Cargando…
Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults
PURPOSE: To determine the interocular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness difference of normal subjects. METHODS: Both eyes of 230 normal adults received peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using OCT. The effect of ocular cyclotorsion on the RNFL thickness profile was mathematically cor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116313 |
_version_ | 1782357920195805184 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Seung Woo Lee, Seung Bum Jee, Dong-hyun Ahn, Myung Douk |
author_facet | Hong, Seung Woo Lee, Seung Bum Jee, Dong-hyun Ahn, Myung Douk |
author_sort | Hong, Seung Woo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the interocular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness difference of normal subjects. METHODS: Both eyes of 230 normal adults received peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using OCT. The effect of ocular cyclotorsion on the RNFL thickness profile was mathematically corrected. The fractional and absolute interocular RNFL thickness differences at 256 points of peripapillary area were calculated. We divided the subjects into 3 groups according to the locations of superior and inferior peak thickness, respectively, and compared the interocular RNFL thickness differences between the subgroups. RESULTS: The fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference exhibited smaller regional variations than the absolute interocular difference. The means of fractional interocular differences were 0.100 ± 0.077 in the temporal half area and 0.146 ± 0.105 in the nasal half area, and the tolerance limits for the 95th and 99th distributions were about 0.246 and 0.344 in the temporal half area and 0.293 and 0.408 in the nasal half area, respectively. The fractional interocular differences of subgroups classified by the locations of superior and inferior peak RNFL thickness showed difference at smaller areas than the absolute interocular differences (19 and 8 points versus 49 and 23 points, respectively). CONCLUSION: Glaucoma can be strongly suspected, if interocular fractional RNFL thickness difference is over 25% at 5 consecutive points or over 35% at 3 consecutive points in the temporal half area. The fractional interocular comparison is a better diagnostic approach because the fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference is less influenced by the locations of peak RNFL thickness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4332477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43324772015-02-24 Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults Hong, Seung Woo Lee, Seung Bum Jee, Dong-hyun Ahn, Myung Douk PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To determine the interocular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness difference of normal subjects. METHODS: Both eyes of 230 normal adults received peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using OCT. The effect of ocular cyclotorsion on the RNFL thickness profile was mathematically corrected. The fractional and absolute interocular RNFL thickness differences at 256 points of peripapillary area were calculated. We divided the subjects into 3 groups according to the locations of superior and inferior peak thickness, respectively, and compared the interocular RNFL thickness differences between the subgroups. RESULTS: The fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference exhibited smaller regional variations than the absolute interocular difference. The means of fractional interocular differences were 0.100 ± 0.077 in the temporal half area and 0.146 ± 0.105 in the nasal half area, and the tolerance limits for the 95th and 99th distributions were about 0.246 and 0.344 in the temporal half area and 0.293 and 0.408 in the nasal half area, respectively. The fractional interocular differences of subgroups classified by the locations of superior and inferior peak RNFL thickness showed difference at smaller areas than the absolute interocular differences (19 and 8 points versus 49 and 23 points, respectively). CONCLUSION: Glaucoma can be strongly suspected, if interocular fractional RNFL thickness difference is over 25% at 5 consecutive points or over 35% at 3 consecutive points in the temporal half area. The fractional interocular comparison is a better diagnostic approach because the fractional interocular RNFL thickness difference is less influenced by the locations of peak RNFL thickness. Public Library of Science 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4332477/ /pubmed/25679786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116313 Text en © 2015 Hong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hong, Seung Woo Lee, Seung Bum Jee, Dong-hyun Ahn, Myung Douk Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults |
title | Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults |
title_full | Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults |
title_fullStr | Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults |
title_short | Interocular Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Difference in Normal Adults |
title_sort | interocular retinal nerve fiber layer thickness difference in normal adults |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongseungwoo interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults AT leeseungbum interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults AT jeedonghyun interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults AT ahnmyungdouk interocularretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessdifferenceinnormaladults |