Cargando…
Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects
The perceptual processes that mediate the ability to efficiently represent object 3D structure are still not fully understood. The current study was aimed to shed light on these processes by utilizing spatially possible and impossible objects that could not be created in real 3D space. Despite being...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00094 |
_version_ | 1782357494065004544 |
---|---|
author | Freud, Erez Hadad, Bat-Sheva Avidan, Galia Ganel, Tzvi |
author_facet | Freud, Erez Hadad, Bat-Sheva Avidan, Galia Ganel, Tzvi |
author_sort | Freud, Erez |
collection | PubMed |
description | The perceptual processes that mediate the ability to efficiently represent object 3D structure are still not fully understood. The current study was aimed to shed light on these processes by utilizing spatially possible and impossible objects that could not be created in real 3D space. Despite being perceived as exceptionally unusual, impossible objects still possess fundamental Gestalt attributes and valid local depth cues that may support their initial successful representation. Based on this notion and on recent findings from our lab, we hypothesized that the initial representation of impossible objects would involve common mechanisms to those mediating typical object perception while the perceived differences between possible and impossible objects would emerge later along the processing hierarchy. In Experiment 1, participants preformed same/different classifications of two markers superimposed on a display containing two objects (possible or impossible). Faster reaction times were observed for displays in which the markers were superimposed on the same object (“object-based benefit”). Importantly, this benefit was similar for possible and impossible objects, suggesting that the representations of the two object categories rely on similar perceptual organization processes. Yet, responses for impossible objects were slower compared to possible objects. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the origin of this effect. Participants classified the location of two markers while exposure duration was manipulated. A similar pattern of performance was found for possible and impossible objects for the short exposure duration, with differences in accuracy between these two types of objects emerging only for longer exposure durations. Overall, these findings provide evidence that the representation of object structure relies on a multi-level process and that object impossibility selectively impairs the rendering of fine-detailed description of object structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4329801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43298012015-03-11 Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects Freud, Erez Hadad, Bat-Sheva Avidan, Galia Ganel, Tzvi Front Psychol Psychology The perceptual processes that mediate the ability to efficiently represent object 3D structure are still not fully understood. The current study was aimed to shed light on these processes by utilizing spatially possible and impossible objects that could not be created in real 3D space. Despite being perceived as exceptionally unusual, impossible objects still possess fundamental Gestalt attributes and valid local depth cues that may support their initial successful representation. Based on this notion and on recent findings from our lab, we hypothesized that the initial representation of impossible objects would involve common mechanisms to those mediating typical object perception while the perceived differences between possible and impossible objects would emerge later along the processing hierarchy. In Experiment 1, participants preformed same/different classifications of two markers superimposed on a display containing two objects (possible or impossible). Faster reaction times were observed for displays in which the markers were superimposed on the same object (“object-based benefit”). Importantly, this benefit was similar for possible and impossible objects, suggesting that the representations of the two object categories rely on similar perceptual organization processes. Yet, responses for impossible objects were slower compared to possible objects. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the origin of this effect. Participants classified the location of two markers while exposure duration was manipulated. A similar pattern of performance was found for possible and impossible objects for the short exposure duration, with differences in accuracy between these two types of objects emerging only for longer exposure durations. Overall, these findings provide evidence that the representation of object structure relies on a multi-level process and that object impossibility selectively impairs the rendering of fine-detailed description of object structure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4329801/ /pubmed/25762949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00094 Text en Copyright © 2015 Freud, Hadad, Avidan and Ganel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Freud, Erez Hadad, Bat-Sheva Avidan, Galia Ganel, Tzvi Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects |
title | Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects |
title_full | Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects |
title_fullStr | Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects |
title_short | Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects |
title_sort | evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freuderez evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects AT hadadbatsheva evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects AT avidangalia evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects AT ganeltzvi evidenceforsimilarearlybutnotlaterepresentationofpossibleandimpossibleobjects |