Cargando…

The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model

When severe footrot was detected in Norway in 2008, a surveillance programme was initiated and followed by an elimination programme. By 2013 the disease had spread to two of 19 counties and a total of 119 (1%) sheep flocks had been diagnosed with severe footrot. A simulation model was developed to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grøneng, Gry M, Vatn, Synnøve, Kristoffersen, Anja Bråthen, Nafstad, Ola, Hopp, Petter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25828795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0150-y
_version_ 1782358213528649728
author Grøneng, Gry M
Vatn, Synnøve
Kristoffersen, Anja Bråthen
Nafstad, Ola
Hopp, Petter
author_facet Grøneng, Gry M
Vatn, Synnøve
Kristoffersen, Anja Bråthen
Nafstad, Ola
Hopp, Petter
author_sort Grøneng, Gry M
collection PubMed
description When severe footrot was detected in Norway in 2008, a surveillance programme was initiated and followed by an elimination programme. By 2013 the disease had spread to two of 19 counties and a total of 119 (1%) sheep flocks had been diagnosed with severe footrot. A simulation model was developed to estimate the potential spread of severe footrot in Norway and to estimate the relative importance of the different spreading routes. The model parameters were based on the rate of spread of the first 38 diagnosed cases and the management and climatic factors particular for Norway. The model showed that by 2013, severe footrot would have spread to six counties and infected 16% of the sheep flocks if no elimination programme had been initiated. If this is compared with the 1% of flocks that were diagnosed in Norway by 2013, there seems to be a large effect of the implemented footrot elimination programme. By 2035, it was estimated that severe footrot would have spread to 16 counties and 64% of the sheep flocks. Such an extensive spread would probably impose a large negative impact on the sheep industry and welfare of the sheep. The most effective way to curb the spread of severe footrot was by decreasing the within county infection rate. This could be achieved by decreasing the contact between flocks or by decreasing the environmental load of D. nodosus, for example by footbathing sheep, culling diseased sheep or eliminating severe footrot in the flock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4334600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43346002015-02-20 The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model Grøneng, Gry M Vatn, Synnøve Kristoffersen, Anja Bråthen Nafstad, Ola Hopp, Petter Vet Res Research When severe footrot was detected in Norway in 2008, a surveillance programme was initiated and followed by an elimination programme. By 2013 the disease had spread to two of 19 counties and a total of 119 (1%) sheep flocks had been diagnosed with severe footrot. A simulation model was developed to estimate the potential spread of severe footrot in Norway and to estimate the relative importance of the different spreading routes. The model parameters were based on the rate of spread of the first 38 diagnosed cases and the management and climatic factors particular for Norway. The model showed that by 2013, severe footrot would have spread to six counties and infected 16% of the sheep flocks if no elimination programme had been initiated. If this is compared with the 1% of flocks that were diagnosed in Norway by 2013, there seems to be a large effect of the implemented footrot elimination programme. By 2035, it was estimated that severe footrot would have spread to 16 counties and 64% of the sheep flocks. Such an extensive spread would probably impose a large negative impact on the sheep industry and welfare of the sheep. The most effective way to curb the spread of severe footrot was by decreasing the within county infection rate. This could be achieved by decreasing the contact between flocks or by decreasing the environmental load of D. nodosus, for example by footbathing sheep, culling diseased sheep or eliminating severe footrot in the flock. BioMed Central 2015-02-20 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4334600/ /pubmed/25828795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0150-y Text en © Grøneng et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Grøneng, Gry M
Vatn, Synnøve
Kristoffersen, Anja Bråthen
Nafstad, Ola
Hopp, Petter
The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model
title The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model
title_full The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model
title_fullStr The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model
title_full_unstemmed The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model
title_short The potential spread of severe footrot in Norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model
title_sort potential spread of severe footrot in norway if no elimination programme had been initiated: a simulation model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25828795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0150-y
work_keys_str_mv AT grønenggrym thepotentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT vatnsynnøve thepotentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT kristoffersenanjabrathen thepotentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT nafstadola thepotentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT hopppetter thepotentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT grønenggrym potentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT vatnsynnøve potentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT kristoffersenanjabrathen potentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT nafstadola potentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel
AT hopppetter potentialspreadofseverefootrotinnorwayifnoeliminationprogrammehadbeeninitiatedasimulationmodel