Cargando…

EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS

In addition to an initial socket discomfort, ocular prosthesis (OP) installation may allow the adherence of fungi and/or bacteria due to the superficial characteristics of the prosthesis’ material, use of inadequate cleansing solutions and methods, or because the void located between the internal po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paranhos, Regina Márcia Zuccolotto Felippe, Batalhão, Carlos Henrique, Semprini, Marisa, Regalo, Simone Cecílio Hallak, Ito, Izabel Yoko, de Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000100008
_version_ 1782357033184395264
author Paranhos, Regina Márcia Zuccolotto Felippe
Batalhão, Carlos Henrique
Semprini, Marisa
Regalo, Simone Cecílio Hallak
Ito, Izabel Yoko
de Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello
author_facet Paranhos, Regina Márcia Zuccolotto Felippe
Batalhão, Carlos Henrique
Semprini, Marisa
Regalo, Simone Cecílio Hallak
Ito, Izabel Yoko
de Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello
author_sort Paranhos, Regina Márcia Zuccolotto Felippe
collection PubMed
description In addition to an initial socket discomfort, ocular prosthesis (OP) installation may allow the adherence of fungi and/or bacteria due to the superficial characteristics of the prosthesis’ material, use of inadequate cleansing solutions and methods, or because the void located between the internal portion of the prosthesis and the anophthalmic cavity (AC) mucosa. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate OP biofilm formation and the level of contamination of the internal portion of the OP and the AC in 24 patients. Material and Methods: Material was collected from the AC at the beginning of the study and 15 days after cleansing of the OP with 3 cleansing solutions: a neutral liquid soap, a multiuse solution for contact lens (Complete) and 0.12% chlorhexidine (Periogard). The collected materials were sowed in Petri dishes containing selective media for aerobic and facultative microorganisms, specifically staphylococci (Hipersalt agar with egg yolk), aerobic microorganisms (Brain Heart Infusion Blood Agar), streptococci (Mitis salivarius Agar), gram-negative bacilli (MacConkey Agar) and yeasts (Chromagar Candida(TM)), incubated at 35°C or 37°C and the number of colony forming units were counted. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA, Friedman’s test and Spearman’s correlation. Results: Aerobic microorganisms, gram-negative bacilli and S. aureus were found in the OP biofilm and in the AC. There was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the number of microorganisms before and after the use of the cleansing solutions. Conclusion: There was positive correlation with respect to the microorganisms present in the OP biofilm and AC for the 4 proposed treatments, indicating that the decrease of OP contamination leads to AC contamination as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4327209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43272092015-04-16 EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS Paranhos, Regina Márcia Zuccolotto Felippe Batalhão, Carlos Henrique Semprini, Marisa Regalo, Simone Cecílio Hallak Ito, Izabel Yoko de Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello J Appl Oral Sci Original Article In addition to an initial socket discomfort, ocular prosthesis (OP) installation may allow the adherence of fungi and/or bacteria due to the superficial characteristics of the prosthesis’ material, use of inadequate cleansing solutions and methods, or because the void located between the internal portion of the prosthesis and the anophthalmic cavity (AC) mucosa. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate OP biofilm formation and the level of contamination of the internal portion of the OP and the AC in 24 patients. Material and Methods: Material was collected from the AC at the beginning of the study and 15 days after cleansing of the OP with 3 cleansing solutions: a neutral liquid soap, a multiuse solution for contact lens (Complete) and 0.12% chlorhexidine (Periogard). The collected materials were sowed in Petri dishes containing selective media for aerobic and facultative microorganisms, specifically staphylococci (Hipersalt agar with egg yolk), aerobic microorganisms (Brain Heart Infusion Blood Agar), streptococci (Mitis salivarius Agar), gram-negative bacilli (MacConkey Agar) and yeasts (Chromagar Candida(TM)), incubated at 35°C or 37°C and the number of colony forming units were counted. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA, Friedman’s test and Spearman’s correlation. Results: Aerobic microorganisms, gram-negative bacilli and S. aureus were found in the OP biofilm and in the AC. There was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the number of microorganisms before and after the use of the cleansing solutions. Conclusion: There was positive correlation with respect to the microorganisms present in the OP biofilm and AC for the 4 proposed treatments, indicating that the decrease of OP contamination leads to AC contamination as well. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2007-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4327209/ /pubmed/19089097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000100008 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Paranhos, Regina Márcia Zuccolotto Felippe
Batalhão, Carlos Henrique
Semprini, Marisa
Regalo, Simone Cecílio Hallak
Ito, Izabel Yoko
de Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello
EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS
title EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS
title_full EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS
title_short EVALUATION OF OCULAR PROSTHESIS BIOFILM AND ANOPHTHALMIC CAVITY CONTAMINATION AFTER USE OF THREE CLEANSING SOLUTIONS
title_sort evaluation of ocular prosthesis biofilm and anophthalmic cavity contamination after use of three cleansing solutions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000100008
work_keys_str_mv AT paranhosreginamarciazuccolottofelippe evaluationofocularprosthesisbiofilmandanophthalmiccavitycontaminationafteruseofthreecleansingsolutions
AT batalhaocarloshenrique evaluationofocularprosthesisbiofilmandanophthalmiccavitycontaminationafteruseofthreecleansingsolutions
AT semprinimarisa evaluationofocularprosthesisbiofilmandanophthalmiccavitycontaminationafteruseofthreecleansingsolutions
AT regalosimonececiliohallak evaluationofocularprosthesisbiofilmandanophthalmiccavitycontaminationafteruseofthreecleansingsolutions
AT itoizabelyoko evaluationofocularprosthesisbiofilmandanophthalmiccavitycontaminationafteruseofthreecleansingsolutions
AT demattosmariadagloriachiarello evaluationofocularprosthesisbiofilmandanophthalmiccavitycontaminationafteruseofthreecleansingsolutions