Cargando…
Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status
We augment discussions about the Good Environmental Status of the North Sea by developing two extreme visions and assessing their societal benefits. One vision (‘Then’) assumes restoration of benthic functioning; we contend that trawling had already degraded the southern North Sea a century ago. Ava...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24859919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5 |
_version_ | 1782357393637638144 |
---|---|
author | Gilbert, Alison J. McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail Langmead, Olivia Mee, Laurence Vermaat, Jan |
author_facet | Gilbert, Alison J. McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail Langmead, Olivia Mee, Laurence Vermaat, Jan |
author_sort | Gilbert, Alison J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We augment discussions about the Good Environmental Status of the North Sea by developing two extreme visions and assessing their societal benefits. One vision (‘Then’) assumes restoration of benthic functioning; we contend that trawling had already degraded the southern North Sea a century ago. Available information is used to speculate about benthic functioning in a relatively undisturbed southern North Sea. The second vision (‘Now’) draws on recent benthic functioning. The supply of five ecosystem services, supported by benthic functioning, is discussed. ‘Then’ offers confidence in the sustainable supply of diverse services but restoration of past function is uncertain and likely to be paired with costs, notably trawling restraints. ‘Now’ delivers known and valued services but sustained delivery is threatened by, for example, climate change. We do not advocate either vision. Our purpose is to stimulate debate about what society wants, and might receive, from the future southern North Sea. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4329130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43291302015-02-19 Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status Gilbert, Alison J. McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail Langmead, Olivia Mee, Laurence Vermaat, Jan Ambio Perspective We augment discussions about the Good Environmental Status of the North Sea by developing two extreme visions and assessing their societal benefits. One vision (‘Then’) assumes restoration of benthic functioning; we contend that trawling had already degraded the southern North Sea a century ago. Available information is used to speculate about benthic functioning in a relatively undisturbed southern North Sea. The second vision (‘Now’) draws on recent benthic functioning. The supply of five ecosystem services, supported by benthic functioning, is discussed. ‘Then’ offers confidence in the sustainable supply of diverse services but restoration of past function is uncertain and likely to be paired with costs, notably trawling restraints. ‘Now’ delivers known and valued services but sustained delivery is threatened by, for example, climate change. We do not advocate either vision. Our purpose is to stimulate debate about what society wants, and might receive, from the future southern North Sea. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2014-05-24 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4329130/ /pubmed/24859919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Gilbert, Alison J. McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail Langmead, Olivia Mee, Laurence Vermaat, Jan Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status |
title | Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status |
title_full | Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status |
title_fullStr | Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status |
title_full_unstemmed | Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status |
title_short | Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status |
title_sort | visions for the north sea: the societal dilemma behind specifying good environmental status |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24859919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilbertalisonj visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus AT mcquattersgollopabigail visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus AT langmeadolivia visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus AT meelaurence visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus AT vermaatjan visionsforthenorthseathesocietaldilemmabehindspecifyinggoodenvironmentalstatus |