Cargando…

BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION

This study evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of the storage time of samples before the application of the cell lysis solution (CLS) for extracting DNA from buccal cells (BC). BC from the upper and lower gutter region were collected from 5 volunteers using special cytobrushes (Gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nedel, Fernanda, André, Dárvi de Almeida, de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira, Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves, Demarco, Flávio Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19274396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200008
_version_ 1782357114986954752
author Nedel, Fernanda
André, Dárvi de Almeida
de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira
Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
author_facet Nedel, Fernanda
André, Dárvi de Almeida
de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira
Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
author_sort Nedel, Fernanda
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of the storage time of samples before the application of the cell lysis solution (CLS) for extracting DNA from buccal cells (BC). BC from the upper and lower gutter region were collected from 5 volunteers using special cytobrushes (Gentra), totaling 3 collections for each individual. In the control group (n=10), CLS was applied soon after BC collection. In the other two groups, samples were stored at room temperature (n=10) or at 4°C (n=10). After CLS application, DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer 's instructions (Puregene DNA Buccal Cell Kit; Gentra Systems, Inc.). The DNA obtained was evaluated by two calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). The obtained data were submitted to one-way ANOVA. The means and standard deviations for DNA extracted under immediate, room temperature and cooling temperature conditions were 3.5 ± 0.7, 3.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 1.8 μg, respectively (p=0.385). No significant differences were found in relation to the amount of DNA for the different storage conditions. However, in the visual analysis of the DNA bands, no trace of DNA degradation was detected when CSL was applied soon after DNA collection, while DNA bands with degradation could be observed in the other groups. Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that CLS should be applied soon after DNA collection in order to obtain high-quality DNA from BC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4327587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43275872015-02-26 BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION Nedel, Fernanda André, Dárvi de Almeida de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco, Flávio Fernando J Appl Oral Sci Original Article This study evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of the storage time of samples before the application of the cell lysis solution (CLS) for extracting DNA from buccal cells (BC). BC from the upper and lower gutter region were collected from 5 volunteers using special cytobrushes (Gentra), totaling 3 collections for each individual. In the control group (n=10), CLS was applied soon after BC collection. In the other two groups, samples were stored at room temperature (n=10) or at 4°C (n=10). After CLS application, DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer 's instructions (Puregene DNA Buccal Cell Kit; Gentra Systems, Inc.). The DNA obtained was evaluated by two calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). The obtained data were submitted to one-way ANOVA. The means and standard deviations for DNA extracted under immediate, room temperature and cooling temperature conditions were 3.5 ± 0.7, 3.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 1.8 μg, respectively (p=0.385). No significant differences were found in relation to the amount of DNA for the different storage conditions. However, in the visual analysis of the DNA bands, no trace of DNA degradation was detected when CSL was applied soon after DNA collection, while DNA bands with degradation could be observed in the other groups. Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that CLS should be applied soon after DNA collection in order to obtain high-quality DNA from BC. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2009-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4327587/ /pubmed/19274396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200008 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nedel, Fernanda
André, Dárvi de Almeida
de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira
Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION
title BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION
title_full BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION
title_fullStr BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION
title_full_unstemmed BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION
title_short BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION
title_sort buccal cells submitted to three different storage conditions before dna extraction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19274396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200008
work_keys_str_mv AT nedelfernanda buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction
AT andredarvidealmeida buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction
AT deoliveiraisabeloliveira buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction
AT tarquiniosandrabeatrizchaves buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction
AT demarcoflaviofernando buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction