Cargando…
EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS
The centric relation is a mandibular position that determines a balance relation among the temporomandibular joints, the chew muscles and the occlusion. This position makes possible to the dentist to plan and to execute oral rehabilitation respecting the physiological principles of the stomatognathi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000400007 |
_version_ | 1782357077208858624 |
---|---|
author | Paixão, Fernanda Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e Silva, Frederico Andrade e Ramos, Guilherme da Gama Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus |
author_facet | Paixão, Fernanda Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e Silva, Frederico Andrade e Ramos, Guilherme da Gama Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus |
author_sort | Paixão, Fernanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | The centric relation is a mandibular position that determines a balance relation among the temporomandibular joints, the chew muscles and the occlusion. This position makes possible to the dentist to plan and to execute oral rehabilitation respecting the physiological principles of the stomatognathic system. The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of centric relation records obtained using two techniques: Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing. Twenty volunteers (14 females and 6 males) with no dental loss, presenting occlusal contacts according to those described in Angle’s I classification and without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were selected. All volunteers were submitted five times with a 1-week interval, always in the same schedule, to the Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and to the Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing with aid of an intraoral apparatus. The average standard error of each technique was calculated (Bilateral Manipulation 0.94 and Gothic Arch Tracing 0.27). Shapiro-Wilk test was applied and the results allowed application of Student’s t-test (sampling error of 5%). The techniques showed different degrees of variability. The Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing was found to be more accurate than the Bilateral Manipulation in reproducing the centric relation records. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4327429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43274292015-04-16 EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS Paixão, Fernanda Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e Silva, Frederico Andrade e Ramos, Guilherme da Gama Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus J Appl Oral Sci Original Article The centric relation is a mandibular position that determines a balance relation among the temporomandibular joints, the chew muscles and the occlusion. This position makes possible to the dentist to plan and to execute oral rehabilitation respecting the physiological principles of the stomatognathic system. The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of centric relation records obtained using two techniques: Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing. Twenty volunteers (14 females and 6 males) with no dental loss, presenting occlusal contacts according to those described in Angle’s I classification and without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were selected. All volunteers were submitted five times with a 1-week interval, always in the same schedule, to the Dawson’s Bilateral Manipulation and to the Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing with aid of an intraoral apparatus. The average standard error of each technique was calculated (Bilateral Manipulation 0.94 and Gothic Arch Tracing 0.27). Shapiro-Wilk test was applied and the results allowed application of Student’s t-test (sampling error of 5%). The techniques showed different degrees of variability. The Gysi’s Gothic Arch Tracing was found to be more accurate than the Bilateral Manipulation in reproducing the centric relation records. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2007-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4327429/ /pubmed/19089144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000400007 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Paixão, Fernanda Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e Silva, Frederico Andrade e Ramos, Guilherme da Gama Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS |
title | EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS |
title_full | EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS |
title_fullStr | EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS |
title_full_unstemmed | EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS |
title_short | EVALUATION OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE AND RECORD CENTRIC RELATION IN ANGLE’S CLASS I PATIENTS |
title_sort | evaluation of the reproducibility of two techniques used to determine and record centric relation in angle’s class i patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000400007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paixaofernanda evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients AT silvawilkensaureliobuarquee evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients AT silvafredericoandradee evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients AT ramosguilhermedagama evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients AT cruzmonicavieiradejesus evaluationofthereproducibilityoftwotechniquesusedtodetermineandrecordcentricrelationinanglesclassipatients |