Cargando…

Macular Thickness and Amblyopia

PURPOSE: To compare macular thickness in children with functional amblyopia and those without amblyopia using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 93 children aged 3–10 years including 44 cases with unilateral amblyopia and 49 subjects without amblyop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajavi, Zhale, Moghadasifar, Hossein, Feizi, Mohadese, Haftabadi, Narges, Hadavand, Reza, Yaseri, Mehdi, Sheibani, Kourosh, Norouzi, Ghazal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.150827
_version_ 1782357479785496576
author Rajavi, Zhale
Moghadasifar, Hossein
Feizi, Mohadese
Haftabadi, Narges
Hadavand, Reza
Yaseri, Mehdi
Sheibani, Kourosh
Norouzi, Ghazal
author_facet Rajavi, Zhale
Moghadasifar, Hossein
Feizi, Mohadese
Haftabadi, Narges
Hadavand, Reza
Yaseri, Mehdi
Sheibani, Kourosh
Norouzi, Ghazal
author_sort Rajavi, Zhale
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare macular thickness in children with functional amblyopia and those without amblyopia using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 93 children aged 3–10 years including 44 cases with unilateral amblyopia and 49 subjects without amblyopia. Amblyopic eyes were considered as the case group and their fellow eyes as internal controls; eyes of non-amblyopic children served as the external control. Macular thickness of all eyes were measured by optical coherence tomography in the center (foveola), 1 mm ring (fovea), and 3 and 6 mm rings and compared. RESULTS: Although macular thickness was generally not different between the study groups, there was a significant difference in central macular thickness between eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia and the external controls (P = 0.037). Foveal thickness difference exceeding 10 microns between fellow eyes was detected in a larger number of amblyopic children as compared to non-amblyopic controls (P = 0.002). Mean foveal thickness was greater in boys (P = 0.037) but there was no significant difference in foveal thickness among various types of refractive errors. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant relationship between macular thickness and amblyopia, foveolar thickness in eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia was significantly greater than the external controls. Further studies with more cases of moderate to severe amblyopia are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4329709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43297092015-02-23 Macular Thickness and Amblyopia Rajavi, Zhale Moghadasifar, Hossein Feizi, Mohadese Haftabadi, Narges Hadavand, Reza Yaseri, Mehdi Sheibani, Kourosh Norouzi, Ghazal J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare macular thickness in children with functional amblyopia and those without amblyopia using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 93 children aged 3–10 years including 44 cases with unilateral amblyopia and 49 subjects without amblyopia. Amblyopic eyes were considered as the case group and their fellow eyes as internal controls; eyes of non-amblyopic children served as the external control. Macular thickness of all eyes were measured by optical coherence tomography in the center (foveola), 1 mm ring (fovea), and 3 and 6 mm rings and compared. RESULTS: Although macular thickness was generally not different between the study groups, there was a significant difference in central macular thickness between eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia and the external controls (P = 0.037). Foveal thickness difference exceeding 10 microns between fellow eyes was detected in a larger number of amblyopic children as compared to non-amblyopic controls (P = 0.002). Mean foveal thickness was greater in boys (P = 0.037) but there was no significant difference in foveal thickness among various types of refractive errors. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant relationship between macular thickness and amblyopia, foveolar thickness in eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia was significantly greater than the external controls. Further studies with more cases of moderate to severe amblyopia are recommended. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4329709/ /pubmed/25709774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.150827 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rajavi, Zhale
Moghadasifar, Hossein
Feizi, Mohadese
Haftabadi, Narges
Hadavand, Reza
Yaseri, Mehdi
Sheibani, Kourosh
Norouzi, Ghazal
Macular Thickness and Amblyopia
title Macular Thickness and Amblyopia
title_full Macular Thickness and Amblyopia
title_fullStr Macular Thickness and Amblyopia
title_full_unstemmed Macular Thickness and Amblyopia
title_short Macular Thickness and Amblyopia
title_sort macular thickness and amblyopia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.150827
work_keys_str_mv AT rajavizhale macularthicknessandamblyopia
AT moghadasifarhossein macularthicknessandamblyopia
AT feizimohadese macularthicknessandamblyopia
AT haftabadinarges macularthicknessandamblyopia
AT hadavandreza macularthicknessandamblyopia
AT yaserimehdi macularthicknessandamblyopia
AT sheibanikourosh macularthicknessandamblyopia
AT norouzighazal macularthicknessandamblyopia