Cargando…

Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults

PURPOSE: To determine the interocular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness difference of normal subjects. METHODS: Both eyes of 230 normal adults received peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using OCT. The effect of ocular cyclotorsion on the RNFL thickness profile was mathematically cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Seung Woo, Lee, Seung Bum, Jee, Dong-hyun, Ahn, Myung Douk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116313
_version_ 1782357920195805184
author Hong, Seung Woo
Lee, Seung Bum
Jee, Dong-hyun
Ahn, Myung Douk
author_facet Hong, Seung Woo
Lee, Seung Bum
Jee, Dong-hyun
Ahn, Myung Douk
author_sort Hong, Seung Woo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the interocular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness difference of normal subjects. METHODS: Both eyes of 230 normal adults received peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using OCT. The effect of ocular cyclotorsion on the RNFL thickness profile was mathematically corrected. The fractional and absolute interocular RNFL thickness differences at 256 points of peripapillary area were calculated. We divided the subjects into 3 groups according to the locations of superior and inferior peak thickness, respectively, and compared the interocular RNFL thickness differences between the subgroups. RESULTS: The fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference exhibited smaller regional variations than the absolute interocular difference. The means of fractional interocular differences were 0.100 ± 0.077 in the temporal half area and 0.146 ± 0.105 in the nasal half area, and the tolerance limits for the 95th and 99th distributions were about 0.246 and 0.344 in the temporal half area and 0.293 and 0.408 in the nasal half area, respectively. The fractional interocular differences of subgroups classified by the locations of superior and inferior peak RNFL thickness showed difference at smaller areas than the absolute interocular differences (19 and 8 points versus 49 and 23 points, respectively). CONCLUSION: Glaucoma can be strongly suspected, if interocular fractional RNFL thickness difference is over 25% at 5 consecutive points or over 35% at 3 consecutive points in the temporal half area. The fractional interocular comparison is a better diagnostic approach because the fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference is less influenced by the locations of peak RNFL thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4332477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43324772015-02-24 Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults Hong, Seung Woo Lee, Seung Bum Jee, Dong-hyun Ahn, Myung Douk PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To determine the interocular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness difference of normal subjects. METHODS: Both eyes of 230 normal adults received peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using OCT. The effect of ocular cyclotorsion on the RNFL thickness profile was mathematically corrected. The fractional and absolute interocular RNFL thickness differences at 256 points of peripapillary area were calculated. We divided the subjects into 3 groups according to the locations of superior and inferior peak thickness, respectively, and compared the interocular RNFL thickness differences between the subgroups. RESULTS: The fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference exhibited smaller regional variations than the absolute interocular difference. The means of fractional interocular differences were 0.100 ± 0.077 in the temporal half area and 0.146 ± 0.105 in the nasal half area, and the tolerance limits for the 95th and 99th distributions were about 0.246 and 0.344 in the temporal half area and 0.293 and 0.408 in the nasal half area, respectively. The fractional interocular differences of subgroups classified by the locations of superior and inferior peak RNFL thickness showed difference at smaller areas than the absolute interocular differences (19 and 8 points versus 49 and 23 points, respectively). CONCLUSION: Glaucoma can be strongly suspected, if interocular fractional RNFL thickness difference is over 25% at 5 consecutive points or over 35% at 3 consecutive points in the temporal half area. The fractional interocular comparison is a better diagnostic approach because the fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference is less influenced by the locations of peak RNFL thickness. Public Library of Science 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4332477/ /pubmed/25679786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116313 Text en © 2015 Hong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hong, Seung Woo
Lee, Seung Bum
Jee, Dong-hyun
Ahn, Myung Douk
Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults
title Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults
title_full Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults
title_fullStr Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults
title_full_unstemmed Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults
title_short Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults
title_sort interocular retinal nerve fiber layer thickness difference in normal adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116313
work_keys_str_mv AT hongseungwoo interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults
AT leeseungbum interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults
AT jeedonghyun interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults
AT ahnmyungdouk interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults