Cargando…

The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Alison, Charlesworth, Lisa, Jacob, Ruth, Kendrick, Denise, Logan, Philippa, Marshall, Fiona, Montgomery, Alan, Sach, Tracey, Tan, Wei, Walker, Maria, Waring, Justin, Whitham, Diane, Sahota, Opinder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2
_version_ 1782357159117324288
author Watson, Alison
Charlesworth, Lisa
Jacob, Ruth
Kendrick, Denise
Logan, Philippa
Marshall, Fiona
Montgomery, Alan
Sach, Tracey
Tan, Wei
Walker, Maria
Waring, Justin
Whitham, Diane
Sahota, Opinder
author_facet Watson, Alison
Charlesworth, Lisa
Jacob, Ruth
Kendrick, Denise
Logan, Philippa
Marshall, Fiona
Montgomery, Alan
Sach, Tracey
Tan, Wei
Walker, Maria
Waring, Justin
Whitham, Diane
Sahota, Opinder
author_sort Watson, Alison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient’s rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70 years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91 days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISCRCTN94393315) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4327808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43278082015-02-14 The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Watson, Alison Charlesworth, Lisa Jacob, Ruth Kendrick, Denise Logan, Philippa Marshall, Fiona Montgomery, Alan Sach, Tracey Tan, Wei Walker, Maria Waring, Justin Whitham, Diane Sahota, Opinder Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient’s rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70 years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91 days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISCRCTN94393315) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4327808/ /pubmed/25886822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2 Text en © Watson et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Watson, Alison
Charlesworth, Lisa
Jacob, Ruth
Kendrick, Denise
Logan, Philippa
Marshall, Fiona
Montgomery, Alan
Sach, Tracey
Tan, Wei
Walker, Maria
Waring, Justin
Whitham, Diane
Sahota, Opinder
The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort community in-reach and care transition (ciract) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonalison thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT charlesworthlisa thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jacobruth thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kendrickdenise thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT loganphilippa thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marshallfiona thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT montgomeryalan thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sachtracey thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tanwei thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walkermaria thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waringjustin thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT whithamdiane thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sahotaopinder thecommunityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT watsonalison communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT charlesworthlisa communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jacobruth communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kendrickdenise communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT loganphilippa communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marshallfiona communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT montgomeryalan communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sachtracey communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tanwei communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walkermaria communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waringjustin communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT whithamdiane communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sahotaopinder communityinreachandcaretransitionciractclinicalandcosteffectivenessstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial