Cargando…

Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects

The perceptual processes that mediate the ability to efficiently represent object 3D structure are still not fully understood. The current study was aimed to shed light on these processes by utilizing spatially possible and impossible objects that could not be created in real 3D space. Despite being...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freud, Erez, Hadad, Bat-Sheva, Avidan, Galia, Ganel, Tzvi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00094
_version_ 1782357494065004544
author Freud, Erez
Hadad, Bat-Sheva
Avidan, Galia
Ganel, Tzvi
author_facet Freud, Erez
Hadad, Bat-Sheva
Avidan, Galia
Ganel, Tzvi
author_sort Freud, Erez
collection PubMed
description The perceptual processes that mediate the ability to efficiently represent object 3D structure are still not fully understood. The current study was aimed to shed light on these processes by utilizing spatially possible and impossible objects that could not be created in real 3D space. Despite being perceived as exceptionally unusual, impossible objects still possess fundamental Gestalt attributes and valid local depth cues that may support their initial successful representation. Based on this notion and on recent findings from our lab, we hypothesized that the initial representation of impossible objects would involve common mechanisms to those mediating typical object perception while the perceived differences between possible and impossible objects would emerge later along the processing hierarchy. In Experiment 1, participants preformed same/different classifications of two markers superimposed on a display containing two objects (possible or impossible). Faster reaction times were observed for displays in which the markers were superimposed on the same object (“object-based benefit”). Importantly, this benefit was similar for possible and impossible objects, suggesting that the representations of the two object categories rely on similar perceptual organization processes. Yet, responses for impossible objects were slower compared to possible objects. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the origin of this effect. Participants classified the location of two markers while exposure duration was manipulated. A similar pattern of performance was found for possible and impossible objects for the short exposure duration, with differences in accuracy between these two types of objects emerging only for longer exposure durations. Overall, these findings provide evidence that the representation of object structure relies on a multi-level process and that object impossibility selectively impairs the rendering of fine-detailed description of object structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4329801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43298012015-03-11 Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects Freud, Erez Hadad, Bat-Sheva Avidan, Galia Ganel, Tzvi Front Psychol Psychology The perceptual processes that mediate the ability to efficiently represent object 3D structure are still not fully understood. The current study was aimed to shed light on these processes by utilizing spatially possible and impossible objects that could not be created in real 3D space. Despite being perceived as exceptionally unusual, impossible objects still possess fundamental Gestalt attributes and valid local depth cues that may support their initial successful representation. Based on this notion and on recent findings from our lab, we hypothesized that the initial representation of impossible objects would involve common mechanisms to those mediating typical object perception while the perceived differences between possible and impossible objects would emerge later along the processing hierarchy. In Experiment 1, participants preformed same/different classifications of two markers superimposed on a display containing two objects (possible or impossible). Faster reaction times were observed for displays in which the markers were superimposed on the same object (“object-based benefit”). Importantly, this benefit was similar for possible and impossible objects, suggesting that the representations of the two object categories rely on similar perceptual organization processes. Yet, responses for impossible objects were slower compared to possible objects. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the origin of this effect. Participants classified the location of two markers while exposure duration was manipulated. A similar pattern of performance was found for possible and impossible objects for the short exposure duration, with differences in accuracy between these two types of objects emerging only for longer exposure durations. Overall, these findings provide evidence that the representation of object structure relies on a multi-level process and that object impossibility selectively impairs the rendering of fine-detailed description of object structure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4329801/ /pubmed/25762949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00094 Text en Copyright © 2015 Freud, Hadad, Avidan and Ganel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Freud, Erez
Hadad, Bat-Sheva
Avidan, Galia
Ganel, Tzvi
Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
title Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
title_full Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
title_fullStr Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
title_short Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
title_sort evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00094
work_keys_str_mv AT freuderez evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects
AT hadadbatsheva evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects
AT avidangalia evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects
AT ganeltzvi evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects