Cargando…

EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS

The centric relation is a mandibular position that determines a balance relation among the temporomandibular joints, the chew muscles and the occlusion. This position makes possible to the dentist to plan and to execute oral rehabilitation respecting the physiological principles of the stomatognathi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paixão, Fernanda, Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e, Silva, Frederico Andrade e, Ramos, Guilherme da Gama, Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000400007
_version_ 1782357077208858624
author Paixão, Fernanda
Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e
Silva, Frederico Andrade e
Ramos, Guilherme da Gama
Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus
author_facet Paixão, Fernanda
Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e
Silva, Frederico Andrade e
Ramos, Guilherme da Gama
Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus
author_sort Paixão, Fernanda
collection PubMed
description The centric relation is a mandibular position that determines a balance relation among the temporomandibular joints, the chew muscles and the occlusion. This position makes possible to the dentist to plan and to execute oral rehabilitation respecting the physiological principles of the stomatognathic system. The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of centric relation records obtained using two techniques: Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing. Twenty volunteers (14 females and 6 males) with no dental loss, presenting occlusal contacts according to those described in Angle’s I classification and without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were selected. All volunteers were submitted five times with a 1-week interval, always in the same schedule, to the Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and to the Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing with aid of an intraoral apparatus. The average standard error of each technique was calculated (Bilateral Manipulation 0.94 and Gothic Arch Tracing 0.27). Shapiro-Wilk test was applied and the results allowed application of Student’s t-test (sampling error of 5%). The techniques showed different degrees of variability. The Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing was found to be more accurate than the Bilateral Manipulation in reproducing the centric relation records.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4327429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43274292015-04-16 EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS Paixão, Fernanda Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e Silva, Frederico Andrade e Ramos, Guilherme da Gama Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus J Appl Oral Sci Original Article The centric relation is a mandibular position that determines a balance relation among the temporomandibular joints, the chew muscles and the occlusion. This position makes possible to the dentist to plan and to execute oral rehabilitation respecting the physiological principles of the stomatognathic system. The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of centric relation records obtained using two techniques: Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing. Twenty volunteers (14 females and 6 males) with no dental loss, presenting occlusal contacts according to those described in Angle’s I classification and without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were selected. All volunteers were submitted five times with a 1-week interval, always in the same schedule, to the Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and to the Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing with aid of an intraoral apparatus. The average standard error of each technique was calculated (Bilateral Manipulation 0.94 and Gothic Arch Tracing 0.27). Shapiro-Wilk test was applied and the results allowed application of Student’s t-test (sampling error of 5%). The techniques showed different degrees of variability. The Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing was found to be more accurate than the Bilateral Manipulation in reproducing the centric relation records. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2007-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4327429/ /pubmed/19089144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000400007 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Paixão, Fernanda
Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e
Silva, Frederico Andrade e
Ramos, Guilherme da Gama
Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus
EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS
title EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS
title_full EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS
title_short EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS
title_sort evaluation of the reproducibility of two techniques used to determine and record centric relation in angle’s class i patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000400007
work_keys_str_mv AT paixaofernanda evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients
AT silvawilkensaureliobuarquee evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients
AT silvafredericoandradee evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients
AT ramosguilhermedagama evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients
AT cruzmonicavieiradejesus evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients