Cargando…
Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study
BACKGROUND: Incomplete surgical staging is a negative prognostic factor for patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of each individual staging procedure. METHODS: Clinical parameters of 950 patients with BOT (confirmed by central reference...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.648 |
_version_ | 1782358046603739136 |
---|---|
author | Trillsch, F Mahner, S Vettorazzi, E Woelber, L Reuss, A Baumann, K Keyver-Paik, M-D Canzler, U Wollschlaeger, K Forner, D Pfisterer, J Schroeder, W Muenstedt, K Richter, B Fotopoulou, C Schmalfeldt, B Burges, A Ewald-Riegler, N de Gregorio, N Hilpert, F Fehm, T Meier, W Hillemanns, P Hanker, L Hasenburg, A Strauss, H-G Hellriegel, M Wimberger, P Kommoss, S Kommoss, F Hauptmann, S du Bois, A |
author_facet | Trillsch, F Mahner, S Vettorazzi, E Woelber, L Reuss, A Baumann, K Keyver-Paik, M-D Canzler, U Wollschlaeger, K Forner, D Pfisterer, J Schroeder, W Muenstedt, K Richter, B Fotopoulou, C Schmalfeldt, B Burges, A Ewald-Riegler, N de Gregorio, N Hilpert, F Fehm, T Meier, W Hillemanns, P Hanker, L Hasenburg, A Strauss, H-G Hellriegel, M Wimberger, P Kommoss, S Kommoss, F Hauptmann, S du Bois, A |
author_sort | Trillsch, F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incomplete surgical staging is a negative prognostic factor for patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of each individual staging procedure. METHODS: Clinical parameters of 950 patients with BOT (confirmed by central reference pathology) treated between 1998 and 2008 at 24 German AGO centres were analysed. In 559 patients with serous BOT and adequate ovarian surgery, further recommended staging procedures (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies, cytology) were evaluated applying Cox regression models with respect to progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: For patients with one missing staging procedure, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 1.25 (95%-CI 0.66–2.39; P=0.497). This risk increased with each additional procedure skipped reaching statistical significance in case of two (HR 1.95; 95%-CI 1.06–3.58; P=0.031) and three missing steps (HR 2.37; 95%-CI 1.22–4.64; P=0.011). The most crucial procedure was omentectomy which retained a statistically significant impact on PFS in multiple analysis (HR 1.91; 95%-CI 1.15–3.19; P=0.013) adjusting for previously established prognostic factors as FIGO stage, tumour residuals, and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION: Individual surgical staging procedures contribute to the prognosis for patients with serous BOT. In this analysis, recurrence risk increased with each skipped surgical step. This should be considered when re-staging procedures following incomplete primary surgery are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4333495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43334952016-02-17 Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study Trillsch, F Mahner, S Vettorazzi, E Woelber, L Reuss, A Baumann, K Keyver-Paik, M-D Canzler, U Wollschlaeger, K Forner, D Pfisterer, J Schroeder, W Muenstedt, K Richter, B Fotopoulou, C Schmalfeldt, B Burges, A Ewald-Riegler, N de Gregorio, N Hilpert, F Fehm, T Meier, W Hillemanns, P Hanker, L Hasenburg, A Strauss, H-G Hellriegel, M Wimberger, P Kommoss, S Kommoss, F Hauptmann, S du Bois, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Incomplete surgical staging is a negative prognostic factor for patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of each individual staging procedure. METHODS: Clinical parameters of 950 patients with BOT (confirmed by central reference pathology) treated between 1998 and 2008 at 24 German AGO centres were analysed. In 559 patients with serous BOT and adequate ovarian surgery, further recommended staging procedures (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies, cytology) were evaluated applying Cox regression models with respect to progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: For patients with one missing staging procedure, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 1.25 (95%-CI 0.66–2.39; P=0.497). This risk increased with each additional procedure skipped reaching statistical significance in case of two (HR 1.95; 95%-CI 1.06–3.58; P=0.031) and three missing steps (HR 2.37; 95%-CI 1.22–4.64; P=0.011). The most crucial procedure was omentectomy which retained a statistically significant impact on PFS in multiple analysis (HR 1.91; 95%-CI 1.15–3.19; P=0.013) adjusting for previously established prognostic factors as FIGO stage, tumour residuals, and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION: Individual surgical staging procedures contribute to the prognosis for patients with serous BOT. In this analysis, recurrence risk increased with each skipped surgical step. This should be considered when re-staging procedures following incomplete primary surgery are discussed. Nature Publishing Group 2015-02-17 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4333495/ /pubmed/25562434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.648 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Trillsch, F Mahner, S Vettorazzi, E Woelber, L Reuss, A Baumann, K Keyver-Paik, M-D Canzler, U Wollschlaeger, K Forner, D Pfisterer, J Schroeder, W Muenstedt, K Richter, B Fotopoulou, C Schmalfeldt, B Burges, A Ewald-Riegler, N de Gregorio, N Hilpert, F Fehm, T Meier, W Hillemanns, P Hanker, L Hasenburg, A Strauss, H-G Hellriegel, M Wimberger, P Kommoss, S Kommoss, F Hauptmann, S du Bois, A Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study |
title | Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study |
title_full | Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study |
title_fullStr | Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study |
title_short | Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study |
title_sort | surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (bot): a subanalysis of the ago robot study |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.648 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trillschf surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT mahners surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT vettorazzie surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT woelberl surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT reussa surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT baumannk surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT keyverpaikmd surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT canzleru surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT wollschlaegerk surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT fornerd surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT pfistererj surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT schroederw surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT muenstedtk surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT richterb surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT fotopoulouc surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT schmalfeldtb surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT burgesa surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT ewaldrieglern surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT degregorion surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT hilpertf surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT fehmt surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT meierw surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT hillemannsp surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT hankerl surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT hasenburga surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT strausshg surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT hellriegelm surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT wimbergerp surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT kommosss surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT kommossf surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT hauptmanns surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy AT duboisa surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy |