Cargando…

Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?

This review examines some of the issues encountered in the use of sedation in patients receiving respiratory support from non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This is an area of critical and intensive care medicine where there are limited (if any) robust data to guide the development of best practice and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longrois, Dan, Conti, Giorgio, Mantz, Jean, Faltlhauser, Andreas, Aantaa, Riku, Tonner, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-56
_version_ 1782358120744353792
author Longrois, Dan
Conti, Giorgio
Mantz, Jean
Faltlhauser, Andreas
Aantaa, Riku
Tonner, Peter
author_facet Longrois, Dan
Conti, Giorgio
Mantz, Jean
Faltlhauser, Andreas
Aantaa, Riku
Tonner, Peter
author_sort Longrois, Dan
collection PubMed
description This review examines some of the issues encountered in the use of sedation in patients receiving respiratory support from non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This is an area of critical and intensive care medicine where there are limited (if any) robust data to guide the development of best practice and where local custom appears to exert a strong influence on patterns of care. We examine aspects of sedation for NIV where the current lack of structure may be contributing to missed opportunities to improve standards of care and examine the existing sedative armamentarium. No single sedative agent is currently available that fulfils the criteria for an ideal agent but we offer some observations on the relative merits of different agents as they relate to considerations such as effects on respiratory drive and timing, and airways patency. The significance of agitation and delirium and the affective aspect(s) of dyspnoea are also considered. We outline an agenda for placing the use of sedation in NIV on a more systematic footing, including clearly expressed criteria and conditions for terminating NIV and structural and organizational conditions for prospective multicentre trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4333891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43338912015-02-20 Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)? Longrois, Dan Conti, Giorgio Mantz, Jean Faltlhauser, Andreas Aantaa, Riku Tonner, Peter Multidiscip Respir Med Review This review examines some of the issues encountered in the use of sedation in patients receiving respiratory support from non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This is an area of critical and intensive care medicine where there are limited (if any) robust data to guide the development of best practice and where local custom appears to exert a strong influence on patterns of care. We examine aspects of sedation for NIV where the current lack of structure may be contributing to missed opportunities to improve standards of care and examine the existing sedative armamentarium. No single sedative agent is currently available that fulfils the criteria for an ideal agent but we offer some observations on the relative merits of different agents as they relate to considerations such as effects on respiratory drive and timing, and airways patency. The significance of agitation and delirium and the affective aspect(s) of dyspnoea are also considered. We outline an agenda for placing the use of sedation in NIV on a more systematic footing, including clearly expressed criteria and conditions for terminating NIV and structural and organizational conditions for prospective multicentre trials. BioMed Central 2014-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4333891/ /pubmed/25699177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-56 Text en © Longrois et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Longrois, Dan
Conti, Giorgio
Mantz, Jean
Faltlhauser, Andreas
Aantaa, Riku
Tonner, Peter
Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
title Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
title_full Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
title_fullStr Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
title_full_unstemmed Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
title_short Sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
title_sort sedation in non-invasive ventilation: do we know what to do (and why)?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-56
work_keys_str_mv AT longroisdan sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy
AT contigiorgio sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy
AT mantzjean sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy
AT faltlhauserandreas sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy
AT aantaariku sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy
AT tonnerpeter sedationinnoninvasiveventilationdoweknowwhattodoandwhy