Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Screening programmes exist in many countries for colorectal cancer. In recent years, there has been a drive for a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Stool-based pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (M2-PK) is one such biomarker under investigation. The aim of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uppara, Mallikarjuna, Adaba, Franklin, Askari, Alan, Clark, Susan, Hanna, George, Athanasiou, Thanos, Faiz, Omar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0446-4
_version_ 1782358001604100096
author Uppara, Mallikarjuna
Adaba, Franklin
Askari, Alan
Clark, Susan
Hanna, George
Athanasiou, Thanos
Faiz, Omar
author_facet Uppara, Mallikarjuna
Adaba, Franklin
Askari, Alan
Clark, Susan
Hanna, George
Athanasiou, Thanos
Faiz, Omar
author_sort Uppara, Mallikarjuna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening programmes exist in many countries for colorectal cancer. In recent years, there has been a drive for a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Stool-based pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (M2-PK) is one such biomarker under investigation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of M2-PK as a screening tool in colorectal cancer. METHODS: A literature search of Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar was carried out. The search strategy was restricted to human subjects and studies published in English. Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted and pooled. Statistical analysis was conducted using summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve methodology. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were suitable for data synthesis and analysis. Our analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity for M2-PK to be 79% (CI 73%–83%) and 80% (CI 73%–86%), respectively. The accuracy of M2-PK was 0.85(0.82–0.88). CONCLUSION: Faecal M2-PK assay has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity and high accuracy for screening colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4333243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43332432015-02-20 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer Uppara, Mallikarjuna Adaba, Franklin Askari, Alan Clark, Susan Hanna, George Athanasiou, Thanos Faiz, Omar World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: Screening programmes exist in many countries for colorectal cancer. In recent years, there has been a drive for a non-invasive screening marker of higher sensitivity and specificity. Stool-based pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (M2-PK) is one such biomarker under investigation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of M2-PK as a screening tool in colorectal cancer. METHODS: A literature search of Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar was carried out. The search strategy was restricted to human subjects and studies published in English. Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted and pooled. Statistical analysis was conducted using summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve methodology. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were suitable for data synthesis and analysis. Our analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity for M2-PK to be 79% (CI 73%–83%) and 80% (CI 73%–86%), respectively. The accuracy of M2-PK was 0.85(0.82–0.88). CONCLUSION: Faecal M2-PK assay has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity and high accuracy for screening colorectal cancer. BioMed Central 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4333243/ /pubmed/25888768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0446-4 Text en © Uppara et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Uppara, Mallikarjuna
Adaba, Franklin
Askari, Alan
Clark, Susan
Hanna, George
Athanasiou, Thanos
Faiz, Omar
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase M2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of pyruvate kinase m2 isoenzymatic assay in diagnosing colorectal cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0446-4
work_keys_str_mv AT upparamallikarjuna asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT adabafranklin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT askarialan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT clarksusan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT hannageorge asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT athanasiouthanos asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT faizomar asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT upparamallikarjuna systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT adabafranklin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT askarialan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT clarksusan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT hannageorge systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT athanasiouthanos systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer
AT faizomar systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofpyruvatekinasem2isoenzymaticassayindiagnosingcolorectalcancer