Cargando…
INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin-based luting cement irradiated with different light sources as well energy density through a ceramic sample. Three light-curing unit (LCUs) were tested: tungsten halogen light (HAL), light-emitting diode (LED) and xen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000300005 |
_version_ | 1782357139396755456 |
---|---|
author | Piva, Evandro Correr, Lourenço Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho Consani, Simonides Demarco, Flávio Fernando Powers, John Michael |
author_facet | Piva, Evandro Correr, Lourenço Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho Consani, Simonides Demarco, Flávio Fernando Powers, John Michael |
author_sort | Piva, Evandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin-based luting cement irradiated with different light sources as well energy density through a ceramic sample. Three light-curing unit (LCUs) were tested: tungsten halogen light (HAL), light-emitting diode (LED) and xenon plasma-arc (PAC) lamp. Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from a resin-based cement (Enforce). Three energy doses were used by modifying the irradiance (I) of each LCU and the irradiation time (T): 24 Jcm(-2) (I/2x2T), 24 Jcm(-2) (IxT) and 48 Jcm(-2) (Ix2T). Energy doses were applied through a 2.0-mm-thick ceramic sample (Duceram Plus). Three groups underwent direct irradiation over the resin cement with the different LCUs and a chemically-activated group served as a control. Thirteen groups were tested (n=10). Knoop hardness number (KHN) means were obtained from cross-sectional areas. Two-way ANOVA and the Holm-Sidak method were used for statistical comparisons of activation mode and energy doses (α=5%). Application of 48 J.cm(-2) energy dose through the ceramic using LED (50.5±2.8) and HAL (50.9±3.7) produced significantly higher KHN means (p<0.05) than the control (44.7±3.8). LED showed statistically similar performance to HAL. Only HAL showed a relationship between the increase of LCU energy dose and hardness increase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4327692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43276922015-04-22 INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT Piva, Evandro Correr, Lourenço Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho Consani, Simonides Demarco, Flávio Fernando Powers, John Michael J Appl Oral Sci Original Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin-based luting cement irradiated with different light sources as well energy density through a ceramic sample. Three light-curing unit (LCUs) were tested: tungsten halogen light (HAL), light-emitting diode (LED) and xenon plasma-arc (PAC) lamp. Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from a resin-based cement (Enforce). Three energy doses were used by modifying the irradiance (I) of each LCU and the irradiation time (T): 24 Jcm(-2) (I/2x2T), 24 Jcm(-2) (IxT) and 48 Jcm(-2) (Ix2T). Energy doses were applied through a 2.0-mm-thick ceramic sample (Duceram Plus). Three groups underwent direct irradiation over the resin cement with the different LCUs and a chemically-activated group served as a control. Thirteen groups were tested (n=10). Knoop hardness number (KHN) means were obtained from cross-sectional areas. Two-way ANOVA and the Holm-Sidak method were used for statistical comparisons of activation mode and energy doses (α=5%). Application of 48 J.cm(-2) energy dose through the ceramic using LED (50.5±2.8) and HAL (50.9±3.7) produced significantly higher KHN means (p<0.05) than the control (44.7±3.8). LED showed statistically similar performance to HAL. Only HAL showed a relationship between the increase of LCU energy dose and hardness increase. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2008-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4327692/ /pubmed/19089216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000300005 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Piva, Evandro Correr, Lourenço Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho Consani, Simonides Demarco, Flávio Fernando Powers, John Michael INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT |
title | INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT |
title_full | INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT |
title_fullStr | INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT |
title_full_unstemmed | INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT |
title_short | INFLUENCE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES ON KNOOP HARDNESS OF A DUAL-CURED RESIN CEMENT |
title_sort | influence of energy density of different light sources on knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin cement |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000300005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pivaevandro influenceofenergydensityofdifferentlightsourcesonknoophardnessofadualcuredresincement AT correrlourenco influenceofenergydensityofdifferentlightsourcesonknoophardnessofadualcuredresincement AT sinhoretimarioalexandrecoelho influenceofenergydensityofdifferentlightsourcesonknoophardnessofadualcuredresincement AT consanisimonides influenceofenergydensityofdifferentlightsourcesonknoophardnessofadualcuredresincement AT demarcoflaviofernando influenceofenergydensityofdifferentlightsourcesonknoophardnessofadualcuredresincement AT powersjohnmichael influenceofenergydensityofdifferentlightsourcesonknoophardnessofadualcuredresincement |