Cargando…
Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis
INTRODUCTION: Tiotropium is prescribed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and delivered via HandiHaler(®) (18 μg once daily) or Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ inhaler (5 μg once daily). The recent TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat(®) (TIOSPIR™) study demonstrated t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S75146 |
_version_ | 1782357887778029568 |
---|---|
author | Halpin, David MG Dahl, Ronald Hallmann, Christoph Mueller, Achim Tashkin, Donald |
author_facet | Halpin, David MG Dahl, Ronald Hallmann, Christoph Mueller, Achim Tashkin, Donald |
author_sort | Halpin, David MG |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Tiotropium is prescribed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and delivered via HandiHaler(®) (18 μg once daily) or Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ inhaler (5 μg once daily). The recent TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat(®) (TIOSPIR™) study demonstrated that both exhibit similar safety profiles. This analysis provides an updated comprehensive safety evaluation of tiotropium(®) using data from placebo-controlled HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) trials. METHODS: Pooled analysis of adverse event (AE) data from tiotropium HandiHaler(®) 18 μg and Respimat(®) 5 μg randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, clinical trials in patients with COPD (treatment duration ≥4 weeks). Incidence rates, rate ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) trials, both together and separately. RESULTS: In the 28 HandiHaler(®) and 7 Respimat(®) trials included in this analysis, 11,626 patients were treated with placebo and 12,929 with tiotropium, totaling 14,909 (12,469 with HandiHaler(®); 2,440 with Respimat(®)) patient-years of tiotropium exposure. Mean age was 65 years, and mean prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 1.16 L (41% predicted). The risk (RR [95% CI]) of AEs (0.90 [0.87, 0.93]) and of serious AEs (SAEs) (0.94 [0.89, 0.99]) was significantly lower in the tiotropium than in the placebo group (HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) pooled results), and there was a numerically lower risk of fatal AEs (FAEs) (0.90 [0.79, 1.01]). The risk of cardiac AEs (0.93 [0.85, 1.02]) was numerically lower in the tiotropium group. Incidences of typical anticholinergic AEs, but not SAEs, were higher with tiotropium. Analyzed separately by inhaler, the risks of AE and SAE in the tiotropium groups remained lower than in placebo and similarly for FAEs. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that tiotropium is associated with lower rates of AEs, SAEs, and similar rates of FAEs than placebo when delivered via HandiHaler(®) or Respimat(®) (overall and separately) in patients with COPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4332287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43322872015-02-23 Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis Halpin, David MG Dahl, Ronald Hallmann, Christoph Mueller, Achim Tashkin, Donald Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Tiotropium is prescribed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and delivered via HandiHaler(®) (18 μg once daily) or Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ inhaler (5 μg once daily). The recent TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat(®) (TIOSPIR™) study demonstrated that both exhibit similar safety profiles. This analysis provides an updated comprehensive safety evaluation of tiotropium(®) using data from placebo-controlled HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) trials. METHODS: Pooled analysis of adverse event (AE) data from tiotropium HandiHaler(®) 18 μg and Respimat(®) 5 μg randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, clinical trials in patients with COPD (treatment duration ≥4 weeks). Incidence rates, rate ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) trials, both together and separately. RESULTS: In the 28 HandiHaler(®) and 7 Respimat(®) trials included in this analysis, 11,626 patients were treated with placebo and 12,929 with tiotropium, totaling 14,909 (12,469 with HandiHaler(®); 2,440 with Respimat(®)) patient-years of tiotropium exposure. Mean age was 65 years, and mean prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 1.16 L (41% predicted). The risk (RR [95% CI]) of AEs (0.90 [0.87, 0.93]) and of serious AEs (SAEs) (0.94 [0.89, 0.99]) was significantly lower in the tiotropium than in the placebo group (HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) pooled results), and there was a numerically lower risk of fatal AEs (FAEs) (0.90 [0.79, 1.01]). The risk of cardiac AEs (0.93 [0.85, 1.02]) was numerically lower in the tiotropium group. Incidences of typical anticholinergic AEs, but not SAEs, were higher with tiotropium. Analyzed separately by inhaler, the risks of AE and SAE in the tiotropium groups remained lower than in placebo and similarly for FAEs. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that tiotropium is associated with lower rates of AEs, SAEs, and similar rates of FAEs than placebo when delivered via HandiHaler(®) or Respimat(®) (overall and separately) in patients with COPD. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4332287/ /pubmed/25709423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S75146 Text en © 2015 Halpin et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Halpin, David MG Dahl, Ronald Hallmann, Christoph Mueller, Achim Tashkin, Donald Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis |
title | Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis |
title_full | Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis |
title_fullStr | Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis |
title_short | Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis |
title_sort | tiotropium handihaler(®) and respimat(®) in copd: a pooled safety analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S75146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halpindavidmg tiotropiumhandihalerandrespimatincopdapooledsafetyanalysis AT dahlronald tiotropiumhandihalerandrespimatincopdapooledsafetyanalysis AT hallmannchristoph tiotropiumhandihalerandrespimatincopdapooledsafetyanalysis AT muellerachim tiotropiumhandihalerandrespimatincopdapooledsafetyanalysis AT tashkindonald tiotropiumhandihalerandrespimatincopdapooledsafetyanalysis |