Cargando…

Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study

BACKGROUND: Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) are reported to have similar risk factors and similar recommendations apply to manage infected cats. However, some contrasting evidence exists in the literature with regard to commonly reported risk factors. In this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chhetri, Bimal K, Berke, Olaf, Pearl, David L, Bienzle, Dorothee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0339-3
_version_ 1782357953886552064
author Chhetri, Bimal K
Berke, Olaf
Pearl, David L
Bienzle, Dorothee
author_facet Chhetri, Bimal K
Berke, Olaf
Pearl, David L
Bienzle, Dorothee
author_sort Chhetri, Bimal K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) are reported to have similar risk factors and similar recommendations apply to manage infected cats. However, some contrasting evidence exists in the literature with regard to commonly reported risk factors. In this study, we investigated whether the known risk factors for FIV and FeLV infections have a stronger effect for either infection. This retrospective study included samples from 696 cats seropositive for FIV and 593 cats seropositive for FeLV from the United States and Canada. Data were collected during two cross sectional studies, where cats were tested using IDEXX FIV/FeLV ELISA kits. To compare the effect of known risk factors for FIV infection compared to FeLV, using a case-case study design, random intercept logistic regression models were fit including cats’ age, sex, neuter status, outdoor exposure, health status and type of testing facility as independent variables. A random intercept for testing facility was included to account for clustering expected in testing practices at the individual clinics and shelters. RESULTS: In the multivariable random intercept model, the odds of FIV compared to FeLV positive ELISA results were greater for adults (OR = 2.09, CI: 1.50-2.92), intact males (OR = 3.14, CI: 1.85-3.76), neutered males (OR = 2.68, CI: 1.44- 3.14), cats with outdoor access (OR = 2.58, CI: 1.85-3.76) and lower for cats with clinical illness (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.52-0.90). The variance components obtained from the model indicated clustering at the testing facility level. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors that have a greater effect on FIV seropositivity include adulthood, being male (neutered or not) and having access to outdoors, while clinical illness was a stronger predictor for FeLV seropositivity. Further studies are warranted to assess the implications of these results for the management and control of these infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4332748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43327482015-02-20 Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study Chhetri, Bimal K Berke, Olaf Pearl, David L Bienzle, Dorothee BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) are reported to have similar risk factors and similar recommendations apply to manage infected cats. However, some contrasting evidence exists in the literature with regard to commonly reported risk factors. In this study, we investigated whether the known risk factors for FIV and FeLV infections have a stronger effect for either infection. This retrospective study included samples from 696 cats seropositive for FIV and 593 cats seropositive for FeLV from the United States and Canada. Data were collected during two cross sectional studies, where cats were tested using IDEXX FIV/FeLV ELISA kits. To compare the effect of known risk factors for FIV infection compared to FeLV, using a case-case study design, random intercept logistic regression models were fit including cats’ age, sex, neuter status, outdoor exposure, health status and type of testing facility as independent variables. A random intercept for testing facility was included to account for clustering expected in testing practices at the individual clinics and shelters. RESULTS: In the multivariable random intercept model, the odds of FIV compared to FeLV positive ELISA results were greater for adults (OR = 2.09, CI: 1.50-2.92), intact males (OR = 3.14, CI: 1.85-3.76), neutered males (OR = 2.68, CI: 1.44- 3.14), cats with outdoor access (OR = 2.58, CI: 1.85-3.76) and lower for cats with clinical illness (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.52-0.90). The variance components obtained from the model indicated clustering at the testing facility level. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors that have a greater effect on FIV seropositivity include adulthood, being male (neutered or not) and having access to outdoors, while clinical illness was a stronger predictor for FeLV seropositivity. Further studies are warranted to assess the implications of these results for the management and control of these infections. BioMed Central 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4332748/ /pubmed/25889006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0339-3 Text en © Chhetri et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chhetri, Bimal K
Berke, Olaf
Pearl, David L
Bienzle, Dorothee
Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study
title Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study
title_full Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study
title_fullStr Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study
title_short Comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study
title_sort comparison of risk factors for seropositivity to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats: a case-case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4332748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0339-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chhetribimalk comparisonofriskfactorsforseropositivitytofelineimmunodeficiencyvirusandfelineleukemiavirusamongcatsacasecasestudy
AT berkeolaf comparisonofriskfactorsforseropositivitytofelineimmunodeficiencyvirusandfelineleukemiavirusamongcatsacasecasestudy
AT pearldavidl comparisonofriskfactorsforseropositivitytofelineimmunodeficiencyvirusandfelineleukemiavirusamongcatsacasecasestudy
AT bienzledorothee comparisonofriskfactorsforseropositivitytofelineimmunodeficiencyvirusandfelineleukemiavirusamongcatsacasecasestudy