Cargando…

Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study

Graduated compression stockings carry a potential risk of pressure, vascular and other complications. Current understanding of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk leaves it uncertain whether patients with hip fracture should wear stockings on both legs. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Protty, Majd B, Aithal, Shridhar, Hickey, Ben, Pettit, Rebecca, Johansen, Antony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006956
_version_ 1782357564988588032
author Protty, Majd B
Aithal, Shridhar
Hickey, Ben
Pettit, Rebecca
Johansen, Antony
author_facet Protty, Majd B
Aithal, Shridhar
Hickey, Ben
Pettit, Rebecca
Johansen, Antony
author_sort Protty, Majd B
collection PubMed
description Graduated compression stockings carry a potential risk of pressure, vascular and other complications. Current understanding of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk leaves it uncertain whether patients with hip fracture should wear stockings on both legs. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the side of the hip fracture and the subsequent occurrence of symptomatic lower limb DVT. SETTING: Single tertiary trauma centre, Wales. PARTICIPANTS: All 3657 patients presenting with hip fracture between 2007 and 2013 were identified from our unit's National Hip Fracture Database. We excluded 404 patients (11.0%) resident outside our catchment area, leaving a total of 3253. Median age was 83 years (±12.4). PRIMARY/SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We cross-linked patient details with Medical Physics records, to identify 634 (19.5%) who had undergone one or more lower-limb Doppler-ultrasound scans at some point during the study period. The distribution rates of DVT were calculated from this resulting data set. RESULTS: Many of the total 634 scans were unrelated to the hip fracture, including 225 (35.5%) performed prior to the fracture. We calculated a baseline rate of DVT of 3.7/1000 patients per year, for the 3-month period immediately before the hip fracture. Scans performed following hip fracture showed DVT risk to be highest in the 3-month period after fracture (35.7/1000 patients per year). This resulted from a six-fold increase in DVTs on the side of the fracture (29.5/1000 patients per year, p<0.01). We found only a very small non-significant increase in DVT on the contralateral leg (6.1/1000 patients per year) CONCLUSIONS: The additional risk of DVT after hip fracture is essentially confined to the fractured limb—the leg to which it is most painful to apply stockings. There appears little justification for the cost and potential risk of using stockings on the contralateral leg.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4330328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43303282015-02-24 Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study Protty, Majd B Aithal, Shridhar Hickey, Ben Pettit, Rebecca Johansen, Antony BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine Graduated compression stockings carry a potential risk of pressure, vascular and other complications. Current understanding of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk leaves it uncertain whether patients with hip fracture should wear stockings on both legs. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the side of the hip fracture and the subsequent occurrence of symptomatic lower limb DVT. SETTING: Single tertiary trauma centre, Wales. PARTICIPANTS: All 3657 patients presenting with hip fracture between 2007 and 2013 were identified from our unit's National Hip Fracture Database. We excluded 404 patients (11.0%) resident outside our catchment area, leaving a total of 3253. Median age was 83 years (±12.4). PRIMARY/SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We cross-linked patient details with Medical Physics records, to identify 634 (19.5%) who had undergone one or more lower-limb Doppler-ultrasound scans at some point during the study period. The distribution rates of DVT were calculated from this resulting data set. RESULTS: Many of the total 634 scans were unrelated to the hip fracture, including 225 (35.5%) performed prior to the fracture. We calculated a baseline rate of DVT of 3.7/1000 patients per year, for the 3-month period immediately before the hip fracture. Scans performed following hip fracture showed DVT risk to be highest in the 3-month period after fracture (35.7/1000 patients per year). This resulted from a six-fold increase in DVTs on the side of the fracture (29.5/1000 patients per year, p<0.01). We found only a very small non-significant increase in DVT on the contralateral leg (6.1/1000 patients per year) CONCLUSIONS: The additional risk of DVT after hip fracture is essentially confined to the fractured limb—the leg to which it is most painful to apply stockings. There appears little justification for the cost and potential risk of using stockings on the contralateral leg. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4330328/ /pubmed/25678543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006956 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Protty, Majd B
Aithal, Shridhar
Hickey, Ben
Pettit, Rebecca
Johansen, Antony
Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study
title Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study
title_full Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study
title_short Mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A retrospective observational study
title_sort mechanical prophylaxis after hip fracture: what is the risk of deep vein thrombosis? a retrospective observational study
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006956
work_keys_str_mv AT prottymajdb mechanicalprophylaxisafterhipfracturewhatistheriskofdeepveinthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT aithalshridhar mechanicalprophylaxisafterhipfracturewhatistheriskofdeepveinthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hickeyben mechanicalprophylaxisafterhipfracturewhatistheriskofdeepveinthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pettitrebecca mechanicalprophylaxisafterhipfracturewhatistheriskofdeepveinthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT johansenantony mechanicalprophylaxisafterhipfracturewhatistheriskofdeepveinthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalstudy