Cargando…
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review
OBJECTIVES: To present the most important characteristics of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours (IMTs) arising in different locations of the body with histological correlation. METHODS: To review the symptoms and main radiological findings of IMTs. On ultrasonography (US), these tumours can appear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0370-0 |
_version_ | 1782357557306720256 |
---|---|
author | Cantera, Jon Etxano Alfaro, María Páramo Rafart, David Cano Zalazar, Romina Muruzabal, Maite Millor Barquín, Paula García Pérez, Isabel Vivas |
author_facet | Cantera, Jon Etxano Alfaro, María Páramo Rafart, David Cano Zalazar, Romina Muruzabal, Maite Millor Barquín, Paula García Pérez, Isabel Vivas |
author_sort | Cantera, Jon Etxano |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To present the most important characteristics of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours (IMTs) arising in different locations of the body with histological correlation. METHODS: To review the symptoms and main radiological findings of IMTs. On ultrasonography (US), these tumours can appear as hypoechoic or hyperechoic masses and a variable Doppler appearance with increased vascularity. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) are the most used imaging tools in their evaluation. On contrast-enhanced CT, IMTs can appear as homogeneous or heterogeneous lesions, with variable enhancement on delayed acquisitions due to fibrosis. These findings are also present on gadolinium contrast-enhanced MR. On T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences, IMTs usually show low signal intensity reflecting also the presence of fibrotic tissue. RESULTS: To show the main clinical symptoms and radiological features of IMTs in different locations: head and neck, lung, genitourinary, hepatic, splenic, gastrointestinal tract, mesenteric, muskuloskeletal. CONCLUSIONS: Although IMTs in some organs are not uncommon, they are not usually included in the differential diagnosis of masses. Their radiological features suggest malignant neoplasms, whereas they are not. Consequently, this is an underdiagnosed entity and only after an histological exam could a definitive diagnosis be achieved. TEACHING POINTS: • Their radiological features suggest malignant neoplasms, whereas they are not • CT and MR imaging are the most used tools in their evaluation • IMT is an underdiagnosed entity • The definitive diagnosis is only after histological exam |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4330239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43302392015-02-19 Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review Cantera, Jon Etxano Alfaro, María Páramo Rafart, David Cano Zalazar, Romina Muruzabal, Maite Millor Barquín, Paula García Pérez, Isabel Vivas Insights Imaging Pictorial Review OBJECTIVES: To present the most important characteristics of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours (IMTs) arising in different locations of the body with histological correlation. METHODS: To review the symptoms and main radiological findings of IMTs. On ultrasonography (US), these tumours can appear as hypoechoic or hyperechoic masses and a variable Doppler appearance with increased vascularity. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) are the most used imaging tools in their evaluation. On contrast-enhanced CT, IMTs can appear as homogeneous or heterogeneous lesions, with variable enhancement on delayed acquisitions due to fibrosis. These findings are also present on gadolinium contrast-enhanced MR. On T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences, IMTs usually show low signal intensity reflecting also the presence of fibrotic tissue. RESULTS: To show the main clinical symptoms and radiological features of IMTs in different locations: head and neck, lung, genitourinary, hepatic, splenic, gastrointestinal tract, mesenteric, muskuloskeletal. CONCLUSIONS: Although IMTs in some organs are not uncommon, they are not usually included in the differential diagnosis of masses. Their radiological features suggest malignant neoplasms, whereas they are not. Consequently, this is an underdiagnosed entity and only after an histological exam could a definitive diagnosis be achieved. TEACHING POINTS: • Their radiological features suggest malignant neoplasms, whereas they are not • CT and MR imaging are the most used tools in their evaluation • IMT is an underdiagnosed entity • The definitive diagnosis is only after histological exam Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4330239/ /pubmed/25519466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0370-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Pictorial Review Cantera, Jon Etxano Alfaro, María Páramo Rafart, David Cano Zalazar, Romina Muruzabal, Maite Millor Barquín, Paula García Pérez, Isabel Vivas Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review |
title | Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review |
title_full | Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review |
title_fullStr | Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review |
title_full_unstemmed | Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review |
title_short | Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review |
title_sort | inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: a pictorial review |
topic | Pictorial Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0370-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT canterajonetxano inflammatorymyofibroblastictumoursapictorialreview AT alfaromariaparamo inflammatorymyofibroblastictumoursapictorialreview AT rafartdavidcano inflammatorymyofibroblastictumoursapictorialreview AT zalazarromina inflammatorymyofibroblastictumoursapictorialreview AT muruzabalmaitemillor inflammatorymyofibroblastictumoursapictorialreview AT barquinpaulagarcia inflammatorymyofibroblastictumoursapictorialreview AT perezisabelvivas inflammatorymyofibroblastictumoursapictorialreview |