Cargando…
Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients
OBJECTIVE: In a regional hospital, many patients are newly diagnosed with cancer. Breaking the bad news in these patients and their relatives is a tough task. Many doctors are not experienced in talking to patients about death or death-related diseases. In recent years, there have been great efforts...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.150172 |
_version_ | 1782357849649709056 |
---|---|
author | Konstantis, Apostolos Exiara, Triada |
author_facet | Konstantis, Apostolos Exiara, Triada |
author_sort | Konstantis, Apostolos |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In a regional hospital, many patients are newly diagnosed with cancer. Breaking the bad news in these patients and their relatives is a tough task. Many doctors are not experienced in talking to patients about death or death-related diseases. In recent years, there have been great efforts to change the current situation. The aim of this study was to investigate the experience and education of medical personnel in breaking bad news in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 59 doctors from General Hospital of Komotini, Greece were included in the study. All the doctors were in clinical specialties that treated cancer patients. A brief questionnaire was developed based on current guidelines such as Baile/SPIKES framework and the ABCDE mnemonic. RESULTS: Residents are involved in delivering bad news less frequently than specialists. Only 21 doctors (35.59%) had specific training on breaking bad news. 20 doctors (33.90%) were aware of the available techniques and protocols on breaking bad news. 47 doctors (79.66%) had a consistent plan for breaking bad news. 57 (96.61%) delivered bad news in a quiet place, 53 (89.83%) ensured no interruptions and enough time, 53 (89.83%) used simple words and 54 (91.53%) checked for understanding and did not rush through the news. 46 doctors (77.97%) allowed relatives to determine patient's knowledge about the disease. CONCLUSIONS: There were low rates of specific training in breaking bad news. However, the selected location, the physician's speech and their plan were according to current guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4332125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43321252015-02-23 Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients Konstantis, Apostolos Exiara, Triada Indian J Palliat Care Original Article OBJECTIVE: In a regional hospital, many patients are newly diagnosed with cancer. Breaking the bad news in these patients and their relatives is a tough task. Many doctors are not experienced in talking to patients about death or death-related diseases. In recent years, there have been great efforts to change the current situation. The aim of this study was to investigate the experience and education of medical personnel in breaking bad news in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 59 doctors from General Hospital of Komotini, Greece were included in the study. All the doctors were in clinical specialties that treated cancer patients. A brief questionnaire was developed based on current guidelines such as Baile/SPIKES framework and the ABCDE mnemonic. RESULTS: Residents are involved in delivering bad news less frequently than specialists. Only 21 doctors (35.59%) had specific training on breaking bad news. 20 doctors (33.90%) were aware of the available techniques and protocols on breaking bad news. 47 doctors (79.66%) had a consistent plan for breaking bad news. 57 (96.61%) delivered bad news in a quiet place, 53 (89.83%) ensured no interruptions and enough time, 53 (89.83%) used simple words and 54 (91.53%) checked for understanding and did not rush through the news. 46 doctors (77.97%) allowed relatives to determine patient's knowledge about the disease. CONCLUSIONS: There were low rates of specific training in breaking bad news. However, the selected location, the physician's speech and their plan were according to current guidelines. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4332125/ /pubmed/25709183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.150172 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Palliative Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Konstantis, Apostolos Exiara, Triada Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients |
title | Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients |
title_full | Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients |
title_short | Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients |
title_sort | breaking bad news in cancer patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.150172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konstantisapostolos breakingbadnewsincancerpatients AT exiaratriada breakingbadnewsincancerpatients |