Cargando…
Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review
The Allostatic Load Index (ALI) has been used to establish associations between stress and health-related outcomes. This review summarizes the measurement and methodological challenges of allostatic load in occupational settings. Databases of Medline, PubPsych, and Cochrane were searched to systemat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25224337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0122 |
_version_ | 1782357678178172928 |
---|---|
author | MAUSS, Daniel LI, Jian SCHMIDT, Burkhard ANGERER, Peter JARCZOK, Marc N. |
author_facet | MAUSS, Daniel LI, Jian SCHMIDT, Burkhard ANGERER, Peter JARCZOK, Marc N. |
author_sort | MAUSS, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Allostatic Load Index (ALI) has been used to establish associations between stress and health-related outcomes. This review summarizes the measurement and methodological challenges of allostatic load in occupational settings. Databases of Medline, PubPsych, and Cochrane were searched to systematically explore studies measuring ALI in working adults following the PRISMA statement. Study characteristics, biomarkers and methods were tabulated. Methodological quality was evaluated using a standardized checklist. Sixteen articles (2003–2013) met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 39 (range 6–17) different variables used to calculate ALI. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the number and type of biomarkers used, the analytic techniques applied and study quality. Particularly, primary mediators were not regularly included in ALI calculation. Consensus on methods to measure ALI in working populations is limited. Research should include longitudinal studies using multi-systemic variables to measure employees at risk for biological wear and tear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4331190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43311902015-02-19 Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review MAUSS, Daniel LI, Jian SCHMIDT, Burkhard ANGERER, Peter JARCZOK, Marc N. Ind Health Review Article The Allostatic Load Index (ALI) has been used to establish associations between stress and health-related outcomes. This review summarizes the measurement and methodological challenges of allostatic load in occupational settings. Databases of Medline, PubPsych, and Cochrane were searched to systematically explore studies measuring ALI in working adults following the PRISMA statement. Study characteristics, biomarkers and methods were tabulated. Methodological quality was evaluated using a standardized checklist. Sixteen articles (2003–2013) met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 39 (range 6–17) different variables used to calculate ALI. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the number and type of biomarkers used, the analytic techniques applied and study quality. Particularly, primary mediators were not regularly included in ALI calculation. Consensus on methods to measure ALI in working populations is limited. Research should include longitudinal studies using multi-systemic variables to measure employees at risk for biological wear and tear. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2014-09-13 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4331190/ /pubmed/25224337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0122 Text en ©2015 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Review Article MAUSS, Daniel LI, Jian SCHMIDT, Burkhard ANGERER, Peter JARCZOK, Marc N. Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic review |
title | Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic
review |
title_full | Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic
review |
title_fullStr | Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic
review |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic
review |
title_short | Measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic
review |
title_sort | measuring allostatic load in the workforce: a systematic
review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25224337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maussdaniel measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview AT lijian measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview AT schmidtburkhard measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview AT angererpeter measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview AT jarczokmarcn measuringallostaticloadintheworkforceasystematicreview |