Cargando…
BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION
This study evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of the storage time of samples before the application of the cell lysis solution (CLS) for extracting DNA from buccal cells (BC). BC from the upper and lower gutter region were collected from 5 volunteers using special cytobrushes (Gen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19274396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200008 |
_version_ | 1782357114986954752 |
---|---|
author | Nedel, Fernanda André, Dárvi de Almeida de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco, Flávio Fernando |
author_facet | Nedel, Fernanda André, Dárvi de Almeida de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco, Flávio Fernando |
author_sort | Nedel, Fernanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of the storage time of samples before the application of the cell lysis solution (CLS) for extracting DNA from buccal cells (BC). BC from the upper and lower gutter region were collected from 5 volunteers using special cytobrushes (Gentra), totaling 3 collections for each individual. In the control group (n=10), CLS was applied soon after BC collection. In the other two groups, samples were stored at room temperature (n=10) or at 4°C (n=10). After CLS application, DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer 's instructions (Puregene DNA Buccal Cell Kit; Gentra Systems, Inc.). The DNA obtained was evaluated by two calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). The obtained data were submitted to one-way ANOVA. The means and standard deviations for DNA extracted under immediate, room temperature and cooling temperature conditions were 3.5 ± 0.7, 3.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 1.8 μg, respectively (p=0.385). No significant differences were found in relation to the amount of DNA for the different storage conditions. However, in the visual analysis of the DNA bands, no trace of DNA degradation was detected when CSL was applied soon after DNA collection, while DNA bands with degradation could be observed in the other groups. Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that CLS should be applied soon after DNA collection in order to obtain high-quality DNA from BC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4327587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43275872015-02-26 BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION Nedel, Fernanda André, Dárvi de Almeida de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco, Flávio Fernando J Appl Oral Sci Original Article This study evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of the storage time of samples before the application of the cell lysis solution (CLS) for extracting DNA from buccal cells (BC). BC from the upper and lower gutter region were collected from 5 volunteers using special cytobrushes (Gentra), totaling 3 collections for each individual. In the control group (n=10), CLS was applied soon after BC collection. In the other two groups, samples were stored at room temperature (n=10) or at 4°C (n=10). After CLS application, DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer 's instructions (Puregene DNA Buccal Cell Kit; Gentra Systems, Inc.). The DNA obtained was evaluated by two calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). The obtained data were submitted to one-way ANOVA. The means and standard deviations for DNA extracted under immediate, room temperature and cooling temperature conditions were 3.5 ± 0.7, 3.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 1.8 μg, respectively (p=0.385). No significant differences were found in relation to the amount of DNA for the different storage conditions. However, in the visual analysis of the DNA bands, no trace of DNA degradation was detected when CSL was applied soon after DNA collection, while DNA bands with degradation could be observed in the other groups. Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that CLS should be applied soon after DNA collection in order to obtain high-quality DNA from BC. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2009-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4327587/ /pubmed/19274396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200008 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nedel, Fernanda André, Dárvi de Almeida de Oliveira, Isabel Oliveira Tarquinio, Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco, Flávio Fernando BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION |
title | BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION |
title_full | BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION |
title_fullStr | BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION |
title_full_unstemmed | BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION |
title_short | BUCCAL CELLS SUBMITTED TO THREE DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS BEFORE DNA EXTRACTION |
title_sort | buccal cells submitted to three different storage conditions before dna extraction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19274396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nedelfernanda buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction AT andredarvidealmeida buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction AT deoliveiraisabeloliveira buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction AT tarquiniosandrabeatrizchaves buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction AT demarcoflaviofernando buccalcellssubmittedtothreedifferentstorageconditionsbeforednaextraction |