Cargando…
Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
This review examines some of the issues encountered in the use of sedation in patients receiving respiratory support from non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This is an area of critical and intensive care medicine where there are limited (if any) robust data to guide the development of best practice and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-56 |
_version_ | 1782358120744353792 |
---|---|
author | Longrois, Dan Conti, Giorgio Mantz, Jean Faltlhauser, Andreas Aantaa, Riku Tonner, Peter |
author_facet | Longrois, Dan Conti, Giorgio Mantz, Jean Faltlhauser, Andreas Aantaa, Riku Tonner, Peter |
author_sort | Longrois, Dan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review examines some of the issues encountered in the use of sedation in patients receiving respiratory support from non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This is an area of critical and intensive care medicine where there are limited (if any) robust data to guide the development of best practice and where local custom appears to exert a strong influence on patterns of care. We examine aspects of sedation for NIV where the current lack of structure may be contributing to missed opportunities to improve standards of care and examine the existing sedative armamentarium. No single sedative agent is currently available that fulfils the criteria for an ideal agent but we offer some observations on the relative merits of different agents as they relate to considerations such as effects on respiratory drive and timing, and airways patency. The significance of agitation and delirium and the affective aspect(s) of dyspnoea are also considered. We outline an agenda for placing the use of sedation in NIV on a more systematic footing, including clearly expressed criteria and conditions for terminating NIV and structural and organizational conditions for prospective multicentre trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4333891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43338912015-02-20 Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? Longrois, Dan Conti, Giorgio Mantz, Jean Faltlhauser, Andreas Aantaa, Riku Tonner, Peter Multidiscip Respir Med Review This review examines some of the issues encountered in the use of sedation in patients receiving respiratory support from non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This is an area of critical and intensive care medicine where there are limited (if any) robust data to guide the development of best practice and where local custom appears to exert a strong influence on patterns of care. We examine aspects of sedation for NIV where the current lack of structure may be contributing to missed opportunities to improve standards of care and examine the existing sedative armamentarium. No single sedative agent is currently available that fulfils the criteria for an ideal agent but we offer some observations on the relative merits of different agents as they relate to considerations such as effects on respiratory drive and timing, and airways patency. The significance of agitation and delirium and the affective aspect(s) of dyspnoea are also considered. We outline an agenda for placing the use of sedation in NIV on a more systematic footing, including clearly expressed criteria and conditions for terminating NIV and structural and organizational conditions for prospective multicentre trials. BioMed Central 2014-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4333891/ /pubmed/25699177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-56 Text en © Longrois et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Longrois, Dan Conti, Giorgio Mantz, Jean Faltlhauser, Andreas Aantaa, Riku Tonner, Peter Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? |
title | Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? |
title_full | Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? |
title_fullStr | Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? |
title_short | Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? |
title_sort | sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-56 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longroisdan sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy AT contigiorgio sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy AT mantzjean sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy AT faltlhauserandreas sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy AT aantaariku sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy AT tonnerpeter sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy |