Cargando…

Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles

Adequate training of the trunk muscles is essential to prevent low back pain. Although sit‐ups are simple to perform, the perceived high effort is the reason why training the abdominal muscles is seldom continued over a longer period of time. It is well known that the abdominal muscles are inferior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Laura, Anders, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501425
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12229
_version_ 1782357869924974592
author Hansen, Laura
Anders, Christoph
author_facet Hansen, Laura
Anders, Christoph
author_sort Hansen, Laura
collection PubMed
description Adequate training of the trunk muscles is essential to prevent low back pain. Although sit‐ups are simple to perform, the perceived high effort is the reason why training the abdominal muscles is seldom continued over a longer period of time. It is well known that the abdominal muscles are inferior to the back muscles in terms of force, but this cannot explain the extreme difference in perceived effort between trunk flexion and extension tasks. Therefore, this study was aimed at the identification of control strategy influences on the muscular stress level. Thirty‐nine subjects were investigated. The performed tasks were restricted to the sagittal plane and were implemented with simulated and realized tilt angles. Subjects were investigated in an upright position with their lower bodies fixed and their upper bodies free. Posture‐controlled tasks involved graded forward and backward tilting, while force‐controlled tasks involved the application of force based on a virtual tilt angle. The Surface EMG (SEMG) was taken from five trunk muscles on both sides. Control strategies seemed to have no systematic influence on the SEMG amplitudes of the back muscles. In contrast, the abdominal muscles exhibited significantly higher stress levels under posture‐controlled conditions without relevantly increasing antagonistic co‐activation of back muscles. The abdominal muscles' relative differences ranged from an average of 20% for the external oblique abdominal muscle to approximately 40% for the rectus abdominal muscle. The perceived high effort expended during sit‐ups can now be explained by the posture‐controlled contractions that are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4332210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43322102015-04-07 Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles Hansen, Laura Anders, Christoph Physiol Rep Original Research Adequate training of the trunk muscles is essential to prevent low back pain. Although sit‐ups are simple to perform, the perceived high effort is the reason why training the abdominal muscles is seldom continued over a longer period of time. It is well known that the abdominal muscles are inferior to the back muscles in terms of force, but this cannot explain the extreme difference in perceived effort between trunk flexion and extension tasks. Therefore, this study was aimed at the identification of control strategy influences on the muscular stress level. Thirty‐nine subjects were investigated. The performed tasks were restricted to the sagittal plane and were implemented with simulated and realized tilt angles. Subjects were investigated in an upright position with their lower bodies fixed and their upper bodies free. Posture‐controlled tasks involved graded forward and backward tilting, while force‐controlled tasks involved the application of force based on a virtual tilt angle. The Surface EMG (SEMG) was taken from five trunk muscles on both sides. Control strategies seemed to have no systematic influence on the SEMG amplitudes of the back muscles. In contrast, the abdominal muscles exhibited significantly higher stress levels under posture‐controlled conditions without relevantly increasing antagonistic co‐activation of back muscles. The abdominal muscles' relative differences ranged from an average of 20% for the external oblique abdominal muscle to approximately 40% for the rectus abdominal muscle. The perceived high effort expended during sit‐ups can now be explained by the posture‐controlled contractions that are required. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4332210/ /pubmed/25501425 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12229 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hansen, Laura
Anders, Christoph
Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles
title Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles
title_full Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles
title_fullStr Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles
title_short Influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles
title_sort influence of different control strategies on muscle activation patterns in trunk muscles
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501425
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12229
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenlaura influenceofdifferentcontrolstrategiesonmuscleactivationpatternsintrunkmuscles
AT anderschristoph influenceofdifferentcontrolstrategiesonmuscleactivationpatternsintrunkmuscles