Cargando…

Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning

It is widely known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). In this study, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of visual symbols when they cannot detect them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kido, Kaede, Makioka, Shogo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076
_version_ 1782357493606776832
author Kido, Kaede
Makioka, Shogo
author_facet Kido, Kaede
Makioka, Shogo
author_sort Kido, Kaede
collection PubMed
description It is widely known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). In this study, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of visual symbols when they cannot detect them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols were presented to one eye under continuous flash suppression (CFS). Perception of the symbols was completely suppressed by the flash patterns presented to the other eye [binocular rivalry (BR)]. During the test phase, the detection latency was faster for symbols located later in the triplets or quadruplets. These results indicate that serial order learning occurs even when the participants cannot detect the stimuli. We also found that detection became slower for the last item of the triplets or quadruplets. This phenomenon occurred only when the participants were familiarized with the symbols under CFS, suggesting that the subsequent symbols interfered with the processing of the target symbol when conscious perception was suppressed. We further examined the nature of the interference and found that it occurred only when the subsequent symbol was not fixed. This result suggests that serial order learning under BR is restricted to fixed order sequences. Statistical learning of the symbols’ transition probability might not occur when the participants cannot detect the symbols. We confirmed this hypothesis by conducting another experiment wherein the transition probability of the symbol sequence was manipulated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4329799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43297992015-03-11 Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning Kido, Kaede Makioka, Shogo Front Psychol Psychology It is widely known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). In this study, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of visual symbols when they cannot detect them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols were presented to one eye under continuous flash suppression (CFS). Perception of the symbols was completely suppressed by the flash patterns presented to the other eye [binocular rivalry (BR)]. During the test phase, the detection latency was faster for symbols located later in the triplets or quadruplets. These results indicate that serial order learning occurs even when the participants cannot detect the stimuli. We also found that detection became slower for the last item of the triplets or quadruplets. This phenomenon occurred only when the participants were familiarized with the symbols under CFS, suggesting that the subsequent symbols interfered with the processing of the target symbol when conscious perception was suppressed. We further examined the nature of the interference and found that it occurred only when the subsequent symbol was not fixed. This result suggests that serial order learning under BR is restricted to fixed order sequences. Statistical learning of the symbols’ transition probability might not occur when the participants cannot detect the symbols. We confirmed this hypothesis by conducting another experiment wherein the transition probability of the symbol sequence was manipulated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4329799/ /pubmed/25762947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076 Text en Copyright © 2015 Kido and Makioka. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kido, Kaede
Makioka, Shogo
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_full Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_fullStr Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_full_unstemmed Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_short Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_sort serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076
work_keys_str_mv AT kidokaede serialorderlearningofsubliminalvisualstimulievidenceofmultistagelearning
AT makiokashogo serialorderlearningofsubliminalvisualstimulievidenceofmultistagelearning