Cargando…

Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study

BACKGROUND: Incomplete surgical staging is a negative prognostic factor for patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of each individual staging procedure. METHODS: Clinical parameters of 950 patients with BOT (confirmed by central reference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trillsch, F, Mahner, S, Vettorazzi, E, Woelber, L, Reuss, A, Baumann, K, Keyver-Paik, M-D, Canzler, U, Wollschlaeger, K, Forner, D, Pfisterer, J, Schroeder, W, Muenstedt, K, Richter, B, Fotopoulou, C, Schmalfeldt, B, Burges, A, Ewald-Riegler, N, de Gregorio, N, Hilpert, F, Fehm, T, Meier, W, Hillemanns, P, Hanker, L, Hasenburg, A, Strauss, H-G, Hellriegel, M, Wimberger, P, Kommoss, S, Kommoss, F, Hauptmann, S, du Bois, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.648
_version_ 1782358046603739136
author Trillsch, F
Mahner, S
Vettorazzi, E
Woelber, L
Reuss, A
Baumann, K
Keyver-Paik, M-D
Canzler, U
Wollschlaeger, K
Forner, D
Pfisterer, J
Schroeder, W
Muenstedt, K
Richter, B
Fotopoulou, C
Schmalfeldt, B
Burges, A
Ewald-Riegler, N
de Gregorio, N
Hilpert, F
Fehm, T
Meier, W
Hillemanns, P
Hanker, L
Hasenburg, A
Strauss, H-G
Hellriegel, M
Wimberger, P
Kommoss, S
Kommoss, F
Hauptmann, S
du Bois, A
author_facet Trillsch, F
Mahner, S
Vettorazzi, E
Woelber, L
Reuss, A
Baumann, K
Keyver-Paik, M-D
Canzler, U
Wollschlaeger, K
Forner, D
Pfisterer, J
Schroeder, W
Muenstedt, K
Richter, B
Fotopoulou, C
Schmalfeldt, B
Burges, A
Ewald-Riegler, N
de Gregorio, N
Hilpert, F
Fehm, T
Meier, W
Hillemanns, P
Hanker, L
Hasenburg, A
Strauss, H-G
Hellriegel, M
Wimberger, P
Kommoss, S
Kommoss, F
Hauptmann, S
du Bois, A
author_sort Trillsch, F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incomplete surgical staging is a negative prognostic factor for patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of each individual staging procedure. METHODS: Clinical parameters of 950 patients with BOT (confirmed by central reference pathology) treated between 1998 and 2008 at 24 German AGO centres were analysed. In 559 patients with serous BOT and adequate ovarian surgery, further recommended staging procedures (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies, cytology) were evaluated applying Cox regression models with respect to progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: For patients with one missing staging procedure, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 1.25 (95%-CI 0.66–2.39; P=0.497). This risk increased with each additional procedure skipped reaching statistical significance in case of two (HR 1.95; 95%-CI 1.06–3.58; P=0.031) and three missing steps (HR 2.37; 95%-CI 1.22–4.64; P=0.011). The most crucial procedure was omentectomy which retained a statistically significant impact on PFS in multiple analysis (HR 1.91; 95%-CI 1.15–3.19; P=0.013) adjusting for previously established prognostic factors as FIGO stage, tumour residuals, and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION: Individual surgical staging procedures contribute to the prognosis for patients with serous BOT. In this analysis, recurrence risk increased with each skipped surgical step. This should be considered when re-staging procedures following incomplete primary surgery are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4333495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43334952016-02-17 Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study Trillsch, F Mahner, S Vettorazzi, E Woelber, L Reuss, A Baumann, K Keyver-Paik, M-D Canzler, U Wollschlaeger, K Forner, D Pfisterer, J Schroeder, W Muenstedt, K Richter, B Fotopoulou, C Schmalfeldt, B Burges, A Ewald-Riegler, N de Gregorio, N Hilpert, F Fehm, T Meier, W Hillemanns, P Hanker, L Hasenburg, A Strauss, H-G Hellriegel, M Wimberger, P Kommoss, S Kommoss, F Hauptmann, S du Bois, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Incomplete surgical staging is a negative prognostic factor for patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). However, little is known about the prognostic impact of each individual staging procedure. METHODS: Clinical parameters of 950 patients with BOT (confirmed by central reference pathology) treated between 1998 and 2008 at 24 German AGO centres were analysed. In 559 patients with serous BOT and adequate ovarian surgery, further recommended staging procedures (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies, cytology) were evaluated applying Cox regression models with respect to progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: For patients with one missing staging procedure, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 1.25 (95%-CI 0.66–2.39; P=0.497). This risk increased with each additional procedure skipped reaching statistical significance in case of two (HR 1.95; 95%-CI 1.06–3.58; P=0.031) and three missing steps (HR 2.37; 95%-CI 1.22–4.64; P=0.011). The most crucial procedure was omentectomy which retained a statistically significant impact on PFS in multiple analysis (HR 1.91; 95%-CI 1.15–3.19; P=0.013) adjusting for previously established prognostic factors as FIGO stage, tumour residuals, and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION: Individual surgical staging procedures contribute to the prognosis for patients with serous BOT. In this analysis, recurrence risk increased with each skipped surgical step. This should be considered when re-staging procedures following incomplete primary surgery are discussed. Nature Publishing Group 2015-02-17 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4333495/ /pubmed/25562434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.648 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Trillsch, F
Mahner, S
Vettorazzi, E
Woelber, L
Reuss, A
Baumann, K
Keyver-Paik, M-D
Canzler, U
Wollschlaeger, K
Forner, D
Pfisterer, J
Schroeder, W
Muenstedt, K
Richter, B
Fotopoulou, C
Schmalfeldt, B
Burges, A
Ewald-Riegler, N
de Gregorio, N
Hilpert, F
Fehm, T
Meier, W
Hillemanns, P
Hanker, L
Hasenburg, A
Strauss, H-G
Hellriegel, M
Wimberger, P
Kommoss, S
Kommoss, F
Hauptmann, S
du Bois, A
Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study
title Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study
title_full Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study
title_fullStr Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study
title_full_unstemmed Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study
title_short Surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (BOT): A subanalysis of the AGO ROBOT study
title_sort surgical staging and prognosis in serous borderline ovarian tumours (bot): a subanalysis of the ago robot study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.648
work_keys_str_mv AT trillschf surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT mahners surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT vettorazzie surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT woelberl surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT reussa surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT baumannk surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT keyverpaikmd surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT canzleru surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT wollschlaegerk surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT fornerd surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT pfistererj surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT schroederw surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT muenstedtk surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT richterb surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT fotopoulouc surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT schmalfeldtb surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT burgesa surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT ewaldrieglern surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT degregorion surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT hilpertf surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT fehmt surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT meierw surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT hillemannsp surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT hankerl surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT hasenburga surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT strausshg surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT hellriegelm surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT wimbergerp surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT kommosss surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT kommossf surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT hauptmanns surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy
AT duboisa surgicalstagingandprognosisinserousborderlineovariantumoursbotasubanalysisoftheagorobotstudy