Cargando…

Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?

While avoiding hypoxemia has long been a goal of critical care practitioners, less attention has been paid to the potential for excessive oxygenation. Interest has mounted recently in understanding the clinical effects of hyperoxemia during critical illness, in particular its impact following cardia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gershengorn, Hayley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25673212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0556-3
_version_ 1782357709286277120
author Gershengorn, Hayley
author_facet Gershengorn, Hayley
author_sort Gershengorn, Hayley
collection PubMed
description While avoiding hypoxemia has long been a goal of critical care practitioners, less attention has been paid to the potential for excessive oxygenation. Interest has mounted recently in understanding the clinical effects of hyperoxemia during critical illness, in particular its impact following cardiac arrest. In this issue of Critical Care, Dell’Anna and colleagues review available animal and human data evaluating the impact of hyperoxemia after cardiac arrest. They conclude that while hyperoxemia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is probably desirable, it should probably be avoided during post-resuscitation care. These conclusions are in line with two broader themes in contemporary critical care: that less may be more; and that it is time to look beyond simply preventing short-term mortality towards longer-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4331412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43314122015-02-19 Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing? Gershengorn, Hayley Crit Care Commentary While avoiding hypoxemia has long been a goal of critical care practitioners, less attention has been paid to the potential for excessive oxygenation. Interest has mounted recently in understanding the clinical effects of hyperoxemia during critical illness, in particular its impact following cardiac arrest. In this issue of Critical Care, Dell’Anna and colleagues review available animal and human data evaluating the impact of hyperoxemia after cardiac arrest. They conclude that while hyperoxemia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is probably desirable, it should probably be avoided during post-resuscitation care. These conclusions are in line with two broader themes in contemporary critical care: that less may be more; and that it is time to look beyond simply preventing short-term mortality towards longer-term outcomes. BioMed Central 2014-10-07 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4331412/ /pubmed/25673212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0556-3 Text en © Gershengorn; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 The licensee has exclusive rights to distribute this article, in any medium, for 12 months following its publication. After this time, the article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Gershengorn, Hayley
Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
title Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
title_full Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
title_fullStr Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
title_full_unstemmed Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
title_short Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
title_sort hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25673212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0556-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gershengornhayley hyperoxemiatoomuchofagoodthing