Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Screening programmes exist in many countries for colorectal cancer. In recent years, there has been a drive for a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Stool-based pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (M2-PK) is one such biomarker under investigation. The aim of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0446-4 |
_version_ | 1782358001604100096 |
---|---|
author | Uppara, Mallikarjuna Adaba, Franklin Askari, Alan Clark, Susan Hanna, George Athanasiou, Thanos Faiz, Omar |
author_facet | Uppara, Mallikarjuna Adaba, Franklin Askari, Alan Clark, Susan Hanna, George Athanasiou, Thanos Faiz, Omar |
author_sort | Uppara, Mallikarjuna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Screening programmes exist in many countries for colorectal cancer. In recent years, there has been a drive for a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Stool-based pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (M2-PK) is one such biomarker under investigation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of M2-PK as a screening tool in colorectal cancer. METHODS: A literature search of Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar was carried out. The search strategy was restricted to human subjects and studies published in English. Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted and pooled. Statistical analysis was conducted using summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve methodology. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were suitable for data synthesis and analysis. Our analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity for M2-PK to be 79% (CI 73%–83%) and 80% (CI 73%–86%), respectively. The accuracy of M2-PK was 0.85(0.82–0.88). CONCLUSION: Faecal M2-PK assay has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity and high accuracy for screening colorectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4333243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43332432015-02-20 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer Uppara, Mallikarjuna Adaba, Franklin Askari, Alan Clark, Susan Hanna, George Athanasiou, Thanos Faiz, Omar World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: Screening programmes exist in many countries for colorectal cancer. In recent years, there has been a drive for a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Stool-based pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (M2-PK) is one such biomarker under investigation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of M2-PK as a screening tool in colorectal cancer. METHODS: A literature search of Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar was carried out. The search strategy was restricted to human subjects and studies published in English. Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted and pooled. Statistical analysis was conducted using summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve methodology. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were suitable for data synthesis and analysis. Our analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity for M2-PK to be 79% (CI 73%–83%) and 80% (CI 73%–86%), respectively. The accuracy of M2-PK was 0.85(0.82–0.88). CONCLUSION: Faecal M2-PK assay has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity and high accuracy for screening colorectal cancer. BioMed Central 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4333243/ /pubmed/25888768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0446-4 Text en © Uppara et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Uppara, Mallikarjuna Adaba, Franklin Askari, Alan Clark, Susan Hanna, George Athanasiou, Thanos Faiz, Omar A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase m2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0446-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT upparamallikarjuna asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT adabafranklin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT askarialan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT clarksusan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT hannageorge asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT athanasiouthanos asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT faizomar asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT upparamallikarjuna systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT adabafranklin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT askarialan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT clarksusan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT hannageorge systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT athanasiouthanos systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer AT faizomar systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer |