Cargando…

The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) remain a common problem, with 40,000 new cases in the United Kingdom each year and up to 250,000 in the United States. Traditional management of MPE usually involves an inpatient stay with placement of a chest drain, followed by the instillation of a pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatnagar, Rahul, Kahan, Brennan C, Morley, Anna J, Keenan, Emma K, Miller, Robert F, Rahman, Najib M, Maskell, Nick A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0563-y
_version_ 1782357989722685440
author Bhatnagar, Rahul
Kahan, Brennan C
Morley, Anna J
Keenan, Emma K
Miller, Robert F
Rahman, Najib M
Maskell, Nick A
author_facet Bhatnagar, Rahul
Kahan, Brennan C
Morley, Anna J
Keenan, Emma K
Miller, Robert F
Rahman, Najib M
Maskell, Nick A
author_sort Bhatnagar, Rahul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) remain a common problem, with 40,000 new cases in the United Kingdom each year and up to 250,000 in the United States. Traditional management of MPE usually involves an inpatient stay with placement of a chest drain, followed by the instillation of a pleural sclerosing agent such as talc, which aims to minimise further fluid build-up. Despite a good success rate in studies, this approach can be expensive, time-consuming and inconvenient for patients. More recently, an alternative method has become available in the form of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs), which can be inserted and managed in an outpatient setting. It is currently unknown whether combining talc pleurodesis with IPCs will provide improved pleural symphysis rates over those of IPCs alone. METHODS/DESIGN: IPC-PLUS is a patient-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the combination of talc with an IPC to the use of an IPC alone for inducing pleurodesis in MPEs. The primary outcome is successful pleurodesis at five weeks post-randomisation. This study will recruit 154 patients, with an interim analysis for efficacy after 100 patients, and aims to help to define the future gold standard for outpatient management of patients with symptomatic MPEs. DISCUSSION: IPC-PLUS is the first RCT to examine the practicality and utility of talc administered via an IPC. The study remains in active recruitment and has the potential to significantly alter how patients requiring pleurodesis for MPE are approached in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN73255764) on 23 August 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4333179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43331792015-02-20 The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Bhatnagar, Rahul Kahan, Brennan C Morley, Anna J Keenan, Emma K Miller, Robert F Rahman, Najib M Maskell, Nick A Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) remain a common problem, with 40,000 new cases in the United Kingdom each year and up to 250,000 in the United States. Traditional management of MPE usually involves an inpatient stay with placement of a chest drain, followed by the instillation of a pleural sclerosing agent such as talc, which aims to minimise further fluid build-up. Despite a good success rate in studies, this approach can be expensive, time-consuming and inconvenient for patients. More recently, an alternative method has become available in the form of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs), which can be inserted and managed in an outpatient setting. It is currently unknown whether combining talc pleurodesis with IPCs will provide improved pleural symphysis rates over those of IPCs alone. METHODS/DESIGN: IPC-PLUS is a patient-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the combination of talc with an IPC to the use of an IPC alone for inducing pleurodesis in MPEs. The primary outcome is successful pleurodesis at five weeks post-randomisation. This study will recruit 154 patients, with an interim analysis for efficacy after 100 patients, and aims to help to define the future gold standard for outpatient management of patients with symptomatic MPEs. DISCUSSION: IPC-PLUS is the first RCT to examine the practicality and utility of talc administered via an IPC. The study remains in active recruitment and has the potential to significantly alter how patients requiring pleurodesis for MPE are approached in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN73255764) on 23 August 2012. BioMed Central 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4333179/ /pubmed/25880969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0563-y Text en © Bhatnagar et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bhatnagar, Rahul
Kahan, Brennan C
Morley, Anna J
Keenan, Emma K
Miller, Robert F
Rahman, Najib M
Maskell, Nick A
The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short The efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (IPC-PLUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of indwelling pleural catheter placement versus placement plus talc sclerosant in patients with malignant pleural effusions managed exclusively as outpatients (ipc-plus): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0563-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatnagarrahul theefficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kahanbrennanc theefficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morleyannaj theefficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keenanemmak theefficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT millerrobertf theefficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rahmannajibm theefficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maskellnicka theefficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bhatnagarrahul efficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kahanbrennanc efficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morleyannaj efficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keenanemmak efficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT millerrobertf efficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rahmannajibm efficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maskellnicka efficacyofindwellingpleuralcatheterplacementversusplacementplustalcsclerosantinpatientswithmalignantpleuraleffusionsmanagedexclusivelyasoutpatientsipcplusstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial