Cargando…
Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis
Background. The role of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis is not yet established. The aim of our prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early LC for acute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed LC. Method...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/349801 |
_version_ | 1782358020044357632 |
---|---|
author | Agrawal, Rati Sood, K. C. Agarwal, Bhupender |
author_facet | Agrawal, Rati Sood, K. C. Agarwal, Bhupender |
author_sort | Agrawal, Rati |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The role of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis is not yet established. The aim of our prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early LC for acute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed LC. Methods. Between March 2007 to December 2008, 50 patients with diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were assigned randomly to early group, n = 25 (LC within 24 hrs of admission), and delayed group, n = 25 (initial conservative treatment followed by delayed LC, 6–8 weeks later). Results. We found in our study that the conversion rate in early LC and delayed LC was 16% and 8%, respectively, Operation time for early LC was 69.4 min versus 66.4 min for delayed LC, postoperative complications for early LC were 24% versus 8% for delayed LC, and blood loss was 159.6 mL early group versus 146.8 mL for delayed group. However early LC had significantly shorter hospital stay (4.1 days versus 8.6 days). Conclusions. Early LC for acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis is safe and feasible, offering the additional benefit of shorter hospital stay. It should be offered to the patients with acute cholecystitis, provided that the surgery is performed within 96 hrs of acute symptoms by an experienced surgeon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4333337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43333372015-03-01 Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis Agrawal, Rati Sood, K. C. Agarwal, Bhupender Surg Res Pract Clinical Study Background. The role of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis is not yet established. The aim of our prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early LC for acute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed LC. Methods. Between March 2007 to December 2008, 50 patients with diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were assigned randomly to early group, n = 25 (LC within 24 hrs of admission), and delayed group, n = 25 (initial conservative treatment followed by delayed LC, 6–8 weeks later). Results. We found in our study that the conversion rate in early LC and delayed LC was 16% and 8%, respectively, Operation time for early LC was 69.4 min versus 66.4 min for delayed LC, postoperative complications for early LC were 24% versus 8% for delayed LC, and blood loss was 159.6 mL early group versus 146.8 mL for delayed group. However early LC had significantly shorter hospital stay (4.1 days versus 8.6 days). Conclusions. Early LC for acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis is safe and feasible, offering the additional benefit of shorter hospital stay. It should be offered to the patients with acute cholecystitis, provided that the surgery is performed within 96 hrs of acute symptoms by an experienced surgeon. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4333337/ /pubmed/25729775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/349801 Text en Copyright © 2015 Rati Agrawal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Agrawal, Rati Sood, K. C. Agarwal, Bhupender Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis |
title | Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis |
title_full | Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis |
title_short | Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis |
title_sort | evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/349801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agrawalrati evaluationofearlyversusdelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinacutecholecystitis AT soodkc evaluationofearlyversusdelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinacutecholecystitis AT agarwalbhupender evaluationofearlyversusdelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinacutecholecystitis |