Cargando…
Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 heal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709482 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S71376 |
_version_ | 1782358168673714176 |
---|---|
author | Mazzilli, Rossella Imbrogno, Norina Elia, Jlenia Delfino, Michele Bitterman, Olimpia Napoli, Angela Mazzilli, Fernando |
author_facet | Mazzilli, Rossella Imbrogno, Norina Elia, Jlenia Delfino, Michele Bitterman, Olimpia Napoli, Angela Mazzilli, Fernando |
author_sort | Mazzilli, Rossella |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 healthy women as controls. Each participant was given the nine-item Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire to complete. The metabolic profile was evaluated by body mass index and glycosylated hemoglobin assay. RESULTS: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction (total score ≤30) was significantly higher in the type 1 DM group (25/49, 51%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18–31) than in the control group (4/45, 9%; 95% CI 3–5; P=0.00006); there were no significant variations in the type 2 DM group (4/24, 17%; 95% CI 3–4) versus the control group (P=0.630, not statistically significant). The mean total score was significantly lower in the type 1 DM group (30.2±6.9) versus the control group (36.5±4.9; P=0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the type 2 DM group and the control group (P=0.773). With regard to specific questionnaire items, the mean values for arousal, lubrication, dyspareunia, and orgasm were significantly lower only in the type 1 DM group versus the control group. The mean values for desire were reduced in type 1 and type 2 DM groups versus control group. CONCLUSION: Type 1 DM is associated with sexual dysfunction. This may be due to classic neurovascular complications or to the negative impact of the disease on psychosocial factors. Larger and ideally longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between DM and sexual dysfunction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4334308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43343082015-02-23 Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus Mazzilli, Rossella Imbrogno, Norina Elia, Jlenia Delfino, Michele Bitterman, Olimpia Napoli, Angela Mazzilli, Fernando Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 healthy women as controls. Each participant was given the nine-item Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire to complete. The metabolic profile was evaluated by body mass index and glycosylated hemoglobin assay. RESULTS: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction (total score ≤30) was significantly higher in the type 1 DM group (25/49, 51%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18–31) than in the control group (4/45, 9%; 95% CI 3–5; P=0.00006); there were no significant variations in the type 2 DM group (4/24, 17%; 95% CI 3–4) versus the control group (P=0.630, not statistically significant). The mean total score was significantly lower in the type 1 DM group (30.2±6.9) versus the control group (36.5±4.9; P=0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the type 2 DM group and the control group (P=0.773). With regard to specific questionnaire items, the mean values for arousal, lubrication, dyspareunia, and orgasm were significantly lower only in the type 1 DM group versus the control group. The mean values for desire were reduced in type 1 and type 2 DM groups versus control group. CONCLUSION: Type 1 DM is associated with sexual dysfunction. This may be due to classic neurovascular complications or to the negative impact of the disease on psychosocial factors. Larger and ideally longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between DM and sexual dysfunction. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4334308/ /pubmed/25709482 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S71376 Text en © 2015 Mazzilli et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mazzilli, Rossella Imbrogno, Norina Elia, Jlenia Delfino, Michele Bitterman, Olimpia Napoli, Angela Mazzilli, Fernando Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title | Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_full | Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_fullStr | Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_short | Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_sort | sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709482 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S71376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzillirossella sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus AT imbrognonorina sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus AT eliajlenia sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus AT delfinomichele sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus AT bittermanolimpia sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus AT napoliangela sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus AT mazzillifernando sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus |