Cargando…

Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding

Fine-scale temporal organization of cortical activity in the gamma range (∼25–80Hz) may play a significant role in information processing, for example by neural grouping (‘binding’) and phase coding. Recent experimental studies have shown that the precise frequency of gamma oscillations varies with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowet, Eric, Roberts, Mark, Hadjipapas, Avgis, Peter, Alina, van der Eerden, Jan, De Weerd, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004072
_version_ 1782358207885213696
author Lowet, Eric
Roberts, Mark
Hadjipapas, Avgis
Peter, Alina
van der Eerden, Jan
De Weerd, Peter
author_facet Lowet, Eric
Roberts, Mark
Hadjipapas, Avgis
Peter, Alina
van der Eerden, Jan
De Weerd, Peter
author_sort Lowet, Eric
collection PubMed
description Fine-scale temporal organization of cortical activity in the gamma range (∼25–80Hz) may play a significant role in information processing, for example by neural grouping (‘binding’) and phase coding. Recent experimental studies have shown that the precise frequency of gamma oscillations varies with input drive (e.g. visual contrast) and that it can differ among nearby cortical locations. This has challenged theories assuming widespread gamma synchronization at a fixed common frequency. In the present study, we investigated which principles govern gamma synchronization in the presence of input-dependent frequency modulations and whether they are detrimental for meaningful input-dependent gamma-mediated temporal organization. To this aim, we constructed a biophysically realistic excitatory-inhibitory network able to express different oscillation frequencies at nearby spatial locations. Similarly to cortical networks, the model was topographically organized with spatially local connectivity and spatially-varying input drive. We analyzed gamma synchronization with respect to phase-locking, phase-relations and frequency differences, and quantified the stimulus-related information represented by gamma phase and frequency. By stepwise simplification of our models, we found that the gamma-mediated temporal organization could be reduced to basic synchronization principles of weakly coupled oscillators, where input drive determines the intrinsic (natural) frequency of oscillators. The gamma phase-locking, the precise phase relation and the emergent (measurable) frequencies were determined by two principal factors: the detuning (intrinsic frequency difference, i.e. local input difference) and the coupling strength. In addition to frequency coding, gamma phase contained complementary stimulus information. Crucially, the phase code reflected input differences, but not the absolute input level. This property of relative input-to-phase conversion, contrasting with latency codes or slower oscillation phase codes, may resolve conflicting experimental observations on gamma phase coding. Our modeling results offer clear testable experimental predictions. We conclude that input-dependency of gamma frequencies could be essential rather than detrimental for meaningful gamma-mediated temporal organization of cortical activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4334551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43345512015-02-24 Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding Lowet, Eric Roberts, Mark Hadjipapas, Avgis Peter, Alina van der Eerden, Jan De Weerd, Peter PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Fine-scale temporal organization of cortical activity in the gamma range (∼25–80Hz) may play a significant role in information processing, for example by neural grouping (‘binding’) and phase coding. Recent experimental studies have shown that the precise frequency of gamma oscillations varies with input drive (e.g. visual contrast) and that it can differ among nearby cortical locations. This has challenged theories assuming widespread gamma synchronization at a fixed common frequency. In the present study, we investigated which principles govern gamma synchronization in the presence of input-dependent frequency modulations and whether they are detrimental for meaningful input-dependent gamma-mediated temporal organization. To this aim, we constructed a biophysically realistic excitatory-inhibitory network able to express different oscillation frequencies at nearby spatial locations. Similarly to cortical networks, the model was topographically organized with spatially local connectivity and spatially-varying input drive. We analyzed gamma synchronization with respect to phase-locking, phase-relations and frequency differences, and quantified the stimulus-related information represented by gamma phase and frequency. By stepwise simplification of our models, we found that the gamma-mediated temporal organization could be reduced to basic synchronization principles of weakly coupled oscillators, where input drive determines the intrinsic (natural) frequency of oscillators. The gamma phase-locking, the precise phase relation and the emergent (measurable) frequencies were determined by two principal factors: the detuning (intrinsic frequency difference, i.e. local input difference) and the coupling strength. In addition to frequency coding, gamma phase contained complementary stimulus information. Crucially, the phase code reflected input differences, but not the absolute input level. This property of relative input-to-phase conversion, contrasting with latency codes or slower oscillation phase codes, may resolve conflicting experimental observations on gamma phase coding. Our modeling results offer clear testable experimental predictions. We conclude that input-dependency of gamma frequencies could be essential rather than detrimental for meaningful gamma-mediated temporal organization of cortical activity. Public Library of Science 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4334551/ /pubmed/25679780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004072 Text en © 2015 Lowet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lowet, Eric
Roberts, Mark
Hadjipapas, Avgis
Peter, Alina
van der Eerden, Jan
De Weerd, Peter
Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding
title Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding
title_full Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding
title_fullStr Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding
title_full_unstemmed Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding
title_short Input-Dependent Frequency Modulation of Cortical Gamma Oscillations Shapes Spatial Synchronization and Enables Phase Coding
title_sort input-dependent frequency modulation of cortical gamma oscillations shapes spatial synchronization and enables phase coding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004072
work_keys_str_mv AT loweteric inputdependentfrequencymodulationofcorticalgammaoscillationsshapesspatialsynchronizationandenablesphasecoding
AT robertsmark inputdependentfrequencymodulationofcorticalgammaoscillationsshapesspatialsynchronizationandenablesphasecoding
AT hadjipapasavgis inputdependentfrequencymodulationofcorticalgammaoscillationsshapesspatialsynchronizationandenablesphasecoding
AT peteralina inputdependentfrequencymodulationofcorticalgammaoscillationsshapesspatialsynchronizationandenablesphasecoding
AT vandereerdenjan inputdependentfrequencymodulationofcorticalgammaoscillationsshapesspatialsynchronizationandenablesphasecoding
AT deweerdpeter inputdependentfrequencymodulationofcorticalgammaoscillationsshapesspatialsynchronizationandenablesphasecoding