Cargando…

Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation

The ovarian stimulation has been applied in order to increase the number of oocytes to compensate for the poor results of in vitro fertilization, allowing the selection of one or more embryos to be transferred. Our aim is to compare the results obtained in IVF/ICSI cycles using the short protocol fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coelho, F., Aguiar, L. F., Cunha, G. S. P., Cardinot, N., Lucena, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25763398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/367474
_version_ 1782358135465312256
author Coelho, F.
Aguiar, L. F.
Cunha, G. S. P.
Cardinot, N.
Lucena, E.
author_facet Coelho, F.
Aguiar, L. F.
Cunha, G. S. P.
Cardinot, N.
Lucena, E.
author_sort Coelho, F.
collection PubMed
description The ovarian stimulation has been applied in order to increase the number of oocytes to compensate for the poor results of in vitro fertilization, allowing the selection of one or more embryos to be transferred. Our aim is to compare the results obtained in IVF/ICSI cycles using the short protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation to the results from the modified mild protocol used in our department. A total of 240 cycles were conducted from January 2010 to December 2011. When comparing both protocols, it could be observed that there was a significant difference in the quantity of gonadotropins doses in the mild protocol and in the short protocol. No significant difference was observed regarding pregnancy rates per cycle, 22% and 26.2%, in short and mild protocols, respectively. The protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation are often associated with high risk of complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, excessive emotional stress, high rates of treatment dropouts, and abdominal discomfort. With the data obtained in this study, one can conclude that there are less risks and complications for the patient when using the mild stimulation protocol. It was also observed that in this group there was a slightly higher rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4334054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43340542015-03-11 Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation Coelho, F. Aguiar, L. F. Cunha, G. S. P. Cardinot, N. Lucena, E. Int J Reprod Med Clinical Study The ovarian stimulation has been applied in order to increase the number of oocytes to compensate for the poor results of in vitro fertilization, allowing the selection of one or more embryos to be transferred. Our aim is to compare the results obtained in IVF/ICSI cycles using the short protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation to the results from the modified mild protocol used in our department. A total of 240 cycles were conducted from January 2010 to December 2011. When comparing both protocols, it could be observed that there was a significant difference in the quantity of gonadotropins doses in the mild protocol and in the short protocol. No significant difference was observed regarding pregnancy rates per cycle, 22% and 26.2%, in short and mild protocols, respectively. The protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation are often associated with high risk of complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, excessive emotional stress, high rates of treatment dropouts, and abdominal discomfort. With the data obtained in this study, one can conclude that there are less risks and complications for the patient when using the mild stimulation protocol. It was also observed that in this group there was a slightly higher rate. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4334054/ /pubmed/25763398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/367474 Text en Copyright © 2014 F. Coelho et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Coelho, F.
Aguiar, L. F.
Cunha, G. S. P.
Cardinot, N.
Lucena, E.
Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation
title Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation
title_full Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation
title_fullStr Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation
title_short Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation
title_sort comparison of results of cycles treated with modified mild protocol and short protocol for ovarian stimulation
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25763398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/367474
work_keys_str_mv AT coelhof comparisonofresultsofcyclestreatedwithmodifiedmildprotocolandshortprotocolforovarianstimulation
AT aguiarlf comparisonofresultsofcyclestreatedwithmodifiedmildprotocolandshortprotocolforovarianstimulation
AT cunhagsp comparisonofresultsofcyclestreatedwithmodifiedmildprotocolandshortprotocolforovarianstimulation
AT cardinotn comparisonofresultsofcyclestreatedwithmodifiedmildprotocolandshortprotocolforovarianstimulation
AT lucenae comparisonofresultsofcyclestreatedwithmodifiedmildprotocolandshortprotocolforovarianstimulation