Cargando…

Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group

BACKGROUND: The Rib Index, (RI), extracted from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) on lateral spinal radiographs to evaluate rib hump deformity, (RHD), in idiopathic scoliosis, (IS), patients, has been previously introduced. Although various papers using the RI have been published, no study on its r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soultanis, Konstantinos C, Tsiavos, Konstantinos, Grivas, Theodoros B, Stavropoulos, Nikolaos A, Sakellariou, Vasileios I, Mavrogenis, Andreas F, Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S9
_version_ 1782357777058889728
author Soultanis, Konstantinos C
Tsiavos, Konstantinos
Grivas, Theodoros B
Stavropoulos, Nikolaos A
Sakellariou, Vasileios I
Mavrogenis, Andreas F
Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J
author_facet Soultanis, Konstantinos C
Tsiavos, Konstantinos
Grivas, Theodoros B
Stavropoulos, Nikolaos A
Sakellariou, Vasileios I
Mavrogenis, Andreas F
Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J
author_sort Soultanis, Konstantinos C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Rib Index, (RI), extracted from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) on lateral spinal radiographs to evaluate rib hump deformity, (RHD), in idiopathic scoliosis, (IS), patients, has been previously introduced. Although various papers using the RI have been published, no study on its reproducibility has been reported. The aim of this report is to estimate the variations of the RI in a number of a pair set of lateral chest radiographs (LCRs). The hypothesis was that the RI should have minimal variability for each subject having successive LCRs. METHODS: Seventy randomized patients who were treated in the hospital for lung diseases (mainly pneumonia or other communicable lung diseases), were initially included in the study. Each of these patients had two successive LCRs (named A and B group of radiographs) at the radiological department of the hospital, by the same technician, during the course of their treatment. The radiation source - patient distance was constant. LCRs obtained at an incorrect patient’s position, or from patients who underwent a thoracic intervention and all LCRs with symmetric hemi-thoraces were excluded from the study. The LCRs of 49 patients were deemed suitable for inclusion in the study. The RI was calculated in both (A and B) LCRs of each patient. The statistical analysis included the following techniques: paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient and intra- and inter-observer error using the formula (SD/√2)/2, where SD is this of the differences of the two sets of measurement (As-Bs). The SPSS v16 statistical package was used. RESULTS: In the 49 pairs of LCRs there was no statistical difference of the RI, (paired t-test p< 0.314). The RI in the A and B group of LCRs was perfectly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0,924, p < 0.0001). The intra-observer error was 0.0080 while the inter-observer error 0.0213 in terms of 95% CI. CONCLUSION: The RI proves to be a reliable method to evaluate the thoracic deformity and the effect of surgical or non-operative treatment on the IS RHD. RI is a simple method, a safe reproducible way to assess the RHD based on lateral radiographs, without the need for any further special radiographs and exposure to additional radiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4331769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43317692015-03-26 Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group Soultanis, Konstantinos C Tsiavos, Konstantinos Grivas, Theodoros B Stavropoulos, Nikolaos A Sakellariou, Vasileios I Mavrogenis, Andreas F Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J Scoliosis Research BACKGROUND: The Rib Index, (RI), extracted from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) on lateral spinal radiographs to evaluate rib hump deformity, (RHD), in idiopathic scoliosis, (IS), patients, has been previously introduced. Although various papers using the RI have been published, no study on its reproducibility has been reported. The aim of this report is to estimate the variations of the RI in a number of a pair set of lateral chest radiographs (LCRs). The hypothesis was that the RI should have minimal variability for each subject having successive LCRs. METHODS: Seventy randomized patients who were treated in the hospital for lung diseases (mainly pneumonia or other communicable lung diseases), were initially included in the study. Each of these patients had two successive LCRs (named A and B group of radiographs) at the radiological department of the hospital, by the same technician, during the course of their treatment. The radiation source - patient distance was constant. LCRs obtained at an incorrect patient’s position, or from patients who underwent a thoracic intervention and all LCRs with symmetric hemi-thoraces were excluded from the study. The LCRs of 49 patients were deemed suitable for inclusion in the study. The RI was calculated in both (A and B) LCRs of each patient. The statistical analysis included the following techniques: paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient and intra- and inter-observer error using the formula (SD/√2)/2, where SD is this of the differences of the two sets of measurement (As-Bs). The SPSS v16 statistical package was used. RESULTS: In the 49 pairs of LCRs there was no statistical difference of the RI, (paired t-test p< 0.314). The RI in the A and B group of LCRs was perfectly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0,924, p < 0.0001). The intra-observer error was 0.0080 while the inter-observer error 0.0213 in terms of 95% CI. CONCLUSION: The RI proves to be a reliable method to evaluate the thoracic deformity and the effect of surgical or non-operative treatment on the IS RHD. RI is a simple method, a safe reproducible way to assess the RHD based on lateral radiographs, without the need for any further special radiographs and exposure to additional radiation. BioMed Central 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4331769/ /pubmed/25815058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S9 Text en Copyright © 2015 Soultanis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Soultanis, Konstantinos C
Tsiavos, Konstantinos
Grivas, Theodoros B
Stavropoulos, Nikolaos A
Sakellariou, Vasileios I
Mavrogenis, Andreas F
Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J
Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group
title Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group
title_full Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group
title_fullStr Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group
title_full_unstemmed Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group
title_short Reliability study for the Rib Index in chest radiographs of a control group
title_sort reliability study for the rib index in chest radiographs of a control group
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S9
work_keys_str_mv AT soultaniskonstantinosc reliabilitystudyfortheribindexinchestradiographsofacontrolgroup
AT tsiavoskonstantinos reliabilitystudyfortheribindexinchestradiographsofacontrolgroup
AT grivastheodorosb reliabilitystudyfortheribindexinchestradiographsofacontrolgroup
AT stavropoulosnikolaosa reliabilitystudyfortheribindexinchestradiographsofacontrolgroup
AT sakellariouvasileiosi reliabilitystudyfortheribindexinchestradiographsofacontrolgroup
AT mavrogenisandreasf reliabilitystudyfortheribindexinchestradiographsofacontrolgroup
AT papagelopoulospanayiotisj reliabilitystudyfortheribindexinchestradiographsofacontrolgroup