sort control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25557982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-12-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckermichaelr controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT olivierjeremy controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT pagelanna controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT bleulerhannes controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT bourimohamed controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT lambercyolivier controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT millanjosedelr controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT rienerrobert controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT valleryheike controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview
AT gassertroger controlstrategiesforactivelowerextremityprostheticsandorthoticsareview