Cargando…

Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzilli, Rossella, Imbrogno, Norina, Elia, Jlenia, Delfino, Michele, Bitterman, Olimpia, Napoli, Angela, Mazzilli, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709482
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S71376
_version_ 1782358168673714176
author Mazzilli, Rossella
Imbrogno, Norina
Elia, Jlenia
Delfino, Michele
Bitterman, Olimpia
Napoli, Angela
Mazzilli, Fernando
author_facet Mazzilli, Rossella
Imbrogno, Norina
Elia, Jlenia
Delfino, Michele
Bitterman, Olimpia
Napoli, Angela
Mazzilli, Fernando
author_sort Mazzilli, Rossella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 healthy women as controls. Each participant was given the nine-item Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire to complete. The metabolic profile was evaluated by body mass index and glycosylated hemoglobin assay. RESULTS: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction (total score ≤30) was significantly higher in the type 1 DM group (25/49, 51%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18–31) than in the control group (4/45, 9%; 95% CI 3–5; P=0.00006); there were no significant variations in the type 2 DM group (4/24, 17%; 95% CI 3–4) versus the control group (P=0.630, not statistically significant). The mean total score was significantly lower in the type 1 DM group (30.2±6.9) versus the control group (36.5±4.9; P=0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the type 2 DM group and the control group (P=0.773). With regard to specific questionnaire items, the mean values for arousal, lubrication, dyspareunia, and orgasm were significantly lower only in the type 1 DM group versus the control group. The mean values for desire were reduced in type 1 and type 2 DM groups versus control group. CONCLUSION: Type 1 DM is associated with sexual dysfunction. This may be due to classic neurovascular complications or to the negative impact of the disease on psychosocial factors. Larger and ideally longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between DM and sexual dysfunction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4334308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43343082015-02-23 Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus Mazzilli, Rossella Imbrogno, Norina Elia, Jlenia Delfino, Michele Bitterman, Olimpia Napoli, Angela Mazzilli, Fernando Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 healthy women as controls. Each participant was given the nine-item Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire to complete. The metabolic profile was evaluated by body mass index and glycosylated hemoglobin assay. RESULTS: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction (total score ≤30) was significantly higher in the type 1 DM group (25/49, 51%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18–31) than in the control group (4/45, 9%; 95% CI 3–5; P=0.00006); there were no significant variations in the type 2 DM group (4/24, 17%; 95% CI 3–4) versus the control group (P=0.630, not statistically significant). The mean total score was significantly lower in the type 1 DM group (30.2±6.9) versus the control group (36.5±4.9; P=0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the type 2 DM group and the control group (P=0.773). With regard to specific questionnaire items, the mean values for arousal, lubrication, dyspareunia, and orgasm were significantly lower only in the type 1 DM group versus the control group. The mean values for desire were reduced in type 1 and type 2 DM groups versus control group. CONCLUSION: Type 1 DM is associated with sexual dysfunction. This may be due to classic neurovascular complications or to the negative impact of the disease on psychosocial factors. Larger and ideally longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between DM and sexual dysfunction. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4334308/ /pubmed/25709482 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S71376 Text en © 2015 Mazzilli et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mazzilli, Rossella
Imbrogno, Norina
Elia, Jlenia
Delfino, Michele
Bitterman, Olimpia
Napoli, Angela
Mazzilli, Fernando
Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709482
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S71376
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzillirossella sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT imbrognonorina sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT eliajlenia sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT delfinomichele sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT bittermanolimpia sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT napoliangela sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT mazzillifernando sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus