Cargando…
Macular Thickness and Amblyopia
PURPOSE: To compare macular thickness in children with functional amblyopia and those without amblyopia using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 93 children aged 3–10 years including 44 cases with unilateral amblyopia and 49 subjects without amblyop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.150827 |
_version_ | 1782357479785496576 |
---|---|
author | Rajavi, Zhale Moghadasifar, Hossein Feizi, Mohadese Haftabadi, Narges Hadavand, Reza Yaseri, Mehdi Sheibani, Kourosh Norouzi, Ghazal |
author_facet | Rajavi, Zhale Moghadasifar, Hossein Feizi, Mohadese Haftabadi, Narges Hadavand, Reza Yaseri, Mehdi Sheibani, Kourosh Norouzi, Ghazal |
author_sort | Rajavi, Zhale |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare macular thickness in children with functional amblyopia and those without amblyopia using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 93 children aged 3–10 years including 44 cases with unilateral amblyopia and 49 subjects without amblyopia. Amblyopic eyes were considered as the case group and their fellow eyes as internal controls; eyes of non-amblyopic children served as the external control. Macular thickness of all eyes were measured by optical coherence tomography in the center (foveola), 1 mm ring (fovea), and 3 and 6 mm rings and compared. RESULTS: Although macular thickness was generally not different between the study groups, there was a significant difference in central macular thickness between eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia and the external controls (P = 0.037). Foveal thickness difference exceeding 10 microns between fellow eyes was detected in a larger number of amblyopic children as compared to non-amblyopic controls (P = 0.002). Mean foveal thickness was greater in boys (P = 0.037) but there was no significant difference in foveal thickness among various types of refractive errors. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant relationship between macular thickness and amblyopia, foveolar thickness in eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia was significantly greater than the external controls. Further studies with more cases of moderate to severe amblyopia are recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4329709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43297092015-02-23 Macular Thickness and Amblyopia Rajavi, Zhale Moghadasifar, Hossein Feizi, Mohadese Haftabadi, Narges Hadavand, Reza Yaseri, Mehdi Sheibani, Kourosh Norouzi, Ghazal J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare macular thickness in children with functional amblyopia and those without amblyopia using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 93 children aged 3–10 years including 44 cases with unilateral amblyopia and 49 subjects without amblyopia. Amblyopic eyes were considered as the case group and their fellow eyes as internal controls; eyes of non-amblyopic children served as the external control. Macular thickness of all eyes were measured by optical coherence tomography in the center (foveola), 1 mm ring (fovea), and 3 and 6 mm rings and compared. RESULTS: Although macular thickness was generally not different between the study groups, there was a significant difference in central macular thickness between eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia and the external controls (P = 0.037). Foveal thickness difference exceeding 10 microns between fellow eyes was detected in a larger number of amblyopic children as compared to non-amblyopic controls (P = 0.002). Mean foveal thickness was greater in boys (P = 0.037) but there was no significant difference in foveal thickness among various types of refractive errors. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant relationship between macular thickness and amblyopia, foveolar thickness in eyes with moderate to severe amblyopia was significantly greater than the external controls. Further studies with more cases of moderate to severe amblyopia are recommended. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4329709/ /pubmed/25709774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.150827 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rajavi, Zhale Moghadasifar, Hossein Feizi, Mohadese Haftabadi, Narges Hadavand, Reza Yaseri, Mehdi Sheibani, Kourosh Norouzi, Ghazal Macular Thickness and Amblyopia |
title | Macular Thickness and Amblyopia |
title_full | Macular Thickness and Amblyopia |
title_fullStr | Macular Thickness and Amblyopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Macular Thickness and Amblyopia |
title_short | Macular Thickness and Amblyopia |
title_sort | macular thickness and amblyopia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.150827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajavizhale macularthicknessandamblyopia AT moghadasifarhossein macularthicknessandamblyopia AT feizimohadese macularthicknessandamblyopia AT haftabadinarges macularthicknessandamblyopia AT hadavandreza macularthicknessandamblyopia AT yaserimehdi macularthicknessandamblyopia AT sheibanikourosh macularthicknessandamblyopia AT norouzighazal macularthicknessandamblyopia |