Cargando…

Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals

BACKGROUND: Unintended forgetfulness is the most common cause of medication nonadherence. MemoPatch(®) is an electronic skin patch intended to deliver discreet tactile medication reminder stimuli. This study aimed 1) to evaluate, within an experimental setup, the detectability and acceptability of f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abraham, Ivo, De Geest, Jan, De Geest, Wim, De Troy, Elke, MacDonald, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709509
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S72806
_version_ 1782357069519650816
author Abraham, Ivo
De Geest, Jan
De Geest, Wim
De Troy, Elke
MacDonald, Karen
author_facet Abraham, Ivo
De Geest, Jan
De Geest, Wim
De Troy, Elke
MacDonald, Karen
author_sort Abraham, Ivo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unintended forgetfulness is the most common cause of medication nonadherence. MemoPatch(®) is an electronic skin patch intended to deliver discreet tactile medication reminder stimuli. This study aimed 1) to evaluate, within an experimental setup, the detectability and acceptability of fifteen continuous bipolar pulse signals; 2) to identify variables, if any, associated with differential perception of the candidate reminder signals; and 3) to collect safety data as reported by subjects or observed by staff. METHODS: This was a laboratory experiment involving 147 healthy adult volunteers (55.1% female, 98.0% Caucasian, with age 41.8±16.0 years, body mass index [BMI] 24.7±4.4, upper body adiposity 28.5%±8.3% body fat, and skin impedance 367.6±140.8 Ω) and using an experimental version of the MemoPatch(®). Following four training signals administered in fixed order, subjects were exposed to a set of fifteen randomly sequenced signals varying in rise and fall time, width, and current, to be rated in terms of detectability (“too weak”, “appropriate”, or “too strong”) and acceptability. RESULTS: Ratings of “appropriate” were virtually independent of such variables as sex, BMI, upper body adiposity, and skin impedance at the patch location. Five signals were rated as “appropriate” by ≥67% of subjects and acceptable by ≥95% of subjects, virtually independently of the indicators of interest, and were retained as candidate signals for use in next stages of development and commercialization. Nine adverse events, none serious, were observed in six subjects. CONCLUSION: This study yielded five effective and safe candidate signals for potential use in the MemoPatch(®) device, all equally considered to be of appropriate detectability and high acceptability, in an experimental context. The signals were independent from, and therefore highly robust relative to, sex, BMI, upper body adiposity, and skin impedance at the patch site, lending additional generalizability to the signals and hence their potential relevance to broad commercial application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4327396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43273962015-02-23 Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals Abraham, Ivo De Geest, Jan De Geest, Wim De Troy, Elke MacDonald, Karen Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: Unintended forgetfulness is the most common cause of medication nonadherence. MemoPatch(®) is an electronic skin patch intended to deliver discreet tactile medication reminder stimuli. This study aimed 1) to evaluate, within an experimental setup, the detectability and acceptability of fifteen continuous bipolar pulse signals; 2) to identify variables, if any, associated with differential perception of the candidate reminder signals; and 3) to collect safety data as reported by subjects or observed by staff. METHODS: This was a laboratory experiment involving 147 healthy adult volunteers (55.1% female, 98.0% Caucasian, with age 41.8±16.0 years, body mass index [BMI] 24.7±4.4, upper body adiposity 28.5%±8.3% body fat, and skin impedance 367.6±140.8 Ω) and using an experimental version of the MemoPatch(®). Following four training signals administered in fixed order, subjects were exposed to a set of fifteen randomly sequenced signals varying in rise and fall time, width, and current, to be rated in terms of detectability (“too weak”, “appropriate”, or “too strong”) and acceptability. RESULTS: Ratings of “appropriate” were virtually independent of such variables as sex, BMI, upper body adiposity, and skin impedance at the patch location. Five signals were rated as “appropriate” by ≥67% of subjects and acceptable by ≥95% of subjects, virtually independently of the indicators of interest, and were retained as candidate signals for use in next stages of development and commercialization. Nine adverse events, none serious, were observed in six subjects. CONCLUSION: This study yielded five effective and safe candidate signals for potential use in the MemoPatch(®) device, all equally considered to be of appropriate detectability and high acceptability, in an experimental context. The signals were independent from, and therefore highly robust relative to, sex, BMI, upper body adiposity, and skin impedance at the patch site, lending additional generalizability to the signals and hence their potential relevance to broad commercial application. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4327396/ /pubmed/25709509 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S72806 Text en © 2015 Abraham et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Abraham, Ivo
De Geest, Jan
De Geest, Wim
De Troy, Elke
MacDonald, Karen
Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals
title Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals
title_full Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals
title_fullStr Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals
title_full_unstemmed Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals
title_short Detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the MemoPatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals
title_sort detectability and acceptability of continuous pulse signals for the memopatch(®) device, an electronic skin patch intended to deliver tactile medication reminder signals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709509
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S72806
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamivo detectabilityandacceptabilityofcontinuouspulsesignalsforthememopatchdeviceanelectronicskinpatchintendedtodelivertactilemedicationremindersignals
AT degeestjan detectabilityandacceptabilityofcontinuouspulsesignalsforthememopatchdeviceanelectronicskinpatchintendedtodelivertactilemedicationremindersignals
AT degeestwim detectabilityandacceptabilityofcontinuouspulsesignalsforthememopatchdeviceanelectronicskinpatchintendedtodelivertactilemedicationremindersignals
AT detroyelke detectabilityandacceptabilityofcontinuouspulsesignalsforthememopatchdeviceanelectronicskinpatchintendedtodelivertactilemedicationremindersignals
AT macdonaldkaren detectabilityandacceptabilityofcontinuouspulsesignalsforthememopatchdeviceanelectronicskinpatchintendedtodelivertactilemedicationremindersignals