Cargando…
The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2 |
_version_ | 1782357159117324288 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Alison Charlesworth, Lisa Jacob, Ruth Kendrick, Denise Logan, Philippa Marshall, Fiona Montgomery, Alan Sach, Tracey Tan, Wei Walker, Maria Waring, Justin Whitham, Diane Sahota, Opinder |
author_facet | Watson, Alison Charlesworth, Lisa Jacob, Ruth Kendrick, Denise Logan, Philippa Marshall, Fiona Montgomery, Alan Sach, Tracey Tan, Wei Walker, Maria Waring, Justin Whitham, Diane Sahota, Opinder |
author_sort | Watson, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient’s rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70 years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91 days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISCRCTN94393315) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4327808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43278082015-02-14 The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Watson, Alison Charlesworth, Lisa Jacob, Ruth Kendrick, Denise Logan, Philippa Marshall, Fiona Montgomery, Alan Sach, Tracey Tan, Wei Walker, Maria Waring, Justin Whitham, Diane Sahota, Opinder Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient’s rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70 years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91 days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISCRCTN94393315) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4327808/ /pubmed/25886822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2 Text en © Watson et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Watson, Alison Charlesworth, Lisa Jacob, Ruth Kendrick, Denise Logan, Philippa Marshall, Fiona Montgomery, Alan Sach, Tracey Tan, Wei Walker, Maria Waring, Justin Whitham, Diane Sahota, Opinder The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | community in-reach and care transition (ciract) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonalison thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT charlesworthlisa thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jacobruth thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kendrickdenise thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT loganphilippa thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marshallfiona thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT montgomeryalan thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sachtracey thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tanwei thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walkermaria thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT waringjustin thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT whithamdiane thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sahotaopinder thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT watsonalison communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT charlesworthlisa communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jacobruth communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kendrickdenise communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT loganphilippa communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marshallfiona communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT montgomeryalan communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sachtracey communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tanwei communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walkermaria communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT waringjustin communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT whithamdiane communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sahotaopinder communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |