Cargando…

Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket

BACKGROUND: Numerous designs are used to the treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis. For example, a Thoraco-Lumbo-Sacral Orthosis (TLSO) is constructed using Polyethylene (PE). In addition, a series of castings has been implemented using cast material (3M, BSN Medical). The cast material has some signif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizza, Robert, Liu, XueCheng, Thometz, John, Tassone, Channing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S15
_version_ 1782357770285088768
author Rizza, Robert
Liu, XueCheng
Thometz, John
Tassone, Channing
author_facet Rizza, Robert
Liu, XueCheng
Thometz, John
Tassone, Channing
author_sort Rizza, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous designs are used to the treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis. For example, a Thoraco-Lumbo-Sacral Orthosis (TLSO) is constructed using Polyethylene (PE). In addition, a series of castings has been implemented using cast material (3M, BSN Medical). The cast material has some significant advantages over the PE design including: growth preserving, improved compliance, decreased invasiveness, delaying or avoiding surgery, and the ability to allow the skin to breathe. However, the mechanical effectiveness of the cast material brace as compared to the TLSO is unknown, thus providing the objective of this study. METHODS: A total of 23 standardized tensile tests were performed on the Delta-Cast Soft(®) and 3M(TM) Scotchcast(TM) Plus Casting Tape in order to obtain mechanical properties (Young’s and shear moduli and Poisson ratios). Using a radiograph of a thoracic spine, the size of twelve vertebrae and eleven intervertebral discs were measured and used to create a finite element spine model. Simulations using this model were used to establish mechanical loads which were then applied to finite element models of the TLSO and cast jacket. The thicknesses and number of material layers was varied in these models. Multiple simulations were performed. RESULTS: It was found that a 6.6.mm thick cast jacket made of Delta-Cast Soft(®) had a maximum deformation of 4.7 mm, a maximum stress of 2.9 MPa and a structural factor of safety of 5.71. On the other hand, a 4 mm thick jacket made of PE had a maximum deformation of 2 mm, a maximum stress of 8.9 MPa and a structural factor of safety of 2.70. The cast jacket was 3.5 times lighter and had a material of cost 1/5 of the PE brace. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, either design will generate the proper constraint forces to maintain spinal correction. But, based on the design parameters (thickness, mechanical properties, structural factor of safety and cost) the brace made of cast material, though slightly thicker has superior structural and cost benefits. Thus, from the biomechanical point of view, the cast brace is more efficient than the PE brace.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4331733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43317332015-03-26 Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket Rizza, Robert Liu, XueCheng Thometz, John Tassone, Channing Scoliosis Research BACKGROUND: Numerous designs are used to the treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis. For example, a Thoraco-Lumbo-Sacral Orthosis (TLSO) is constructed using Polyethylene (PE). In addition, a series of castings has been implemented using cast material (3M, BSN Medical). The cast material has some significant advantages over the PE design including: growth preserving, improved compliance, decreased invasiveness, delaying or avoiding surgery, and the ability to allow the skin to breathe. However, the mechanical effectiveness of the cast material brace as compared to the TLSO is unknown, thus providing the objective of this study. METHODS: A total of 23 standardized tensile tests were performed on the Delta-Cast Soft(®) and 3M(TM) Scotchcast(TM) Plus Casting Tape in order to obtain mechanical properties (Young’s and shear moduli and Poisson ratios). Using a radiograph of a thoracic spine, the size of twelve vertebrae and eleven intervertebral discs were measured and used to create a finite element spine model. Simulations using this model were used to establish mechanical loads which were then applied to finite element models of the TLSO and cast jacket. The thicknesses and number of material layers was varied in these models. Multiple simulations were performed. RESULTS: It was found that a 6.6.mm thick cast jacket made of Delta-Cast Soft(®) had a maximum deformation of 4.7 mm, a maximum stress of 2.9 MPa and a structural factor of safety of 5.71. On the other hand, a 4 mm thick jacket made of PE had a maximum deformation of 2 mm, a maximum stress of 8.9 MPa and a structural factor of safety of 2.70. The cast jacket was 3.5 times lighter and had a material of cost 1/5 of the PE brace. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, either design will generate the proper constraint forces to maintain spinal correction. But, based on the design parameters (thickness, mechanical properties, structural factor of safety and cost) the brace made of cast material, though slightly thicker has superior structural and cost benefits. Thus, from the biomechanical point of view, the cast brace is more efficient than the PE brace. BioMed Central 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4331733/ /pubmed/25815054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S15 Text en Copyright © 2015 Rizza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rizza, Robert
Liu, XueCheng
Thometz, John
Tassone, Channing
Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket
title Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket
title_full Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket
title_fullStr Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket
title_short Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket
title_sort comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S15
work_keys_str_mv AT rizzarobert comparisonofbiomechanicalbehaviorbetweenacastmaterialtorsojacketandapolyethylenebasedjacket
AT liuxuecheng comparisonofbiomechanicalbehaviorbetweenacastmaterialtorsojacketandapolyethylenebasedjacket
AT thometzjohn comparisonofbiomechanicalbehaviorbetweenacastmaterialtorsojacketandapolyethylenebasedjacket
AT tassonechanning comparisonofbiomechanicalbehaviorbetweenacastmaterialtorsojacketandapolyethylenebasedjacket