Cargando…

Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status

We augment discussions about the Good Environmental Status of the North Sea by developing two extreme visions and assessing their societal benefits. One vision (‘Then’) assumes restoration of benthic functioning; we contend that trawling had already degraded the southern North Sea a century ago. Ava...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilbert, Alison J., McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail, Langmead, Olivia, Mee, Laurence, Vermaat, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24859919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5
_version_ 1782357393637638144
author Gilbert, Alison J.
McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail
Langmead, Olivia
Mee, Laurence
Vermaat, Jan
author_facet Gilbert, Alison J.
McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail
Langmead, Olivia
Mee, Laurence
Vermaat, Jan
author_sort Gilbert, Alison J.
collection PubMed
description We augment discussions about the Good Environmental Status of the North Sea by developing two extreme visions and assessing their societal benefits. One vision (‘Then’) assumes restoration of benthic functioning; we contend that trawling had already degraded the southern North Sea a century ago. Available information is used to speculate about benthic functioning in a relatively undisturbed southern North Sea. The second vision (‘Now’) draws on recent benthic functioning. The supply of five ecosystem services, supported by benthic functioning, is discussed. ‘Then’ offers confidence in the sustainable supply of diverse services but restoration of past function is uncertain and likely to be paired with costs, notably trawling restraints. ‘Now’ delivers known and valued services but sustained delivery is threatened by, for example, climate change. We do not advocate either vision. Our purpose is to stimulate debate about what society wants, and might receive, from the future southern North Sea. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4329130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43291302015-02-19 Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status Gilbert, Alison J. McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail Langmead, Olivia Mee, Laurence Vermaat, Jan Ambio Perspective We augment discussions about the Good Environmental Status of the North Sea by developing two extreme visions and assessing their societal benefits. One vision (‘Then’) assumes restoration of benthic functioning; we contend that trawling had already degraded the southern North Sea a century ago. Available information is used to speculate about benthic functioning in a relatively undisturbed southern North Sea. The second vision (‘Now’) draws on recent benthic functioning. The supply of five ecosystem services, supported by benthic functioning, is discussed. ‘Then’ offers confidence in the sustainable supply of diverse services but restoration of past function is uncertain and likely to be paired with costs, notably trawling restraints. ‘Now’ delivers known and valued services but sustained delivery is threatened by, for example, climate change. We do not advocate either vision. Our purpose is to stimulate debate about what society wants, and might receive, from the future southern North Sea. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2014-05-24 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4329130/ /pubmed/24859919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Gilbert, Alison J.
McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail
Langmead, Olivia
Mee, Laurence
Vermaat, Jan
Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status
title Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status
title_full Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status
title_fullStr Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status
title_full_unstemmed Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status
title_short Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status
title_sort visions for the north sea: the societal dilemma behind specifying good environmental status
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24859919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbertalisonj visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus
AT mcquattersgollopabigail visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus
AT langmeadolivia visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus
AT meelaurence visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus
AT vermaatjan visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus