Cargando…

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized noninferiority trial. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the union rate of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is inferior to that of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Jemin, Lee, Gun Woo, Nam, Woo Dong, Han, Kye Young, Kim, Myung-Ho, Kang, Jong Won, Won, Jonghwa, Kim, Seong Wan, Noh, Won, Yeom, Jin S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25705332
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.1.30
_version_ 1782357551972614144
author Yi, Jemin
Lee, Gun Woo
Nam, Woo Dong
Han, Kye Young
Kim, Myung-Ho
Kang, Jong Won
Won, Jonghwa
Kim, Seong Wan
Noh, Won
Yeom, Jin S
author_facet Yi, Jemin
Lee, Gun Woo
Nam, Woo Dong
Han, Kye Young
Kim, Myung-Ho
Kang, Jong Won
Won, Jonghwa
Kim, Seong Wan
Noh, Won
Yeom, Jin S
author_sort Yi, Jemin
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized noninferiority trial. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the union rate of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is inferior to that of a mixture of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and HA. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There have been no clinical trials investigating the outcomes of a mixture of HA and DBM in a PEEK cage in ACDF. METHODS: Eighty-five eligible patients were randomly assigned to group B (n=43), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and DBM was used, or group C (n=42), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and β-TCP was used. The primary study endpoint was the fusion rate, which was assessed with dynamic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, functional outcome using a neck disability index score, laboratory tests of inflammatory profiles, and the infection rate. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (38 in group B and 39 in group C) were included in the final analysis. One year postoperatively, bone fusion was achieved in 87% of group B patients and 87% of group C patients on dynamic radiographs, and 87% of group B patients and 72% of group C patients on CT scans (p=1.00 and 0.16, respectively). There were also no between-groups differences with respect to the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: A HA/DBM mixture inside a PEEK cage can provide noninferior outcomes compared to a HA/TCP mixture in ACDF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4330216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43302162015-02-22 A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture Yi, Jemin Lee, Gun Woo Nam, Woo Dong Han, Kye Young Kim, Myung-Ho Kang, Jong Won Won, Jonghwa Kim, Seong Wan Noh, Won Yeom, Jin S Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized noninferiority trial. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the union rate of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is inferior to that of a mixture of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and HA. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There have been no clinical trials investigating the outcomes of a mixture of HA and DBM in a PEEK cage in ACDF. METHODS: Eighty-five eligible patients were randomly assigned to group B (n=43), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and DBM was used, or group C (n=42), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and β-TCP was used. The primary study endpoint was the fusion rate, which was assessed with dynamic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, functional outcome using a neck disability index score, laboratory tests of inflammatory profiles, and the infection rate. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (38 in group B and 39 in group C) were included in the final analysis. One year postoperatively, bone fusion was achieved in 87% of group B patients and 87% of group C patients on dynamic radiographs, and 87% of group B patients and 72% of group C patients on CT scans (p=1.00 and 0.16, respectively). There were also no between-groups differences with respect to the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: A HA/DBM mixture inside a PEEK cage can provide noninferior outcomes compared to a HA/TCP mixture in ACDF. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2015-02 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4330216/ /pubmed/25705332 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.1.30 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Yi, Jemin
Lee, Gun Woo
Nam, Woo Dong
Han, Kye Young
Kim, Myung-Ho
Kang, Jong Won
Won, Jonghwa
Kim, Seong Wan
Noh, Won
Yeom, Jin S
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture
title A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture
title_full A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture
title_fullStr A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture
title_short A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture
title_sort prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bone union rate following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a polyetheretherketone cage: hydroxyapatite/b-tricalcium phosphate mixture versus hydroxyapatite/demineralized bone matrix mixture
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25705332
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.1.30
work_keys_str_mv AT yijemin aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT leegunwoo aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT namwoodong aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT hankyeyoung aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT kimmyungho aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT kangjongwon aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT wonjonghwa aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT kimseongwan aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT nohwon aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT yeomjins aprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT yijemin prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT leegunwoo prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT namwoodong prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT hankyeyoung prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT kimmyungho prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT kangjongwon prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT wonjonghwa prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT kimseongwan prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT nohwon prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture
AT yeomjins prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingboneunionratefollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionusingapolyetheretherketonecagehydroxyapatitebtricalciumphosphatemixtureversushydroxyapatitedemineralizedbonematrixmixture