Cargando…

Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review

The Allostatic Load Index (ALI) has been used to establish associations between stress and health-related outcomes. This review summarizes the measurement and methodological challenges of allostatic load in occupational settings. Databases of Medline, PubPsych, and Cochrane were searched to systemat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MAUSS, Daniel, LI, Jian, SCHMIDT, Burkhard, ANGERER, Peter, JARCZOK, Marc N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25224337
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0122
_version_ 1782357678178172928
author MAUSS, Daniel
LI, Jian
SCHMIDT, Burkhard
ANGERER, Peter
JARCZOK, Marc N.
author_facet MAUSS, Daniel
LI, Jian
SCHMIDT, Burkhard
ANGERER, Peter
JARCZOK, Marc N.
author_sort MAUSS, Daniel
collection PubMed
description The Allostatic Load Index (ALI) has been used to establish associations between stress and health-related outcomes. This review summarizes the measurement and methodological challenges of allostatic load in occupational settings. Databases of Medline, PubPsych, and Cochrane were searched to systematically explore studies measuring ALI in working adults following the PRISMA statement. Study characteristics, biomarkers and methods were tabulated. Methodological quality was evaluated using a standardized checklist. Sixteen articles (2003–2013) met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 39 (range 6–17) different variables used to calculate ALI. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the number and type of biomarkers used, the analytic techniques applied and study quality. Particularly, primary mediators were not regularly included in ALI calculation. Consensus on methods to measure ALI in working populations is limited. Research should include longitudinal studies using multi-systemic variables to measure employees at risk for biological wear and tear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4331190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43311902015-02-19 Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review MAUSS, Daniel LI, Jian SCHMIDT, Burkhard ANGERER, Peter JARCZOK, Marc N. Ind Health Review Article The Allostatic Load Index (ALI) has been used to establish associations between stress and health-related outcomes. This review summarizes the measurement and methodological challenges of allostatic load in occupational settings. Databases of Medline, PubPsych, and Cochrane were searched to systematically explore studies measuring ALI in working adults following the PRISMA statement. Study characteristics, biomarkers and methods were tabulated. Methodological quality was evaluated using a standardized checklist. Sixteen articles (2003–2013) met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 39 (range 6–17) different variables used to calculate ALI. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the number and type of biomarkers used, the analytic techniques applied and study quality. Particularly, primary mediators were not regularly included in ALI calculation. Consensus on methods to measure ALI in working populations is limited. Research should include longitudinal studies using multi-systemic variables to measure employees at risk for biological wear and tear. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2014-09-13 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4331190/ /pubmed/25224337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0122 Text en ©2015 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Review Article
MAUSS, Daniel
LI, Jian
SCHMIDT, Burkhard
ANGERER, Peter
JARCZOK, Marc N.
Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
title Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
title_full Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
title_fullStr Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
title_short Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
title_sort measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25224337
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0122
work_keys_str_mv AT maussdaniel measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview
AT lijian measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview
AT schmidtburkhard measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview
AT angererpeter measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview
AT jarczokmarcn measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview