Cargando…
Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing
Prediction plays a key role in control of attention but it is not clear which aspects of prediction are most prominent in conscious experience. An evolving view on the brain is that it can be seen as a prediction machine that optimizes its ability to predict states of the world and the self through...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01443 |
_version_ | 1782357638407782400 |
---|---|
author | Mathews, Zenon Cetnarski, Ryszard Verschure, Paul F. M. J. |
author_facet | Mathews, Zenon Cetnarski, Ryszard Verschure, Paul F. M. J. |
author_sort | Mathews, Zenon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prediction plays a key role in control of attention but it is not clear which aspects of prediction are most prominent in conscious experience. An evolving view on the brain is that it can be seen as a prediction machine that optimizes its ability to predict states of the world and the self through the top-down propagation of predictions and the bottom-up presentation of prediction errors. There are competing views though on whether prediction or prediction errors dominate the formation of conscious experience. Yet, the dynamic effects of prediction on perception, decision making and consciousness have been difficult to assess and to model. We propose a novel mathematical framework and a psychophysical paradigm that allows us to assess both the hierarchical structuring of perceptual consciousness, its content and the impact of predictions and/or errors on conscious experience, attention and decision-making. Using a displacement detection task combined with reverse correlation, we reveal signatures of the usage of prediction at three different levels of perceptual processing: bottom-up fast saccades, top-down driven slow saccades and consciousnes decisions. Our results suggest that the brain employs multiple parallel mechanism at different levels of perceptual processing in order to shape effective sensory consciousness within a predicted perceptual scene. We further observe that bottom-up sensory and top-down predictive processes can be dissociated through cognitive load. We propose a probabilistic data association model from dynamical systems theory to model the predictive multi-scale bias in perceptual processing that we observe and its role in the formation of conscious experience. We propose that these results support the hypothesis that consciousness provides a time-delayed description of a task that is used to prospectively optimize real time control structures, rather than being engaged in the real-time control of behavior itself. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4330879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43308792015-03-04 Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing Mathews, Zenon Cetnarski, Ryszard Verschure, Paul F. M. J. Front Psychol Psychology Prediction plays a key role in control of attention but it is not clear which aspects of prediction are most prominent in conscious experience. An evolving view on the brain is that it can be seen as a prediction machine that optimizes its ability to predict states of the world and the self through the top-down propagation of predictions and the bottom-up presentation of prediction errors. There are competing views though on whether prediction or prediction errors dominate the formation of conscious experience. Yet, the dynamic effects of prediction on perception, decision making and consciousness have been difficult to assess and to model. We propose a novel mathematical framework and a psychophysical paradigm that allows us to assess both the hierarchical structuring of perceptual consciousness, its content and the impact of predictions and/or errors on conscious experience, attention and decision-making. Using a displacement detection task combined with reverse correlation, we reveal signatures of the usage of prediction at three different levels of perceptual processing: bottom-up fast saccades, top-down driven slow saccades and consciousnes decisions. Our results suggest that the brain employs multiple parallel mechanism at different levels of perceptual processing in order to shape effective sensory consciousness within a predicted perceptual scene. We further observe that bottom-up sensory and top-down predictive processes can be dissociated through cognitive load. We propose a probabilistic data association model from dynamical systems theory to model the predictive multi-scale bias in perceptual processing that we observe and its role in the formation of conscious experience. We propose that these results support the hypothesis that consciousness provides a time-delayed description of a task that is used to prospectively optimize real time control structures, rather than being engaged in the real-time control of behavior itself. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4330879/ /pubmed/25741290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01443 Text en Copyright © 2015 Mathews, Cetnarski and Verschure. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Mathews, Zenon Cetnarski, Ryszard Verschure, Paul F. M. J. Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing |
title | Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing |
title_full | Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing |
title_fullStr | Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing |
title_short | Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing |
title_sort | visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathewszenon visualanticipationbiasesconsciousdecisionmakingbutnotbottomupvisualprocessing AT cetnarskiryszard visualanticipationbiasesconsciousdecisionmakingbutnotbottomupvisualprocessing AT verschurepaulfmj visualanticipationbiasesconsciousdecisionmakingbutnotbottomupvisualprocessing |