Cargando…

Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of retrospective image fusion from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor. METHODS: Thirty patients with a suspicion of recurrence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Suenaga, Yuko, Ueno, Yoshiko, Kanda, Tomonori, Maeda, Tetsuo, Makihara, Natsuko, Ebina, Yasuhiko, Yamada, Hideto, Takahashi, Satoru, Sugimura, Kazuro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4328133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24129541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0777-6
_version_ 1782357191056949248
author Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Suenaga, Yuko
Ueno, Yoshiko
Kanda, Tomonori
Maeda, Tetsuo
Makihara, Natsuko
Ebina, Yasuhiko
Yamada, Hideto
Takahashi, Satoru
Sugimura, Kazuro
author_facet Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Suenaga, Yuko
Ueno, Yoshiko
Kanda, Tomonori
Maeda, Tetsuo
Makihara, Natsuko
Ebina, Yasuhiko
Yamada, Hideto
Takahashi, Satoru
Sugimura, Kazuro
author_sort Kitajima, Kazuhiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of retrospective image fusion from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor. METHODS: Thirty patients with a suspicion of recurrence of gynecological malignancy underwent inline contrast-enhanced PET/computed tomography (CT) and pelvic contrast-enhanced MRI for restaging. Diagnostic performance about the local recurrence, pelvic lymph node and bone metastasis and peritoneal lesion of PET/low-dose non-enhanced CT (PET/ldCT), PET/full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (PET/ceCT), contrast-enhanced MRI, and retrospective image fusion from PET and MRI (fused PET/MRI) were evaluated by two experienced readers. Final diagnoses were obtained by histopathological examinations, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for at least 6 months. McNemar test was employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Documented positive locally recurrent disease, pelvic lymph node and bone metastases, and peritoneal dissemination were present in 53.3, 26.7, 10.0, and 16.7 %, respectively. Patient-based sensitivity for detecting local recurrence, pelvic lymph node and bone metastasis and peritoneal lesion were 87.5, 87.5, 100 and 80.0 %, respectively, for fused PET/MRI, 87.5, 62.5, 66.7 and 60.0 %, respectively, for contrast-enhanced MRI, 62.5, 87.5, 66.7 and 80.0 %, respectively, for PET/ceCT, and 50.0, 87.5, 66.7 and 60.0 %, respectively, for PET/ldCT. The sensitivity of diagnosing local recurrence by fused PET/MRI was significantly better than that of PET/ldCT (p = 0.041). The patient-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence/metastasis were 91.3, 100 and 93.3 % for fused PET/MRI, 82.6, 100 and 86.7 % for contrast-enhanced MRI, 82.6, 100 and 86.7 % for PET/ceCT and 78.3, 85.7 and 80.0 % for PET/ldCT. CONCLUSION: Fused PET/MRI combines the individual advantages of MRI and PET, and is a valuable technique for assessment of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4328133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43281332015-02-20 Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI Kitajima, Kazuhiro Suenaga, Yuko Ueno, Yoshiko Kanda, Tomonori Maeda, Tetsuo Makihara, Natsuko Ebina, Yasuhiko Yamada, Hideto Takahashi, Satoru Sugimura, Kazuro Ann Nucl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of retrospective image fusion from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor. METHODS: Thirty patients with a suspicion of recurrence of gynecological malignancy underwent inline contrast-enhanced PET/computed tomography (CT) and pelvic contrast-enhanced MRI for restaging. Diagnostic performance about the local recurrence, pelvic lymph node and bone metastasis and peritoneal lesion of PET/low-dose non-enhanced CT (PET/ldCT), PET/full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (PET/ceCT), contrast-enhanced MRI, and retrospective image fusion from PET and MRI (fused PET/MRI) were evaluated by two experienced readers. Final diagnoses were obtained by histopathological examinations, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for at least 6 months. McNemar test was employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Documented positive locally recurrent disease, pelvic lymph node and bone metastases, and peritoneal dissemination were present in 53.3, 26.7, 10.0, and 16.7 %, respectively. Patient-based sensitivity for detecting local recurrence, pelvic lymph node and bone metastasis and peritoneal lesion were 87.5, 87.5, 100 and 80.0 %, respectively, for fused PET/MRI, 87.5, 62.5, 66.7 and 60.0 %, respectively, for contrast-enhanced MRI, 62.5, 87.5, 66.7 and 80.0 %, respectively, for PET/ceCT, and 50.0, 87.5, 66.7 and 60.0 %, respectively, for PET/ldCT. The sensitivity of diagnosing local recurrence by fused PET/MRI was significantly better than that of PET/ldCT (p = 0.041). The patient-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence/metastasis were 91.3, 100 and 93.3 % for fused PET/MRI, 82.6, 100 and 86.7 % for contrast-enhanced MRI, 82.6, 100 and 86.7 % for PET/ceCT and 78.3, 85.7 and 80.0 % for PET/ldCT. CONCLUSION: Fused PET/MRI combines the individual advantages of MRI and PET, and is a valuable technique for assessment of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological cancers. Springer Japan 2013-10-16 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4328133/ /pubmed/24129541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0777-6 Text en © The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2013
spellingShingle Original Article
Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Suenaga, Yuko
Ueno, Yoshiko
Kanda, Tomonori
Maeda, Tetsuo
Makihara, Natsuko
Ebina, Yasuhiko
Yamada, Hideto
Takahashi, Satoru
Sugimura, Kazuro
Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_full Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_fullStr Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_full_unstemmed Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_short Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI
title_sort value of fusion of pet and mri in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with (18)f-fdg contrast-enhanced pet/ct and pelvic mri
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4328133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24129541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0777-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kitajimakazuhiro valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT suenagayuko valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT uenoyoshiko valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT kandatomonori valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT maedatetsuo valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT makiharanatsuko valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT ebinayasuhiko valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT yamadahideto valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT takahashisatoru valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri
AT sugimurakazuro valueoffusionofpetandmriinthedetectionofintrapelvicrecurrenceofgynecologicaltumorcomparisonwith18ffdgcontrastenhancedpetctandpelvicmri