Cargando…

Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences

The human gut contains dense and diverse microbial communities which have profound influences on human health. Gaining meaningful insights into these communities requires provision of high quality microbial nucleic acids from human fecal samples, as well as an understanding of the sources of variati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner Mackenzie, Brett, Waite, David W., Taylor, Michael W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00130
_version_ 1782357905165516800
author Wagner Mackenzie, Brett
Waite, David W.
Taylor, Michael W.
author_facet Wagner Mackenzie, Brett
Waite, David W.
Taylor, Michael W.
author_sort Wagner Mackenzie, Brett
collection PubMed
description The human gut contains dense and diverse microbial communities which have profound influences on human health. Gaining meaningful insights into these communities requires provision of high quality microbial nucleic acids from human fecal samples, as well as an understanding of the sources of variation and their impacts on the experimental model. We present here a systematic analysis of commonly used microbial DNA extraction methods, and identify significant sources of variation. Five extraction methods (Human Microbiome Project protocol, MoBio PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep, phenol:chloroform-based DNA isolation) were evaluated based on the following criteria: DNA yield, quality and integrity, and microbial community structure based on Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V4 region of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes. Our results indicate that the largest portion of variation within the model was attributed to differences between subjects (biological variation), with a smaller proportion of variation associated with DNA extraction method (technical variation) and intra-subject variation. A comprehensive understanding of the potential impact of technical variation on the human gut microbiota will help limit preventable bias, enabling more accurate diversity estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4332372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43323722015-03-04 Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences Wagner Mackenzie, Brett Waite, David W. Taylor, Michael W. Front Microbiol Microbiology The human gut contains dense and diverse microbial communities which have profound influences on human health. Gaining meaningful insights into these communities requires provision of high quality microbial nucleic acids from human fecal samples, as well as an understanding of the sources of variation and their impacts on the experimental model. We present here a systematic analysis of commonly used microbial DNA extraction methods, and identify significant sources of variation. Five extraction methods (Human Microbiome Project protocol, MoBio PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep, phenol:chloroform-based DNA isolation) were evaluated based on the following criteria: DNA yield, quality and integrity, and microbial community structure based on Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V4 region of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes. Our results indicate that the largest portion of variation within the model was attributed to differences between subjects (biological variation), with a smaller proportion of variation associated with DNA extraction method (technical variation) and intra-subject variation. A comprehensive understanding of the potential impact of technical variation on the human gut microbiota will help limit preventable bias, enabling more accurate diversity estimates. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4332372/ /pubmed/25741335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00130 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wagner Mackenzie, Waite and Taylor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Wagner Mackenzie, Brett
Waite, David W.
Taylor, Michael W.
Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences
title Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences
title_full Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences
title_fullStr Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences
title_short Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences
title_sort evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to dna extraction method and inter-subject differences
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00130
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnermackenziebrett evaluatingvariationinhumangutmicrobiotaprofilesduetodnaextractionmethodandintersubjectdifferences
AT waitedavidw evaluatingvariationinhumangutmicrobiotaprofilesduetodnaextractionmethodandintersubjectdifferences
AT taylormichaelw evaluatingvariationinhumangutmicrobiotaprofilesduetodnaextractionmethodandintersubjectdifferences