Cargando…

TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effect of two commonly used therapeutic modalities (a) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and (b) cold water immersion (CWI) on circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and monocyte TNF-α receptor (TNFR1) expression following inten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Townsend, Jeremy R., Hoffman, Jay R., Fragala, Maren S., Jajtner, Adam R., Gonzalez, Adam M., Wells, Adam J., Mangine, Gerald T., Fukuda, David H., Stout, Jeffrey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741287
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00048
_version_ 1782357890121596928
author Townsend, Jeremy R.
Hoffman, Jay R.
Fragala, Maren S.
Jajtner, Adam R.
Gonzalez, Adam M.
Wells, Adam J.
Mangine, Gerald T.
Fukuda, David H.
Stout, Jeffrey R.
author_facet Townsend, Jeremy R.
Hoffman, Jay R.
Fragala, Maren S.
Jajtner, Adam R.
Gonzalez, Adam M.
Wells, Adam J.
Mangine, Gerald T.
Fukuda, David H.
Stout, Jeffrey R.
author_sort Townsend, Jeremy R.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effect of two commonly used therapeutic modalities (a) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and (b) cold water immersion (CWI) on circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and monocyte TNF-α receptor (TNFR1) expression following intense acute resistance exercise and subsequent recovery. Thirty (n = 30) resistance trained men (22.5 ± 2.7 y) performed an acute heavy resistance exercise protocol on three consecutive days followed by one of three recovery methods (CON, NMES, and CWI). Circulating TNF-α levels were assayed and TNFR1 expression on CD14+ monocytes was measured by flow cytometry measured PRE, immediately post (IP), 30-min post (30M), 24 h post (24H), and 48 h post (48H) exercise. Circulating TNF-α was elevated at IP (p = 0.001) and 30M (p = 0.005) and decreased at 24H and 48H recovery from IP in CON (p = 0.015) and CWI (p = 0.011). TNF-α did not significantly decrease from IP during recovery in NMES. TNFR1 expression was elevated (p < 0.001) at 30M compared to PRE and all other time points. No significant differences between groups were observed in TNFR1 expression. During recovery (24H, 48H) from muscle damaging exercise, NMES treatment appears to prevent the decline in circulating TNF-α observed during recovery in those receiving no treatment or CWI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4332300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43323002015-03-04 TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise Townsend, Jeremy R. Hoffman, Jay R. Fragala, Maren S. Jajtner, Adam R. Gonzalez, Adam M. Wells, Adam J. Mangine, Gerald T. Fukuda, David H. Stout, Jeffrey R. Front Physiol Physiology The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effect of two commonly used therapeutic modalities (a) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and (b) cold water immersion (CWI) on circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and monocyte TNF-α receptor (TNFR1) expression following intense acute resistance exercise and subsequent recovery. Thirty (n = 30) resistance trained men (22.5 ± 2.7 y) performed an acute heavy resistance exercise protocol on three consecutive days followed by one of three recovery methods (CON, NMES, and CWI). Circulating TNF-α levels were assayed and TNFR1 expression on CD14+ monocytes was measured by flow cytometry measured PRE, immediately post (IP), 30-min post (30M), 24 h post (24H), and 48 h post (48H) exercise. Circulating TNF-α was elevated at IP (p = 0.001) and 30M (p = 0.005) and decreased at 24H and 48H recovery from IP in CON (p = 0.015) and CWI (p = 0.011). TNF-α did not significantly decrease from IP during recovery in NMES. TNFR1 expression was elevated (p < 0.001) at 30M compared to PRE and all other time points. No significant differences between groups were observed in TNFR1 expression. During recovery (24H, 48H) from muscle damaging exercise, NMES treatment appears to prevent the decline in circulating TNF-α observed during recovery in those receiving no treatment or CWI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4332300/ /pubmed/25741287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00048 Text en Copyright © 2015 Townsend, Hoffman, Fragala, Jajtner, Gonzalez, Wells, Mangine, Fukuda and Stout. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Townsend, Jeremy R.
Hoffman, Jay R.
Fragala, Maren S.
Jajtner, Adam R.
Gonzalez, Adam M.
Wells, Adam J.
Mangine, Gerald T.
Fukuda, David H.
Stout, Jeffrey R.
TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
title TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
title_full TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
title_fullStr TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
title_full_unstemmed TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
title_short TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
title_sort tnf-α and tnfr1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741287
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00048
work_keys_str_mv AT townsendjeremyr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT hoffmanjayr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT fragalamarens tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT jajtneradamr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT gonzalezadamm tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT wellsadamj tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT manginegeraldt tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT fukudadavidh tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise
AT stoutjeffreyr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise