Cargando…

INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the cutting capacity of carbide burs sterilized with microwaves and traditional sterilization methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty burs were divided into 5 groups according to the sterilization methods: dry heat (G1), autoclave (G2), microwave irradiation (G3), glutara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fais, Laiza Maria Grassi, Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira, Adabo, Gelson Luis, da Silva, Regina Helena Barbosa Tavares, Marcelo, Caroline Canhizares, Guaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20027431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000600009
_version_ 1782357097961226240
author Fais, Laiza Maria Grassi
Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira
Adabo, Gelson Luis
da Silva, Regina Helena Barbosa Tavares
Marcelo, Caroline Canhizares
Guaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo
author_facet Fais, Laiza Maria Grassi
Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira
Adabo, Gelson Luis
da Silva, Regina Helena Barbosa Tavares
Marcelo, Caroline Canhizares
Guaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo
author_sort Fais, Laiza Maria Grassi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study compared the cutting capacity of carbide burs sterilized with microwaves and traditional sterilization methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty burs were divided into 5 groups according to the sterilization methods: dry heat (G1), autoclave (G2), microwave irradiation (G3), glutaraldehyde (G4) or control – no sterilization (G5). The burs were used to cut glass plates in a cutting machine set for twelve 2.5-min periods and, after each period, they were sterilized (except G5) following the protocol established for each group. The cutting capacity of the burs was determined by a weight-loss method. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test. RESULTS: The means of the cutting amount performed by each group after the 12 periods were G1 = 0.2167 ± 0.0627 g; G2 = 0.2077 ± 0.0231 g; G3 = 0.1980 ± 0.0326 g; G4 = 0.1203 ± 0.0459 g; G5 = 0.2642 ± 0.0359 g. There were statistically significant differences among the groups (p<0.05); only dry heat sterilization was similar to the control. CONCLUSION: Sterilization by dry heat was the method that least affected the cutting capacity of the carbide burs and microwave sterilization was not better than traditional sterilization methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4327518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43275182015-04-17 INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS Fais, Laiza Maria Grassi Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira Adabo, Gelson Luis da Silva, Regina Helena Barbosa Tavares Marcelo, Caroline Canhizares Guaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo J Appl Oral Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study compared the cutting capacity of carbide burs sterilized with microwaves and traditional sterilization methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty burs were divided into 5 groups according to the sterilization methods: dry heat (G1), autoclave (G2), microwave irradiation (G3), glutaraldehyde (G4) or control – no sterilization (G5). The burs were used to cut glass plates in a cutting machine set for twelve 2.5-min periods and, after each period, they were sterilized (except G5) following the protocol established for each group. The cutting capacity of the burs was determined by a weight-loss method. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test. RESULTS: The means of the cutting amount performed by each group after the 12 periods were G1 = 0.2167 ± 0.0627 g; G2 = 0.2077 ± 0.0231 g; G3 = 0.1980 ± 0.0326 g; G4 = 0.1203 ± 0.0459 g; G5 = 0.2642 ± 0.0359 g. There were statistically significant differences among the groups (p<0.05); only dry heat sterilization was similar to the control. CONCLUSION: Sterilization by dry heat was the method that least affected the cutting capacity of the carbide burs and microwave sterilization was not better than traditional sterilization methods. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2009-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4327518/ /pubmed/20027431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000600009 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fais, Laiza Maria Grassi
Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira
Adabo, Gelson Luis
da Silva, Regina Helena Barbosa Tavares
Marcelo, Caroline Canhizares
Guaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo
INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS
title INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS
title_full INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS
title_fullStr INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS
title_full_unstemmed INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS
title_short INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE STERILIZATION ON THE CUTTING CAPACITY OF CARBIDE BURS
title_sort influence of microwave sterilization on the cutting capacity of carbide burs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20027431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000600009
work_keys_str_mv AT faislaizamariagrassi influenceofmicrowavesterilizationonthecuttingcapacityofcarbideburs
AT pinelliligiaantunespereira influenceofmicrowavesterilizationonthecuttingcapacityofcarbideburs
AT adabogelsonluis influenceofmicrowavesterilizationonthecuttingcapacityofcarbideburs
AT dasilvareginahelenabarbosatavares influenceofmicrowavesterilizationonthecuttingcapacityofcarbideburs
AT marcelocarolinecanhizares influenceofmicrowavesterilizationonthecuttingcapacityofcarbideburs
AT guaglianonidaltongeraldo influenceofmicrowavesterilizationonthecuttingcapacityofcarbideburs