Cargando…

SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to enamel and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of both metallic and polycarbonate brackets bonded under different conditions. Ninety bovine permanent mandibular incisors were embedded in acrylic resin using PVC rings as molds a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pithon, Matheus Melo, de Oliveira, Márlio Vinícius, Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira, Bolognese, Ana Maria, Romano, Fábio Lourenço
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000200010
_version_ 1782357041186078720
author Pithon, Matheus Melo
de Oliveira, Márlio Vinícius
Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Romano, Fábio Lourenço
author_facet Pithon, Matheus Melo
de Oliveira, Márlio Vinícius
Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Romano, Fábio Lourenço
author_sort Pithon, Matheus Melo
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to enamel and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of both metallic and polycarbonate brackets bonded under different conditions. Ninety bovine permanent mandibular incisors were embedded in acrylic resin using PVC rings as molds and assigned to 6 groups (n=15). In Groups 1 (control) and 3, metallic and polycarbonate orthodontic brackets were, respectively, bonded to the enamel surfaces using Transbond XT composite according to the manufacturer's recommendations. In Groups 2 and 4, both types of brackets were bonded to enamel with Transbond XT composite, but XT primer was replaced by the OrthoPrimer agent. In Groups 5 and 6, the polycarbonate bracket bases were sandblasted with 50-μm aluminum-oxide particle stream and bonded to the enamel surfaces prepared under the same conditions described in Groups 3 and 4, respectively. After bonding, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and then submitted to shear bond strength test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results (MPa) showed no statistically significant difference between Groups 4 and 6 (p>0.05). Likewise, no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found among Groups 1, 2, and 5, although their results were significantly lower than those of Groups 4 and 6 (p<0.05). Group 3 had statistically significant lower bond strength than Groups 2, 4, and 6, but no statistically significant differences were found on comparison to Groups 1 and 5. A larger number of fractures at the bracket/composite interface were evidenced by the ARI scores. OrthoPrimer bonding agent yielded higher bond strength in the groups using either conventional or sandblasted polycarbonate brackets, which was not observed in the groups using metallic brackets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4327243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43272432015-04-22 SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS Pithon, Matheus Melo de Oliveira, Márlio Vinícius Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Bolognese, Ana Maria Romano, Fábio Lourenço J Appl Oral Sci Original Article The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to enamel and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of both metallic and polycarbonate brackets bonded under different conditions. Ninety bovine permanent mandibular incisors were embedded in acrylic resin using PVC rings as molds and assigned to 6 groups (n=15). In Groups 1 (control) and 3, metallic and polycarbonate orthodontic brackets were, respectively, bonded to the enamel surfaces using Transbond XT composite according to the manufacturer's recommendations. In Groups 2 and 4, both types of brackets were bonded to enamel with Transbond XT composite, but XT primer was replaced by the OrthoPrimer agent. In Groups 5 and 6, the polycarbonate bracket bases were sandblasted with 50-μm aluminum-oxide particle stream and bonded to the enamel surfaces prepared under the same conditions described in Groups 3 and 4, respectively. After bonding, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and then submitted to shear bond strength test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results (MPa) showed no statistically significant difference between Groups 4 and 6 (p>0.05). Likewise, no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found among Groups 1, 2, and 5, although their results were significantly lower than those of Groups 4 and 6 (p<0.05). Group 3 had statistically significant lower bond strength than Groups 2, 4, and 6, but no statistically significant differences were found on comparison to Groups 1 and 5. A larger number of fractures at the bracket/composite interface were evidenced by the ARI scores. OrthoPrimer bonding agent yielded higher bond strength in the groups using either conventional or sandblasted polycarbonate brackets, which was not observed in the groups using metallic brackets. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2007-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4327243/ /pubmed/19089115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000200010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pithon, Matheus Melo
de Oliveira, Márlio Vinícius
Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Romano, Fábio Lourenço
SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS
title SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS
title_full SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS
title_fullStr SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS
title_full_unstemmed SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS
title_short SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO ENAMEL UNDER DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT CONDITIONS
title_sort shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel under different surface treatment conditions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000200010
work_keys_str_mv AT pithonmatheusmelo shearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketstoenamelunderdifferentsurfacetreatmentconditions
AT deoliveiramarliovinicius shearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketstoenamelunderdifferentsurfacetreatmentconditions
AT ruellasantoniocarlosdeoliveira shearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketstoenamelunderdifferentsurfacetreatmentconditions
AT bologneseanamaria shearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketstoenamelunderdifferentsurfacetreatmentconditions
AT romanofabiolourenco shearbondstrengthoforthodonticbracketstoenamelunderdifferentsurfacetreatmentconditions