Cargando…
TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effect of two commonly used therapeutic modalities (a) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and (b) cold water immersion (CWI) on circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and monocyte TNF-α receptor (TNFR1) expression following inten...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00048 |
_version_ | 1782357890121596928 |
---|---|
author | Townsend, Jeremy R. Hoffman, Jay R. Fragala, Maren S. Jajtner, Adam R. Gonzalez, Adam M. Wells, Adam J. Mangine, Gerald T. Fukuda, David H. Stout, Jeffrey R. |
author_facet | Townsend, Jeremy R. Hoffman, Jay R. Fragala, Maren S. Jajtner, Adam R. Gonzalez, Adam M. Wells, Adam J. Mangine, Gerald T. Fukuda, David H. Stout, Jeffrey R. |
author_sort | Townsend, Jeremy R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effect of two commonly used therapeutic modalities (a) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and (b) cold water immersion (CWI) on circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and monocyte TNF-α receptor (TNFR1) expression following intense acute resistance exercise and subsequent recovery. Thirty (n = 30) resistance trained men (22.5 ± 2.7 y) performed an acute heavy resistance exercise protocol on three consecutive days followed by one of three recovery methods (CON, NMES, and CWI). Circulating TNF-α levels were assayed and TNFR1 expression on CD14+ monocytes was measured by flow cytometry measured PRE, immediately post (IP), 30-min post (30M), 24 h post (24H), and 48 h post (48H) exercise. Circulating TNF-α was elevated at IP (p = 0.001) and 30M (p = 0.005) and decreased at 24H and 48H recovery from IP in CON (p = 0.015) and CWI (p = 0.011). TNF-α did not significantly decrease from IP during recovery in NMES. TNFR1 expression was elevated (p < 0.001) at 30M compared to PRE and all other time points. No significant differences between groups were observed in TNFR1 expression. During recovery (24H, 48H) from muscle damaging exercise, NMES treatment appears to prevent the decline in circulating TNF-α observed during recovery in those receiving no treatment or CWI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4332300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43323002015-03-04 TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise Townsend, Jeremy R. Hoffman, Jay R. Fragala, Maren S. Jajtner, Adam R. Gonzalez, Adam M. Wells, Adam J. Mangine, Gerald T. Fukuda, David H. Stout, Jeffrey R. Front Physiol Physiology The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effect of two commonly used therapeutic modalities (a) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and (b) cold water immersion (CWI) on circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and monocyte TNF-α receptor (TNFR1) expression following intense acute resistance exercise and subsequent recovery. Thirty (n = 30) resistance trained men (22.5 ± 2.7 y) performed an acute heavy resistance exercise protocol on three consecutive days followed by one of three recovery methods (CON, NMES, and CWI). Circulating TNF-α levels were assayed and TNFR1 expression on CD14+ monocytes was measured by flow cytometry measured PRE, immediately post (IP), 30-min post (30M), 24 h post (24H), and 48 h post (48H) exercise. Circulating TNF-α was elevated at IP (p = 0.001) and 30M (p = 0.005) and decreased at 24H and 48H recovery from IP in CON (p = 0.015) and CWI (p = 0.011). TNF-α did not significantly decrease from IP during recovery in NMES. TNFR1 expression was elevated (p < 0.001) at 30M compared to PRE and all other time points. No significant differences between groups were observed in TNFR1 expression. During recovery (24H, 48H) from muscle damaging exercise, NMES treatment appears to prevent the decline in circulating TNF-α observed during recovery in those receiving no treatment or CWI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4332300/ /pubmed/25741287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00048 Text en Copyright © 2015 Townsend, Hoffman, Fragala, Jajtner, Gonzalez, Wells, Mangine, Fukuda and Stout. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Townsend, Jeremy R. Hoffman, Jay R. Fragala, Maren S. Jajtner, Adam R. Gonzalez, Adam M. Wells, Adam J. Mangine, Gerald T. Fukuda, David H. Stout, Jeffrey R. TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise |
title | TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise |
title_full | TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise |
title_fullStr | TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise |
title_full_unstemmed | TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise |
title_short | TNF-α and TNFR1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise |
title_sort | tnf-α and tnfr1 responses to recovery therapies following acute resistance exercise |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT townsendjeremyr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT hoffmanjayr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT fragalamarens tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT jajtneradamr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT gonzalezadamm tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT wellsadamj tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT manginegeraldt tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT fukudadavidh tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise AT stoutjeffreyr tnfaandtnfr1responsestorecoverytherapiesfollowingacuteresistanceexercise |