Cargando…
A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union
This paper addresses the use of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the strength of evidence for health benefits of probiotic foods, especially relating to health claim substantiation in the European Union. A systematic review is a protocol-driven, transparent and replicable approach, wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0004-5 |
_version_ | 1782358212605902848 |
---|---|
author | Glanville, Julie King, Sarah Guarner, Francisco Hill, Colin Sanders, Mary Ellen |
author_facet | Glanville, Julie King, Sarah Guarner, Francisco Hill, Colin Sanders, Mary Ellen |
author_sort | Glanville, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper addresses the use of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the strength of evidence for health benefits of probiotic foods, especially relating to health claim substantiation in the European Union. A systematic review is a protocol-driven, transparent and replicable approach, widely accepted in a number of scientific fields, and used by many policy-setting organizations to evaluate the strength of evidence to answer a focused research question. Many systematic reviews have been published on the broad category of probiotics for many different outcomes. Some of these reviews have been criticized for including poor quality studies, pooling heterogeneous study results, and not considering publication bias. Well-designed and -conducted systematic reviews should address such issues. Systematic reviews of probiotics have an additional challenge – rarely addressed in published reviews - in that there must be a scientifically sound basis for combining evidence on different strains, species or genera. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is increasingly adopting the systematic review methodology. It remains to be seen how health claims supported by systematic reviews are evaluated within the EFSA approval process. The EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies deems randomized trials to be the best approach to generating evidence about the effects of foods on health outcomes. They also acknowledge that systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) are the best approach to assess the totality of the evidence. It is reasonable to use these well-established methods to assess objectively the strength of evidence for a probiotic health claim. Use of the methods to combine results on more than a single strain or defined blend of strains will require a rationale that the different probiotics are substantively similar, either in identity or in their mode of action. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4334596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43345962015-02-20 A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union Glanville, Julie King, Sarah Guarner, Francisco Hill, Colin Sanders, Mary Ellen Nutr J Review This paper addresses the use of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the strength of evidence for health benefits of probiotic foods, especially relating to health claim substantiation in the European Union. A systematic review is a protocol-driven, transparent and replicable approach, widely accepted in a number of scientific fields, and used by many policy-setting organizations to evaluate the strength of evidence to answer a focused research question. Many systematic reviews have been published on the broad category of probiotics for many different outcomes. Some of these reviews have been criticized for including poor quality studies, pooling heterogeneous study results, and not considering publication bias. Well-designed and -conducted systematic reviews should address such issues. Systematic reviews of probiotics have an additional challenge – rarely addressed in published reviews - in that there must be a scientifically sound basis for combining evidence on different strains, species or genera. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is increasingly adopting the systematic review methodology. It remains to be seen how health claims supported by systematic reviews are evaluated within the EFSA approval process. The EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies deems randomized trials to be the best approach to generating evidence about the effects of foods on health outcomes. They also acknowledge that systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) are the best approach to assess the totality of the evidence. It is reasonable to use these well-established methods to assess objectively the strength of evidence for a probiotic health claim. Use of the methods to combine results on more than a single strain or defined blend of strains will require a rationale that the different probiotics are substantively similar, either in identity or in their mode of action. BioMed Central 2015-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4334596/ /pubmed/25889449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0004-5 Text en © Glanville et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Glanville, Julie King, Sarah Guarner, Francisco Hill, Colin Sanders, Mary Ellen A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union |
title | A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union |
title_full | A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union |
title_fullStr | A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union |
title_short | A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union |
title_sort | review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the european union |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0004-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glanvillejulie areviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT kingsarah areviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT guarnerfrancisco areviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT hillcolin areviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT sandersmaryellen areviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT glanvillejulie reviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT kingsarah reviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT guarnerfrancisco reviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT hillcolin reviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion AT sandersmaryellen reviewofthesystematicreviewprocessanditsapplicabilityforuseinevaluatingevidenceforhealthclaimsonprobioticfoodsintheeuropeanunion |